In Multiple Myeloma, High-Risk Secondary Genetic Events Observed at Relapse Are Present From Diagnosis in Tiny, Undetectable Subclonal Populations

PURPOSE Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by copy number abnormalities (CNAs), some of which influence patient outcomes and are sometimes observed only at relapse(s), suggesting their acquisition during tumor evolution. However, the presence of micro-subclones may be missed in bulk analyses. Here, we use single-cell genomics to determine how often these high-risk events are missed at diagnosis and selected at relapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed 81 patients with plasma cell dyscrasias using single-cell CNA sequencing. Sixty-six patients were selected at diagnosis, nine at first relapse, and six in presymptomatic stages. A total of 956 newly diagnosed patients with MM and patients with first relapse MM have been identified retrospectively with required cytogenetic data to evaluate enrichment of CNA risk events and survival impact. RESULTS A total of 52,176 MM cells were analyzed. Seventy-four patients (91%) had 2-16 subclones. Among these patients, 28.7% had a subclone with high-risk features (del(17p), del(1p32), and 1q gain) at diagnosis. In a patient with a subclonal 1q gain at diagnosis, we analyzed the diagnosis, postinduction, and first relapse samples, which showed a rise of the high-risk 1q gain subclone (16%, 70%, and 92%, respectively). In our clinical database, we found that the 1q gain frequency increased from 30.2% at diagnosis to 43.6% at relapse (odds ratio, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.58 to 2.00). We subsequently performed survival analyses, which showed that the progression-free and overall survival curves were superimposable between patients who had the 1q gain from diagnosis and those who seemingly acquired it at relapse. This strongly suggests that many patients had 1q gains at diagnosis in microclones that were missed by bulk analyses. CONCLUSION These data suggest that identifying these scarce aggressive cells may necessitate more aggressive treatment as early as diagnosis to prevent them from becoming the dominant clone.

[1]  R. Fonseca,et al.  Chromosome 1q21 abnormalities in multiple myeloma , 2021, Blood Cancer Journal.

[2]  G. Morgan,et al.  Copy number evolution and its relationship with patient outcome—an analysis of 178 matched presentation-relapse tumor pairs from the Myeloma XI trial , 2020, Leukemia.

[3]  M. Mohty,et al.  Del17p without TP53 mutation confers poor prognosis in intensively treated newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. , 2020, Blood.

[4]  G. Parmigiani,et al.  Genome-Wide Somatic Alterations in Multiple Myeloma Reveal a Superior Outcome Group , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  M. Mohty,et al.  Early relapse after autologous transplant for myeloma is associated with poor survival regardless of cytogenetic risk , 2019, Haematologica.

[6]  Johannes L. Schönberger,et al.  SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python , 2019, Nature Methods.

[7]  D. Dingli,et al.  Impact of acquired del(17p) in multiple myeloma. , 2019, Blood advances.

[8]  O. Decaux,et al.  Development and Validation of a Cytogenetic Prognostic Index Predicting Survival in Multiple Myeloma. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  H. Goldschmidt,et al.  High subclonal fraction of 17p deletion is associated with poor prognosis in multiple myeloma. , 2019, Blood.

[10]  Pingping Qu,et al.  A high-risk, Double-Hit, group of newly diagnosed myeloma identified by genomic analysis , 2018, Leukemia.

[11]  Joshua F. McMichael,et al.  Visualizing tumor evolution with the fishplot package for R , 2016, bioRxiv.

[12]  B. Pégourié,et al.  Deletion of the 1p32 region is a major independent prognostic factor in young patients with myeloma: the IFM experience on 1195 patients , 2014, Leukemia.

[13]  G. Parmigiani,et al.  Heterogeneity of genomic evolution and mutational profiles in multiple myeloma , 2014, Nature Communications.

[14]  A. McKenna,et al.  Widespread genetic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma: implications for targeted therapy. , 2014, Cancer cell.

[15]  J. Carpten,et al.  Whole-genome sequencing of multiple myeloma from diagnosis to plasma cell leukemia reveals genomic initiating events, evolution, and clonal tides. , 2012, Blood.

[16]  G. Morgan,et al.  The genetic architecture of multiple myeloma , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[17]  Trevor J Pugh,et al.  Initial genome sequencing and analysis of multiple myeloma , 2011, Nature.

[18]  John D. Hunter,et al.  Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[19]  F. Magrangeas,et al.  Genetic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma , 2005, Leukemia.

[20]  O. Cope,et al.  Multiple myeloma. , 1948, The New England journal of medicine.