ERP implementation and change: towards a cross-functional view

ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) systems are characterised by particular features such as functional coverage, interdependent relationships, single database and standard management and processing rules; all of which are capable of bringing about various degrees of change within the company and, potentially, encourage a more cross-functional overview of it. However, few quantitative studies have been conducted to measure these effects. This is the background to this paper, which studied 100 French companies to arrive at the following assessment of ERP adoption. It then goes on to test the relationships between the factors influencing the ERP lifecycle ((preparation (organizational vision, process re-engineering), engineering (specific developments), implementation strategy (functional coverage and speed)), the perception of a more cross-functional overview of the company and, more globally, the scope of the change this technology brings about within the company. All these factors play significant roles, with functional coverage appearing to be a particularly important consideration, which should be addressed in future research.

[1]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Implementing Radical Change: Gradual Versus Rapid Pace , 2018, ICIS.

[2]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Tailoring ERP systems: a spectrum of choices and their implications , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[3]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  ERP Implementation and Forms of Organizational Change , 1999 .

[4]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[5]  M. Lynn Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1996 .

[6]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  A taxonomy of ERP implementation approaches , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  Sergio Beretta,et al.  Unleashing the integration potential of ERP systems: The role of process-based performance measurement systems , 2002, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[8]  M. Crozier,et al.  L' acteur et le systeme , 1978 .

[9]  Robin S. Poston,et al.  The impact of enterprise resource planning systems on firm performance , 2000, ICIS.

[10]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  ERP project dynamics and enacted dialogue: perceived understanding, perceived leeway, and the nature of task-related conflicts , 2001, DATB.

[11]  Joan Antoni Pastor,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Research: An Annotated Bibliography , 2001, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[12]  J. McCann Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism , 1980 .

[13]  Dorothy Leon Ard-Barton Implementation Characteristics of Organizational Innovations , 1988 .

[14]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Jay R. Galbraith Competing with flexible lateral organizations , 1993 .

[16]  M. Markus,et al.  The Enterprise System Experience— From Adoption to Success , 2000 .

[17]  Nancy H. Bancroft Implementing SAP R/3 (2nd ed.): how to introduce a large system into a large organization , 1996 .

[18]  M. Lozzi,et al.  Joint design of organization processes and information system: a methodology based on action theory , 2000 .

[19]  D. Farmer Strategies for Change. , 1990 .