Immediate, non-submerged, root-analogue zirconia implant in single tooth replacement.

This report demonstrates the successful clinical use of a modified root-analogue zirconia implant for immediate single tooth replacement. A right maxillary premolar was removed and a custom-made, root-analogue, roughened zirconia implant with macro-retentions in the interdental space was fabricated and placed into the extraction socket 4 days later. Four months after root implantation a composite crown was cemented. No complications occurred during the healing period. An excellent esthetic and functional result was achieved with the composite crown. No clinically noticeable bone resorption or soft-tissue recession was observed at 26 months follow up. Significant modifications such as macro-retentions seem to indicate that primary stability and excellent osseointegration of immediate root-analogue zirconia implants can be achieved, while preventing unesthetic bone resorption. The macro-retentions must be limited to the interdental space to avoid fracture of the thin buccal cortex. This successful case warrants further clinical research in well controlled trials.

[1]  W Becker,et al.  Guided tissue regeneration for implants placed into extraction sockets: a study in dogs. , 1991, Journal of periodontology.

[2]  F. Pezzetti,et al.  Zirconium oxide coating improves implant osseointegration in vivo. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[3]  E. Keller,et al.  Endosseous implant placement immediately following dental extraction and alveoloplasty: preliminary report with 6-year follow-up. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[4]  U. Lekholm,et al.  Influence of initial implant mobility on the integration of titanium implants. An experimental study in rabbits. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[5]  M Hodosh,et al.  The dental polymer implant concept. , 1969, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  J R Strub,et al.  Custom-made root analogue titanium implants placed into extraction sockets. An experimental study in monkeys. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. , 1988, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[8]  D Lundgren,et al.  Healing-in of root analogue titanium implants placed in extraction sockets. An experimental study in the beagle dog. , 1992, Clinical oral implants research.

[9]  G. Raghoebar,et al.  Long-term evaluation of hollow screw and hollow cylinder dental implants: clinical and radiographic results after 10 years. , 2006, Journal of periodontology.

[10]  J. Oliva,et al.  One-year follow-up of first consecutive 100 zirconia dental implants in humans: a comparison of 2 different rough surfaces. , 2007, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.