The development of a model for determining scheduled replacement intervals for marine machinery systems

One of the challenges of maintenance management of a marine machinery system is the problem of selecting the optimum interval for replacement of equipment items. Most of the approaches that are given in the literature for selecting optimum replacement intervals are based on a single criterion model such as cost. This approach may be satisfactory for some industries but for the marine industry disruption in services will result in a considerable cost penalty and, as such, other factors such as system downtime and system reliability must be taken into consideration when determining the optimum replacement interval for the system. These decision criteria have been proven to be in conflict with one another. On this basis, a multi-criteria decision-making tool, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), is proposed in this article for aggregating multiple criteria in order for them to be used simultaneously in determining the optimum scheduled replacement interval for the equipment items of the system. The use of a multi-criteria decision-making tool allows the decision-maker to express preference for the decision criteria in terms of their levels of importance. To achieve this aim, a compromise decision weighting technique is integrated with TOPSIS. The compromise weighting technique was obtained from a combination of the variance method (an objective decision criteria weighting technique) and analytical hierarchy process (a subjective decision criteria weighting technique). In order to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed innovative methodology for determining the optimum replacement intervals for a marine machinery system and also validate the technique, a case study involving some equipment items of a marine diesel engine is presented. Although results show that it produces the same optimum solution as the methods in the literature, the proposed method is more flexible and less computationally intensive.

[1]  R. Barlow,et al.  Optimum Preventive Maintenance Policies , 1960 .

[2]  A. Cohen,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation in the Weibull Distribution Based On Complete and On Censored Samples , 1965 .

[3]  A. K. S. Jardine,et al.  Maintenance, Replacement, and Reliability , 2021 .

[4]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[5]  P. A. Bennett Practical Reliability Engineering , 1982 .

[6]  B. Inozu,et al.  Optimal maintenance, repair, and replacement for Great Lakes marine diesels , 1991 .

[7]  J. Moubray Reliability-Centered Maintenance , 1991 .

[8]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[9]  Anthony M. Smith,et al.  Reliability-Centered Maintenance , 1992 .

[10]  J. A. Rice,et al.  Transit Vehicle Component Maintenance Policy via Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods , 1993 .

[11]  O. G. Okogbaa,et al.  Optimal preventive-replacement intervals for the Weibull life distribution: solutions and applications , 1995, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1995 Proceedings.

[12]  Mario T. Tabucanon,et al.  A multicriteria approach to the selection of preventive maintenance intervals , 1997 .

[13]  Marvin Rausand,et al.  Reliability centered maintenance , 1998 .

[14]  Dong-Hyun Jee,et al.  A method for optimal material selection aided with decision making theory , 2000 .

[15]  Peng Huang,et al.  Stochastic Models in Reliability , 1999, Technometrics.

[16]  John W. H. Price,et al.  The constant‐interval replacement model for preventive maintenance , 2000 .

[17]  King Abdulaziz,et al.  Methods for Estimating the Parameters of the Weibull Distribution , 2000 .

[18]  R. Keith Mobley,et al.  Plant Engineer's Handbook , 2001 .

[19]  Hongzhou Wang,et al.  A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Balbir S. Dhillon,et al.  Engineering Maintenance: A Modern Approach , 2002 .

[21]  Dennis C. Alexander Application Of Monte Carlo Simulations To System Reliability Analysis , 2003 .

[22]  Liliane Pintelon,et al.  Maintenance concept development: A case study , 2004 .

[23]  D. Acharya,et al.  Age replacement of components during IFR delay time , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[24]  Johan Springael,et al.  PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Development of a risk-based maintenance (RBM) strategy for a power-generating plant , 2005 .

[26]  J Wang,et al.  An analysis of fishing vessel accidents. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Jing-Rong Li,et al.  Generation of possible multiple components disassembly sequence for maintenance using a disassembly constraint graph , 2006 .

[28]  T. P. Trigo,et al.  Optimization of the preventive maintenance plan of a series components system , 2006 .

[29]  Albert H.C. Tsang,et al.  Preventive effect of optimal replacement policies , 2006 .

[30]  A. T. de Almeida,et al.  A multi‐criteria decision‐aiding model using PROMETHEE III for preventive maintenance planning under uncertain conditions , 2007 .

[31]  W. Wu,et al.  Comparing the aggregation methods in the analytic hierarchy process when uniform distribution , 2008 .

[32]  Yung-Hsiang Cheng,et al.  Rolling stock maintenance strategy selection, spares parts’ estimation, and replacements’ interval calculation , 2010 .

[33]  R. V. Rao,et al.  A subjective and objective integrated multiple attribute decision making method for material selection , 2010 .

[34]  Adiel Teixeira de Almeida,et al.  A preventive maintenance decision model based on multicriteria method PROMETHEE II integrated with Bayesian approach , 2010 .

[35]  E. Lorna Wong,et al.  Proportional hazards modeling of engine failures in military vehicles , 2010 .

[36]  Shahrul Kamaruddin,et al.  Preventive replacement schedule: a case study at a processing industry , 2011 .

[37]  Shahrul Kamaruddin,et al.  Maintenance management decision model for preventive maintenance strategy on production equipment , 2011 .

[38]  Antonio Casimiro Caputo,et al.  AHP-based methodology for selecting safety devices of industrial machinery , 2013 .

[39]  Wei Wu,et al.  Development of a risk-based maintenance strategy using FMEA for a continuous catalytic reforming plant , 2012 .

[40]  Wei Liang,et al.  Reliability-centered maintenance study on key parts of reciprocating compressor , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering.

[41]  Andrew K. S. Jardine,et al.  Maintenance, Replacement, and Reliability: Theory and Applications, Second Edition , 2013 .

[42]  R. Khorshidi,et al.  Comparative analysis between TOPSIS and PSI methods of materials selection to achieve a desirable combination of strength and workability in Al/SiC composite , 2013 .

[43]  David J Smith Maintenance Engineering and Management by Klaas Smit , 2014 .

[44]  Ikuobase Emovon,et al.  A New Tool for Prioritising the Risk of Failure Modes for Marine Machinery Systems , 2014 .

[45]  Ikuobase Emovon,et al.  An integrated multicriteria decision making methodology using compromise solution methods for prioritising risk of marine machinery systems , 2015 .

[46]  Rob J. I. Basten,et al.  Exploring maintenance policy selection using the Analytic Hierarchy Process; An application for naval ships , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[47]  Huishan Wu,et al.  A novel framework to evaluate programmable logic controllers: a fuzzy MCDM perspective , 2016, J. Intell. Manuf..

[48]  Intensitas,et al.  Analytical Hierarchy Process , 2017 .

[49]  Ikuobase Emovon,et al.  Hybrid MCDM based methodology for selecting the optimum maintenance strategy for ship machinery systems , 2018, J. Intell. Manuf..