Complementarity of Interpersonal Behaviors in Dyadic Interactions

An important assumption of interpersonal theory is that during social interactions the behavior of one person tends to invite com-plementary behavior from the other person. Past research examining complementarity has usually used either confederates or fictitious interaction partners in their designs and has produced inconsistent results. The current study used observational ratings of behaviors of 158 participants as they interacted with partners across three different dyadic social situations. Randomization tests of hypothesized order relations found that the behaviors exhibited during these interactions tended to occur in a circular pattern predicted by the interpersonal circumplex. These tests also indicated support for Leary's (1957) orientation of the control and affiliation dimensions of the interpersonal circumplex and Carson's (1969) notion that dominant behavior induces submissive responses and friendly behavior encourages friendly responses.

[1]  R. Carson.  Interaction Concepts of Personality , 2019 .

[2]  T. Tracey,et al.  Complementarity of Interpersonal Circumplex Traits , 2001 .

[3]  S. Andersen,et al.  The impact of past relationships on interpersonal behavior: behavioral confirmation in the social-cognitive process of transference. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  D. Funder,et al.  The Riverside Behavioral Q-sort: a tool for the description of social behavior. , 2000, Journal of Personality.

[5]  J Blumenthal,et al.  Bright, bad, babyfaced boys: appearance stereotypes do not always yield self-fulfilling prophecy effects. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  D. Christopher Dryer,et al.  When Do Opposites Attract? Interpersonal Complementarity Versus Similarity , 1997 .

[7]  Terence J. G. Tracey,et al.  RANDALL: A Microsoft FORTRAN Program for a Randomization Test of Hypothesized Order Relations , 1997 .

[8]  M. Gurtman.  Personality Structure and Interpersonal Problems: A Theoretically-Guided Tem Analysis of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems , 1995 .

[9]  T. Tracey,et al.  An examination of the complementarity of interpersonal behavior. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  O. John,et al.  Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: the big five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. , 1993, Journal of personality.

[11]  S. Nowicki,et al.  Interpersonal Complementarity, Gender of Interactants, and Performance on Puzzle and Word Tasks , 1992 .

[12]  L. Hubert,et al.  Methods for Evaluating Vocational Interest Structural Hypotheses. , 1992 .

[13]  T. Widiger,et al.  Interpersonal complementarity and individual differences. , 1990 .

[14]  P. Costa,et al.  The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and the five-factor model. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Circular reasoning about interpersonal behavior: Evidence concerning some untested assumptions underlying diagnostic classification. , 1989 .

[16]  L. Horowitz,et al.  Inventory of interpersonal problems: psychometric properties and clinical applications. , 1988, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[17]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Psychometric and Geometric Characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). , 1988, Multivariate behavioral research.

[18]  H. de Vries,et al.  The dynamic relations among interpersonal behaviors: a test of complementarity and anticomplementarity. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  L. Hubert,et al.  Evaluating order hypotheses within proximity matrices. , 1987 .

[20]  Jim Orford,et al.  The Rules of Interpersonal Complementarity: Does Hostility Beget Hostility and Dominance, Submission?. , 1986 .

[21]  W. Swann,et al.  A battle of wills: self-verification versus behavioral confirmation. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  D. Kiesler.  The 1982 Interpersonal Circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. , 1983 .

[23]  Richard A. Shweder,et al.  Accurate reflection or systematic distortion? A reply to Block, Weiss, and Thorne. , 1979 .

[24]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. , 1979 .

[26]  E. Doughtie,et al.  The Geometric Relationship Between Holland's Personality Typology and the Vocational Preference Inventory. , 1973 .

[27]  E. Thoma.  Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality , 1965 .

[28]  M. Gurtman.  Interpersonal Problems and the Psychotherapy Context : The Construct Validity of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems , 2004 .

[29]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  The Pygmalion Effect and its Mediating Mechanisms , 2002 .

[30]  Joshua Aronson.  Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education , 2002 .

[31]  David C. Funder,et al.  Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. , 1999 .

[32]  Rauni Myllyniemi.  The interpersonal circle and the emotional undercurrents of human sociability. , 1997 .

[33]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Personality and social behavior , 1985 .

[34]  E. Foa,et al.  Societal Structures of the Mind , 1974 .

[35]  R. Carson.  Interaction Concepts of Personality. Chicago (Aldine) 1969. , 1969 .

[36]  T. Leary.  Interpersonal diagnosis of personality , 1957 .

[37]  H. S. Sullivan.  The interpersonal theory of psychiatry , 1953 .