Approaches for Studying the Pathogenic T Cells in Autoimmune Patients a

Our provisional conclusions from this work are as follows. (1) For screening responses of established lines, native human AChR is not prohibitively scarce, especially if it is concentrated onto beads, and class II-transfected TE671 cells may be useful too; both may give vital evidence of AChR-specificity, but it is still crucial to confirm that with synthetic peptides. (2) For mapping epitopes, panels of full-length and shorter recombinant human polypeptides, and of synthetic peptides, are invaluable complementary material: longer peptides tend to stimulate particularly strongly. (3) Initial selection with pooled synthetic peptides can easily generate interesting lines from both patients and controls, but they may depend on the artificial processing sites that are an inevitable consequence of arbitrarily chosen start and stop points. Of course, these might conceivably be employed in unusual antigen-presenting cells (such as thymic myoid cells), so we cannot totally dismiss such "cryptic" epitopes. This system can sometimes select T cells responding to "natural" epitopes too, as now reported for tetanus toxin. Nevertheless, for these and other reasons, at present, we strongly favor using the longest human recombinant material possible, because it is apparently processed more naturally. This must be combined with rigorous screening for reactivity to E. coli-derived contaminants plus concomitant mapping of epitopes as above. Use of intact AChR for initiating lines may yet become feasible. (4) The T cells thus isolated and characterized so far are proving to be heterogeneous in the epitopes and presenting class II molecules they recognize, and in their T-cell receptor gene usage. It is premature to claim key myasthenogenic epitopes or clonotypes, but HLA-DR3 and the linked -DQw2 do not appear to monopolize presentation. (5) Assessing the disease-relevance of these T cells is a separate problem, highlighted by their apparent similarity in healthy controls. In the meantime, to test their potential pathogenicity, we are assaying their cytokine profiles and ability to help specific antibody production in vitro. In the hope that they do prove to be relevant, we are also using some of them to test possible therapeutic strategies that might prove applicable in the patients.

[1]  A. Vincent,et al.  Stimulation of human T cells by sparse antigens captured on immunomagnetic particles. , 1992, Journal of immunological methods.

[2]  J. Lindstrom,et al.  T cells from normal and myasthenic individuals recognize the human acetylcholine receptor: Heterogeneity of antigenic sites on the α‐subunit , 1992, Annals of neurology.

[3]  A. Vincent,et al.  Two isoforms of the muscle acetylcholine receptor α‐subunit are translated in the human cell line TE671 , 1991, FEBS letters.

[4]  E. Spack,et al.  Antigen-specific therapy of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by soluble class II major histocompatibility complex-peptide complexes. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  H. Rammensee,et al.  Fine specificity of cytotoxic T lymphocytes primed in vivo either with virus or synthetic lipopeptide vaccine or primed in vitro with peptide , 1991, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[6]  J. Bell,et al.  Extensive conservation of alpha and beta chains of the human T-cell antigen receptor recognizing HLA-A2 and influenza A matrix peptide. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  P Wordsworth,et al.  Critical role for the Val/Gly86 HLA-DR beta dimorphism in autoantigen presentation to human T cells. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  M. Oshima,et al.  Autoimmune T cell recognition of human acetylcholine receptor: the sites of T cell recognition in myasthenia gravis on the extracellular part of the α subunit , 1990, European journal of immunology.

[9]  L. Kappos,et al.  Myelin basic protein‐specific T lymphocyte lines from MS patients and healthy individuals , 1990, Neurology.

[10]  J. Howard,et al.  Immunodominant regions for T helper-cell sensitization on the human nicotinic receptor alpha subunit in myasthenia gravis. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  A. Vincent,et al.  The human muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha‐subunit exist as two isoforms: a novel exon. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[12]  H. Müller-Hermelink,et al.  Characterization of a protein with an acetylcholine receptor epitope from myasthenia gravis-associated thymomas. , 1990, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[13]  J. Rothbard,et al.  T-cell reactivity in myasthenia gravis. , 1989, Journal of autoimmunity.

[14]  R. Hohlfeld,et al.  Human T-helper lymphocytes in myasthenia gravis recognize the nicotinic receptor alpha subunit. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  R. Hohlfeld,et al.  Strategies for the modulation of neuroimmunological disease at the level of autoreactive T-lymphocytes , 1985, Journal of Neuroimmunology.

[16]  N. Gilhus,et al.  Rabbit antiserum to a citric acid extract of human skeletal muscle staining thymomas from myasthenia gravis patients , 1985, Journal of Neuroimmunology.

[17]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Primary structure of gamma subunit precursor of calf-muscle acetylcholine receptor deduced from the cDNA sequence. , 1984, European journal of biochemistry.

[18]  D. Grob,et al.  MYASTHENIA GRAVIS IN PATIENTS WITH THYMOMA, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO ONSET AFTER THYMECTOMY , 1978, Medicine.

[19]  H. Wekerle,et al.  INTRATHYMIC PATHOGENESIS AND DUAL GENETIC CONTROL OF MYASTHENIA GRAVIS , 1977, The Lancet.

[20]  D. Drachman,et al.  Thymic muscle cells bear acetylcholine receptors: possible relation to myasthenia gravis. , 1977, Science.