Some Core Contested Concepts

Core concepts of language are highly contested. In some cases this is legitimate: real empirical and conceptual issues arise. In other cases, it seems that controversies are based on misunderstanding. A number of crucial cases are reviewed, and an approach to language is outlined that appears to have strong conceptual and empirical motivation, and to lead to conclusions about a number of significant issues that differ from some conventional beliefs.

[1]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Watching language grow. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[3]  Neil Smith,et al.  The mind of a savant , 1995 .

[4]  Neil Smith,et al.  Learning the impossible: The acquisition of possible and impossible languages by a polyglot savant , 1993 .

[5]  C. Büchel,et al.  Broca's area and the language instinct , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Problems of projection , 2013 .

[7]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Poverty of the Stimulus Stands: Why Recent Challenges Fail1 , 2013 .

[8]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  Recursion in Pragmatics , 2011 .

[9]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  N. Clayton,et al.  The rationality of animal memory: complex caching strategies of western scrub jays , 2006 .

[11]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[12]  Guenther,et al.  Translation and Meaning , 1978 .

[13]  Stanley Dubinsky,et al.  Raising (and Control) , 2003 .

[14]  Matthew Walenski,et al.  The science of language , 2005 .

[15]  L. Bloomfield A Set of Postulates for the Science of Language , 1926, International Journal of American Linguistics.

[16]  P. Kay Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution , 1969 .

[17]  N. Enfield Without Social Context? , 2010, Science.

[18]  J. Zwart The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[19]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ? , 1985, Cognition.

[20]  Lidiya Tornyova,et al.  Bigrams and the Richness of the Stimulus , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Negation, questions, and structure building in a homesign system , 2011, Cognition.

[22]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited , 2011, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Andrea Moro The Equilibrium of Human Syntax: Symmetries in the Brain , 2012 .

[24]  Ken Hale Gaps in grammar and culture , 1975 .

[25]  D. Everett,et al.  What does Pirahã grammar have to teach us about human language and the mind? , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[26]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Cartography, Criteria, and Labeling , 2015 .

[27]  D. Pesetsky,et al.  Pirahã Exceptionality: A Reassessment , 2009 .

[28]  Marcel Thelen,et al.  Translation and Meaning , 2001 .

[29]  Charles R. Gallistel,et al.  Memory and the Computational Brain: Why Cognitive Science will Transform Neuroscience , 2009 .

[30]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  On Some Properties of Criterial Freezing , 2010 .

[31]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[32]  W. Quine Methodological reflections on current linguistic theory , 1970 .

[33]  Carol Neidle,et al.  The Syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure , 1999 .

[34]  D. Everett Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã , 2005, Current Anthropology.

[35]  Noam Chomsky Knowledge of Language , 1986 .

[36]  Victoria A. Fromkin,et al.  The mind of a Savant: Language learning and modularity: Neil Smith and Ianthi-Maria Tsimpli, 1995. Oxford, UK and Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell , 1996 .

[37]  K. Hale DEEP-SURFACE CANONICAL DISPARITIES IN RELATION TO ANALYSIS AND CHANGE: AN AUSTRALIAN EXAMPLE , 1973 .

[38]  S. Potter,et al.  Universals of Language , 1966 .