Effect of age and birth weight on indomethacin pharmacodynamics in neonates treated for patent ductus arteriosus

Objectives To determine patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure rates, and indomethacin (INDO) toxicity rates in neonates dosed with INDO using an individualized pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) dosing approach. In addition, develop PD curves evaluating dose-response and concentration-response relationships for closure and renal toxicity, especially in select subgroups historically known as “poor responders” (<1000 g and ≥10 days postnatal age). Design Prospective, cohort study. Setting Level III neonatal intensive care unit. Subjects One hundred thirty-nine patients receiving 151 courses of INDO for PDA closure were evaluated. Interventions Patients initially received 0.25 mg/kg of INDO, followed immediately by 1 mg/kg of furosemide. INDO concentrations were obtained 2 hrs and 8 hrs after the dose and were assayed using high-performance liquid chromatography. Individualized PK parameters were calculated with subsequent INDO dosing based on the individualized PK variables to increase trough serum concentrations by 0.3–0.5 mg/L. Measurements and Main Results Ductal closure was successful in 127 patients (91%). Renal toxicity occurred in 21 (15%) patients and was temporary and reversible. No significant differences in response rates based on treatment weight or postnatal age were observed. PD curves were similar for neonates <1000 g vs. ≥1000 g. PD curves were also similar for neonates with postnatal age <10 days vs. ≥10 days. Statistically significant differences were noted between neonates categorized for postnatal age <10 days vs. ≥ 10 days in total days of therapy (1.8 vs. 2.3 days), total number of doses required to close PDA (3.5 vs. 5.6 doses), critical INDO dose (0.9 vs. 1.4 mg/kg), critical INDO concentration (1.9 vs. 1.4 mg/L), and critical dose/critical concentration ratio (0.52 vs. 2.2). Conclusions These findings support the hypothesis that the poor PDA closure rates with INDO for neonates >10 days postnatal age are the result of pharmacokinetic differences only and that weight does not impact response rates. Individualized pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic dosing of INDO continues to achieve higher closure rate than current dosing standards. Patients historically known as poor responders significantly benefit from this dosing approach.

[1]  R. Clyman,et al.  Prophylactic indomethacin: factors determining permanent ductus arteriosus closure. , 2000, The Journal of pediatrics.

[2]  P. Gal,et al.  Reopening of the ductus arteriosus after closure with indomethacin: importance of sustained effective indomethacin serum concentrations. , 1996, The Journal of pediatrics.

[3]  M. Brook,et al.  Factors determining reopening of the ductus arteriosus after successful clinical closure with indomethacin. , 1995, The Journal of pediatrics.

[4]  T. Trus,et al.  Optimal management of patent ductus arteriosus in the neonate weighing less than 800 g. , 1993, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[5]  P. Gal,et al.  Indomethacin for patent ductus arteriosus closure. Application of serum concentrations and pharmacodynamics to improve response. , 1990, Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association.

[6]  S. Goldberg Response of the patent ductus arteriosus to indomethacin treatment. , 1987, American journal of diseases of children.

[7]  T. Yeh,et al.  Indomethacin therapy in infants with advanced postnatal age and patent ductus arteriosus. , 1986, Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale.

[8]  M. Heymann,et al.  Factors determining the loss of ductus arteriosus responsiveness to prostaglandin E. , 1983, Circulation.

[9]  G. Peckham,et al.  Effects of indomethacin in premature infants with patent ductus arteriosus: results of a national collaborative study. , 1983, The Journal of pediatrics.

[10]  J. Lock,et al.  Furosemide promotes patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants with the respiratory-distress syndrome. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  A. Wilks,et al.  Furosemide prevents the renal side effects of indomethacin therapy in premature infants with patent ductus arteriosus. , 1982, The Journal of pediatrics.

[12]  R. Cotton,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of indomethacin in the neonate. Relation of plasma indomethacin levels to response of the ductus arteriosus. , 1981, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  V. Yu,et al.  Pharmacological closure of ductus arteriosus in preterm infants using indomethacin , 1980, Archives of disease in childhood.

[14]  R. Rowe,et al.  Plasma indomethacin levels in preterm newborn infants with symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus--clinical and echocardiographic assessments of response. , 1979, The Journal of pediatrics.

[15]  H. Gelband,et al.  Age-dependent closure of the patent ductus arteriosus by indomethacin. , 1978, Pediatrics.

[16]  W. Friedman,et al.  Pharmacologic closure of patent ductus arteriosus in the premature infant. , 1976, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  P. Gal,et al.  Indomethacin pharmacokinetics in neonates: the value of volume of distribution as a marker of permanent patent ductus arteriosus closure. , 1991, Therapeutic drug monitoring.

[18]  Yeh Tf,et al.  Indomethacin therapy in premature infants with patent ductus arteriosus--determination of therapeutic plasma levels. , 1989, Developmental pharmacology and therapeutics.

[19]  P. Gal,et al.  High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of indomethacin serum concentrations. , 1988, Journal of chromatography.