Making The Least Active Pay: A Simulation of Rewards and Penalties Under Demand Side Participation Programs

The orthodox approach for incentivizing Demand Side Participation (DSP) programs is that utility losses from capital, installation and planning costs should be recovered under financial incentive mechanisms which aim to ensure that utilities have the right incentives to implement DSP activities. The recent national smart metering roll-out in the UK implies that this approach needs to be re-assessed since utilities will recover the capital costs associated with DSP technology through bills. This paper introduces a reward and penalty mechanism focusing on residential users. DSP planning costs are recovered through payments from those consumers who do not react to peak signals. Those consumers who do react are rewarded by paying lower bills. Because real-time incentives to residential consumers tend to fail due to the negligible amounts associated with net gains (and losses) for individual users, in the proposed mechanism the regulator determines benchmarks which are matched against responses to signals and caps the level of rewards/penalties to avoid market distortions. The paper presents an overview of existing financial incentive mechanisms for DSP; introduces the reward/penalty mechanism aimed at fostering DSP under the hypothesis of smart metering roll-out; considers the costs faced by utilities for DSP programs; assesses linear rate effects and value changes; introduces compensatory weights for those consumers who have physical or financial impediments; and shows findings based on simulation runs on three discrete levels of elasticity.

[1]  I. Vogelsang Incentive Regulation and Competition in Public Utility Markets: A 20-Year Perspective , 2002 .

[2]  Franz Wirl,et al.  Impact of regulation on demand side conservation programs , 1995 .

[3]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  Domestic electricity consumption and demand-side participation: Opportunities and challenges for the UK power system , 2008 .

[4]  M. Larsson,et al.  Potential of Hourly Settlements in the Residential Sector of the Swedish Electricity Market—Estimations of Risk Reduction and Economic Result , 2010 .

[5]  I. Vassileva,et al.  Introducing a demand-based electricity distribution tariff in the residential sector: Demand response and customer perception , 2011 .

[6]  J. Torriti,et al.  Demand response experience in Europe: Policies, programmes and implementation , 2010 .

[7]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Demand side management: Benefits and challenges ☆ , 2008 .

[8]  A. Faruqui,et al.  Quantifying Customer Response to Dynamic Pricing , 2005 .

[9]  J. Laitner,et al.  Modeling technological change in energy demand forecasting , 1997 .

[10]  Ian Richardson,et al.  A high-resolution domestic building occupancy model for energy demand simulations , 2008 .

[11]  Uwe Dulleck,et al.  Do customer information programs reduce household electricity demand?—the Irish program , 2004 .

[12]  Virendra Ajodhia,et al.  Quality regulation of electricity distribution in Italy: an evaluation study , 2006 .

[13]  S. Littlechild Reflections on Incentive Regulation , 2003 .

[14]  Makoto Akai,et al.  Willingness to pay for green electricity in Japan as estimated through contingent valuation method , 2004 .

[15]  David S. Sibley,et al.  Asymmetric Information, Incentives and Price-Cap Regulation , 1989 .

[16]  S. Malpezzi,et al.  The Long-Run Price Elasticity of Supply of New Residential Construction in the United States and the United Kingdom , 2001 .

[17]  Matthew Leach,et al.  Discrete demand side control performance under dynamic building simulation : a heat pump application , 2012 .

[18]  John C. Panzar,et al.  Effects of the Change from Rate-of-Return to Price-Cap Regulation , 1993 .

[19]  Ryan Wiser,et al.  Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable energy: A comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles , 2002 .

[20]  Guy Judge,et al.  Underlying trends and seasonality in UK energy demand: a sectoral analysis , 2003 .

[21]  S. Banfi,et al.  Willingness to pay for energy-saving measures in residential buildings , 2007 .

[22]  T. V. D. Graaf,et al.  The international energy agency , 2014 .

[23]  C. Fischer On the importance of the supply side in demand-side management , 2005 .