On the discrepancies between Monte Carlo dose calculations and measurements for the 18 MV varian photon beam.

Significant discrepancies between Monte Carlo dose calculations and measurements for the Varian 18 MV photon beam with a large field size (40 x 40 cm2) were reported by different investigators. In this work, we investigated these discrepancies based on a new geometry model ("New Model") of the Varian 21EX linac using the GEPTS Monte Carlo code. Some geometric parameters used in previous investigations (Old Model) were inaccurate, as suggested by Chibani in his AAPM presentation (2004) and later confirmed by the manufacturer. The entrance and exit radii of the primary collimator of the New Model are 2 mm larger than previously thought. In addition to the corrected dimensions of the primary collimator, the New Model includes approximate models for the lead shield and the mirror frame between the monitor chamber and the Y jaws. A detailed analysis of the phase space data shows the effects of these corrections on the beam characteristics. The individual contributions from the linac component to the photon and electron fluences are calculated. The main source of discrepancy between measurements and calculations based on the Old Model is the underestimated electron contamination. The photon and electron fluences at the isocenter are 5.3% and 36% larger in the New Model in comparison with the Old Model. The flattening filter and the lead shield (plus the mirror frame) contribute 48.7% and 13% of the total electron contamination at the isocenter, respectively. For both open and filtered (2 mm Pb) fields, the calculated (New Model) and measured dose distributions are within 1% for depths larger than 1 cm. To solve the residual problem of large differences at shallow depths (8% at 0.25 cm depth), the detailed geometry of an IC-10 ionization chamber was simulated and the dose in the air cavity was calculated for different positions on the central axis including at the surface, where half of the chamber is outside the phantom. The calculated and measured chamber responses are within 3% even at the zero depth.

[1]  J. Sempau,et al.  DPM, a fast, accurate Monte Carlo code optimized for photon and electron radiotherapy treatment planning dose calculations , 2000 .

[2]  G. Ding,et al.  Dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the buildup region for a high-energy photon beam. , 2002, Medical physics.

[3]  P. Andreo,et al.  Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water , 2001 .

[4]  R Mohan,et al.  Investigation of buildup dose from electron contamination of clinical photon beams. , 1983, Medical physics.

[5]  M. Fippel.  Fast Monte Carlo dose calculation for photon beams based on the VMC electron algorithm. , 1999, Medical physics.

[6]  O. Chibani.  Electron depth dose distributions in water, iron and lead: The GEPTS system , 1995 .

[7]  Cheryl Duzenli,et al.  Are neutrons responsible for the dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the build-up region for a high-energy photon beam? , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Frank Verhaegen,et al.  Validation of Monte Carlo calculated surface doses for megavoltage photon beams. , 2005, Medical physics.

[9]  I. Kawrakow.  VMC++, Electron and Photon Monte Carlo Calculations Optimized for Radiation Treatment Planning , 2001 .

[10]  D W O Rogers,et al.  Monte Carlo calculation of nine megavoltage photon beam spectra using the BEAM code. , 2002, Medical physics.

[11]  Aapm.  A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams. , 1983, Medical physics.

[12]  T C Zhu,et al.  Electron contamination in 8 and 18 MV photon beams. , 1998, Medical physics.

[13]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  XCOM: Photon cross sections on a personal computer , 1987 .

[14]  I. Kawrakow,et al.  Investigation of variance reduction techniques for Monte Carlo photon dose calculation using XVMC , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  D. Sheikh-Bagheri,et al.  Sensitivity of megavoltage photon beam Monte Carlo simulations to electron beam and other parameters. , 2002, Medical physics.

[16]  I. Kawrakow.  On the effective point of measurement in megavoltage photon beams. , 2006, Medical physics.

[17]  Robert J. Shalek,et al.  Determination of Absorbed Dose in a Patient Irradiated by Beams of X or Gamma Rays in Radiotherapy Procedures , 1977 .

[18]  B. Faddegon,et al.  Description and dosimetric verification of the PEREGRINE Monte Carlo dose calculation system for photon beams incident on a water phantom. , 2001, Medical physics.

[19]  O. Chibani,et al.  New electron multiple scattering distributions for Monte Carlo transport simulation , 1994 .

[20]  D. Rogers,et al.  AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. , 1999, Medical physics.

[21]  Merle E. Riley,et al.  Theoretical electron-atom elastic scattering cross sections , 1975 .

[22]  J. W. Motz,et al.  Bremsstrahlung Cross-Section Formulas and Related Data , 1959 .

[23]  Martin J. Berger,et al.  Multiple-Scattering Angular Deflections and Energy- Loss Straggling , 1988 .

[24]  J. L. Saunderson,et al.  Multiple Scattering of Electrons , 1940 .

[25]  J. Purdy,et al.  Build-up region of megavoltage photon radiation sources. , 1975, Medical physics.

[26]  C. Ma,et al.  BEAM: a Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units. , 1995, Medical physics.

[27]  O. Chibani,et al.  Monte Carlo dose calculations in homogeneous media and at interfaces: a comparison between GEPTS, EGSnrc, MCNP, and measurements. , 2002, Medical physics.