Diversity in CLIL as experienced by Finnish CLIL teachers and students: matters of equality and equity

ABSTRACT This article focuses on how Finnish CLIL teachers and students orient to and experience diversity in CLIL. The data consist of teacher and student interviews that were analysed using qualitative content analysis to identify recurrent themes with regard to diversity. The findings indicate that the theme of equality in the sense of ‘the same for all’ in both teaching, assessing and homework was readily brought up by both groups, reflecting the ethos of equality prevalent in Finnish education. Equity, however, was not similarly highlighted even though it is a guiding principle alongside equality in the Finnish Core Curriculum for Basic Education. Teachers were found reluctant to topicalise diversity, at least in the form of explicit differentiation. This applied especially to academic skills, with students’ different linguistic skills more readily addressed. Both teacher and student interviews construct CLIL students as high-achievers in comparison to peers in regular classrooms. The students, however, also criticised being treated as a homogenous group and expressed wishes for personalised support. In sum, the findings show tensions between maintaining equality and securing equity in that adherence to the same type of education for all may render invisible the varying competences, ways of learning and needs for support.

[1]  Issues and Perspectives on Student Diversity and Content-Based Language Education , 2021, Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education.

[2]  F. Genesee,et al.  Introduction: Issues and perspectives on student diversity and content-based language education , 2021 .

[3]  María Fernández-Agüero,et al.  CLIL Students’ Affectivity in the Transition between Education Levels: The Effect of Streaming at the Beginning of Secondary Education , 2020, Journal of Language, Identity & Education.

[4]  M. Jahnukainen,et al.  How do educational reforms change the share of students in special education? Trends in special education in Finland , 2019, European Educational Research Journal.

[5]  P. Engelbrecht,et al.  Capability to be Educated—Inspiring and Inclusive Pedagogical Arrangements from Finnish Schools , 2018 .

[6]  T. Morton Reconceptualizing and describing teachers’ knowledge of language for content and language integrated learning (CLIL) , 2018 .

[7]  Jasone Cenoz,et al.  Introduction to part IV: The target language, the sociolinguistic and the educational context in CLIL programs , 2017 .

[8]  Kristiina Skinnari,et al.  6. CLIL Teachers’ Beliefs about Integration and about Their Professional Roles: Perspectives from a European Context , 2016 .

[9]  Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester Exploring primary school CLIL perceptions in Catalonia: students', teachers' and parents' opinions and expectations , 2015 .

[10]  Anssi Roiha Teachers’ views on differentiation in content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Perceptions, practices and challenges , 2014 .

[11]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  Fundamentals of Qualitative Research , 2011 .

[12]  Teppo Jakonen,et al.  Assessing (for) Understanding in the CLIL Classroom , 2020 .

[13]  K. Mård-Miettinen,et al.  Early Immersion in Minority Language Contexts: Canada and Finland , 2020 .

[14]  Kristiina Skinnari,et al.  Monella kielellä Suomen kunnissa 2017 : selvitys muun laajamittaisen ja suppeamman kaksikielisen varhaiskasvatuksen, esiopetuksen ja perusopetuksen tilanteesta , 2018 .

[15]  Kristiina Skinnari,et al.  Kielikylpy Suomen kunnissa 2017 : selvitys kotimaisten kielten kielikylvyn tilanteesta varhaiskasvatuksessa, esiopetuksessa ja perusopetuksessa , 2018 .

[16]  Kirsi Tirri,et al.  Teachers’ Knowledge of Curriculum Integration: A Current Challenge for Finnish Subject Teachers , 2018 .

[17]  Mari Bergroth Reforming the national core curriculum for bilingual education in Finland , 2016 .

[18]  J. Hautamäki,et al.  Education is special for all – the Finnish support model , 2013 .