Decision support for integrated landscape evaluation and restoration planning

Abstract The historical patterns of Inland Northwest United States forests have been dramatically altered by a little more than two centuries of human settlement and land use. Spatial patterns of forest structural conditions, tree species composition, snags and down wood, and temporal variation in these patterns, have been altered to such an extent that the natural ebb and flow of terrestrial habitats and their linkages has been disrupted. Closely coupled with these changes, fire and other disturbance processes in most dry and many mesic forest types have also shifted, with a bias for increased severity and extent. Here, in the context of planning restoration of some semblance of historical vegetation pattern–disturbance process interactions, we briefly revisit why it is theoretically sound to estimate the range and variation in historical forest spatial patterns. We call these estimates of range and variation, reference conditions or reference variation (RV), and discuss how forest managers might use them when evaluating current landscape patterns to identify changes that may have important ecological implications. We term such evaluations, departure analyses, and we describe how departure analysis is implemented in a decision support system (DSS) for integrated landscape evaluation and restoration planning. The initial phase of the DSS uses logic-based modeling to evaluate existing patterns of forest vegetation in subwatersheds of one ecoregion against a corresponding envelope of historical reference conditions for the same region, thereby highlighting key departures. The secondary planning phase uses results from the analysis phase in a decision model to prioritize watersheds for possible management actions related to landscape restoration and maintenance. We conclude from our example that there are at least two advantages to a decision-support approach that treats evaluation and planning as distinct but integrated phases: (1) the overall decision process is rendered conceptually simpler and (2) practical considerations of efficacy and feasibility of management actions can be easily accommodated.

[1]  Craig A. Miller,et al.  Historical and current forest and range landscapes in the interior Columbia River basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. Part 1: Linking vegetation patterns and landscape vulnerability to potential insect and pathogen disturbances. , 1999 .

[2]  O. Loucks,et al.  From Balance of Nature to Hierarchical Patch Dynamics: A Paradigm Shift in Ecology , 1995, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[3]  K. Klonsky,et al.  Historical and current uses , 1998 .

[4]  P. Hessburg,et al.  Ecological subregions of the interior Columbia Basin, USA. , 2000 .

[5]  R. Holthausen,et al.  Source habitats for terrestrial vertebrates of focus in the interior Columbia basin: broadscale trends and management implications. Volume 1—Overview. , 2000 .

[6]  John F. Lehmkuhl,et al.  Habitat pattern around northern spotted owl locations on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington , 1993 .

[7]  Keith M. Reynolds,et al.  Knowledge-based assessment of watershed condition. , 2000 .

[8]  P. Hessburg,et al.  An environmental narrative of Inland Northwest United States forests, 1800–2000 , 2003 .

[9]  T. M. Quigley,et al.  Classifying plant series-level forest potential vegetation types: methods for subbasins sampled in the midscale assessment of the interior Columbia basin. , 2000 .

[10]  K. McGarigal,et al.  FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. , 1995 .

[11]  Paul F. Hessburg,et al.  A structural classification for inland northwest forest vegetation. , 1996 .

[12]  R. Holthausen,et al.  Source habitats for terrestrial vertebrates of focus in the interior Columbia basin: broad-scale trends and management implications. Volume 3 - appendices. , 2000 .

[13]  F. H. Eyre,et al.  Forest cover types of the United States and Canada , 1980 .

[14]  F. P. Kapinos,et al.  Hydrologic unit maps , 1987 .

[15]  W. Bossert,et al.  The Measurement of Diversity , 2001 .

[16]  Rauno V. Alatalo,et al.  Problems in the measurement of evenness in ecology , 1981 .

[17]  L. Milne,et al.  The Balance of Nature , 1953, Oryx.

[18]  P. Hessburg,et al.  DETECTING CHANGE IN FOREST SPATIAL PATTERNS FROM REFERENCE CONDITIONS , 1999 .

[19]  K. Reynolds.  EMDS Using a Logic Framework to Assess Forest Ecosystem Sustainability , 2001 .

[20]  K. P. Reese,et al.  LANDSCAPE CHANGES WITHIN THE HISTORICAL DISTRIBUTION OF COLUMBIAN SHARP-TAILED GROUSE IN EASTERN WASHINGTON : IS THERE HOPE? , 1998 .

[21]  Arthur S. Lieberman,et al.  Landscape Ecology , 1994, Springer New York.

[22]  Ricardo D. Kamenetzky.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS AND THE ADDITIVE VALUE FUNCTION , 1982 .

[23]  D. Schmoldt,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making , 2001, Managing Forest Ecosystems.

[24]  P. Hessburg,et al.  Recent changes (1930s–1990s) in spatial patterns of interior northwest forests, USA , 2000 .

[25]  Keith M. Reynolds,et al.  The science/policy interface in logic-based evaluation of forest ecosystem sustainability , 2003 .

[26]  P. Hessburg,et al.  Using a Decision Support System to Estimate Departures of Present Forest Landscape Patterns from Historical Reference Condition An Example from the lnland Northwest Region of the United States , 2004 .

[27]  C. Oliver,et al.  Forest stand dynamics: updated edition. , 1996 .

[28]  M. Hill.  Diversity and Evenness: A Unifying Notation and Its Consequences , 1973 .