Energy and exergy analyses and optimization study of an integrated solar heliostat field system for hydrogen production

Abstract In this paper, we propose an integrated system, consisting of a heliostat field, a steam cycle, an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and an electrolyzer for hydrogen production. Some parameters, such as the heliostat field area and the solar flux are varied to investigate their effect on the power output, the rate of hydrogen produced, and energy and exergy efficiencies of the individual systems and the overall system. An optimization study using direct search method is also carried out to obtain the highest energy and exergy efficiencies and rate of hydrogen produced by choosing several independent variables. The results show that the power and rate of hydrogen produced increase with increase in the heliostat field area and the solar flux. The rate of hydrogen produced increases from 0.006 kg/s to 0.063 kg/s with increase in the heliostat field area from 8000 m2 to 50,000 m2. Moreover, when the solar flux is increased from 400 W/m2 to 1200 W/m2, the rate of hydrogen produced increases from 0.005 kg/s to 0.018 kg/s. The optimization study yields maximum energy and exergy efficiencies and the rate of hydrogen produced of 18.74%, 39.55% and 1571 L/s, respectively.

[1]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  A review on solar-hydrogen/fuel cell hybrid energy systems for stationary applications , 2009 .

[2]  S. A. Sherif,et al.  Feasibility study of a solar‐assisted heating/cooling system for an aquatic centre in hot and humid climates , 1997 .

[3]  Soteris A. Kalogirou,et al.  Solar thermal collectors and applications , 2004 .

[4]  D. Stolten,et al.  Ten years of operational experience with a hydrogen-based renewable energy supply system , 2003 .

[5]  I. García,et al.  Performance model for parabolic trough solar thermal power plants with thermal storage: Comparison to operating plant data , 2011 .

[6]  Lu Jianfeng,et al.  Heat transfer performance and exergetic optimization for solar receiver pipe , 2010 .

[7]  S. Asghari,et al.  Study of PEM fuel cell performance by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy , 2010 .

[8]  A. Bejan,et al.  Second Law Analysis and Synthesis of Solar Collector Systems , 1981 .

[9]  Mohamed Gadalla,et al.  Performance analysis of a new designed PEM fuel cell , 2012 .

[10]  Nelson A. Kelly,et al.  Predicting efficiency of solar powered hydrogen generation using photovoltaic-electrolysis devices , 2010 .

[11]  D. Leung,et al.  Parametric study of solid oxide fuel cell performance , 2007 .

[12]  Zhifeng Wang,et al.  Energy and exergy analysis of solar power tower plants , 2011 .

[13]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Environmental and sustainability aspects of hydrogen and fuel cell systems , 2007 .

[14]  Eduardo Zarza,et al.  Parabolic-trough solar collectors and their applications , 2010 .

[15]  P. Hollmuller,et al.  Evaluation of a 5 kWp photovoltaic hydrogen production and storage installation for a residential home in Switzerland , 2000 .

[16]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Performance analysis of a PEM fuel cell unit in a solar–hydrogen system , 2008 .

[17]  Lan Xiao,et al.  A parabolic dish/AMTEC solar thermal power system and its performance evaluation , 2010 .

[18]  Linda Barelli,et al.  Analysis of the operating conditions influence on PEM fuel cell performances by means of a novel semi-empirical model , 2011 .

[19]  María José Montes,et al.  Performance analysis of an Integrated Solar Combined Cycle using Direct Steam Generation in parabolic trough collectors , 2011 .

[20]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Exergy: Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[21]  Juan C. Ordonez,et al.  Thermodynamic optimization of a solar system for cogeneration of water heating and absorption cooling , 2008 .

[22]  A. Omer.  Energy, environment and sustainable development , 2008 .

[23]  S. C. Kaushik,et al.  SECOND LAW ANALYSIS OF A SOLAR THERMAL POWER SYSTEM , 2000 .