Measurement reliability of functional tasks for persons who self-propel a manual wheelchair.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the reliability of 4 functional tasks relevant to wheelchair seating. DESIGN Within-subject and between-rater comparisons. SETTING Rehabilitation center in Canada. PARTICIPANTS Two separate convenience samples of 10 male wheelchair users. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The 4 functional tasks were timed forward wheeling, ramp ascent, forward vertical reach distance, and ramp descent, scored by an ordinal performance scale. To determine test-retest reliability, the participants performed each task twice on the same day. To determine interrater reliability, 5 experienced therapists independently scored each participant. The ramp descent task was replaced with a 1-stroke push distance task due to difficulties with the interpretation of the ordinal performance scale. RESULTS Testing of all tasks was completed within 45 minutes, allowing for rest periods. There were no adverse incidents. One individual with C6 quadriplegia 4 months after spinal cord injury was unable to complete the ramp ascent. Estimates for test-retest reliability of all 4 functional tasks were excellent (r=.99). Interrater reliability was calculated for all tasks except the 1-stroke push and found to be excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient=.99). CONCLUSIONS The final 4 functional tasks are practical, safe, and reliable tests that may be used for clinical evaluation of wheelchair seating. Further research involving comparative assessments of wheelchair seating options is required to determine the discriminative ability of the tests.

[1]  C. Granger,et al.  The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. , 1987, Advances in clinical rehabilitation.

[2]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Michele Harms Ms Mcsp Effect of Wheelchair Design on Posture and Comfort of Users , 1990 .

[4]  M Lamontagne,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of wheelchair propulsion for various seating positions. , 1992, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  T M Cook,et al.  Lumbar support thickness: effect on seated buttock pressure in individuals with and without spinal cord injury. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[6]  A F Mak,et al.  Posture effect on seating interface biomechanics: comparison between two seating cushions. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  D Anson,et al.  Pediatric power wheelchairs: evaluation of function in the home and school environments. , 1991, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[8]  S. Barker,et al.  Reliability of measurements obtained with a modified functional reach test in subjects with spinal cord injury. , 1998, Physical therapy.

[9]  Deirdre R. Dawson,et al.  Development of the Power-Mobility Indoor Driving Assessment for Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities: A Preliminary Report , 1994 .

[10]  Myron G. Eisenberg,et al.  Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation , 1990 .

[11]  T M Cook,et al.  Effect of seat angle and lumbar support on seated buttock pressure. , 1988, Physical therapy.

[12]  Rory A. Cooper,et al.  Wheelchairs and seating: Issues and practice , 1996 .

[13]  I Bolin,et al.  Sitting position–Posture and performance in C5–C6 tetraplegia , 2000, Spinal Cord.

[14]  J. Minkel Seating and mobility considerations for people with spinal cord injury. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[15]  Mb Lerner-Frankiel Functional community ambulation : what are your criteria? , 1990 .

[16]  R. L. Kirby,et al.  The Wheelchair Skills Test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  L. Harvey,et al.  Reliability of a tool for assessing mobility in wheelchair-dependent paraplegics , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[18]  Dennis Zacharkow Wheelchair posture and pressure sores , 1984 .

[19]  R. Letts Principles of Seating the Disabled , 1991 .

[20]  S. Wood-Dauphinée,et al.  Assessment of global function: The Reintegration to Normal Living Index. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  D. Hobson,et al.  Seated Lumbar/Pelvic Alignment: A Comparison Between Spinal Cord-Injured and Noninjured Groups , 1992, Spine.

[22]  J Weinberg,et al.  The effect of trunk support on performance during arm ergometry in patients with cervical cord injuries , 1996, Paraplegia.

[23]  Albert M. Cook,et al.  Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice , 1995 .