Scenario reduction techniques and solution stability for stochastic unit commitment problems

In power systems rife with uncertainty, stochastic unit commitment (SUC) models may be used to properly size and allocate operational reserves, in order to ensure a reliable and cost-efficient operation of the power system. The performance of SUC-based unit commitment schedules is however fully dependent on the scenario sets used to describe the uncertainty at hand. Dedicated scenario generation & reduction techniques (SGT & SRT) have been developed to generate and select scenario sets that capture the uncertain parameter, e.g. wind power, and yield a cost-optimal unit commitment (UC) schedule in reasonable computing times. Probability-distance based SRTs are by far the most used. In an extensive numerical study, we analyze the performance of so-called cost functions used in these SRTs. In addition, we propose a new cost function, which allows selecting a well-balanced subset of scenarios, resulting in a tractable SUC model and a cost-optimal UC schedule.

[1]  Daniel Kirschen,et al.  Comparison of scenario reduction techniques for the stochastic unit commitment , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.

[2]  Hua Wei,et al.  A Scenario Optimal Reduction Method for Wind Power Time Series , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  N. Cox Statistical Models in Engineering , 1970 .

[4]  William D'haeseleer,et al.  Optimization and allocation of spinning reserves in a low-carbon framework , 2016, 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM).

[5]  Anthony Papavasiliou,et al.  Multiarea Stochastic Unit Commitment for High Wind Penetration in a Transmission Constrained Network , 2013, Oper. Res..

[6]  Yonghan Feng,et al.  Scenario generation and reduction for long-term and short-term power system generation planning under uncertainties , 2014 .

[7]  Sarah M. Ryan,et al.  Solution sensitivity-based scenario reduction for stochastic unit commitment , 2014, Computational Management Science.

[8]  Jitka Dupacová,et al.  Scenario reduction in stochastic programming , 2003, Math. Program..

[9]  Michal Kaut,et al.  Evaluation of scenario-generation methods for stochastic programming , 2007 .

[10]  A. Conejo,et al.  Scenario Reduction for Futures Market Trading in Electricity Markets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  N. Growe-Kuska,et al.  Scenario reduction and scenario tree construction for power management problems , 2003, 2003 IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference Proceedings,.

[12]  A. Papavasiliou,et al.  Reserve Requirements for Wind Power Integration: A Scenario-Based Stochastic Programming Framework , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  Sarah M. Ryan,et al.  Scenario reduction for stochastic unit commitment with wind penetration , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.

[14]  Anthony Papavasiliou,et al.  Applying High Performance Computing to Transmission-Constrained Stochastic Unit Commitment for Renewable Energy Integration , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Kenneth Bruninx,et al.  A Statistical Description of the Error on Wind Power Forecasts for Probabilistic Reserve Sizing , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.