Flow cytometric (DNA content and S‐phase fraction) analysis of breast cancer

The advent of therapeutic alternatives for patients with breast cancer has altered their clinical management profoundly. Because of this, the need for reliable prognostic indicators with definable clinical utility has spawned a number of objective evaluations of the neoplasm itself. Flow cytometric analysis of DNA and the cell cycle (S‐phase fraction) are two of the objective measurements. Their current status in breast cancer is unclear. In the important category of carcinomas with negative axillary lymph nodes, ONA content (ploidy) information does not add important, independent, or prognostic information. S‐phase fraction, in addition to correlating with DNA content and histologic grade, may be an independent factor, but methodologic variables have hampered definite conclusions about its utility. Currently, given the rather consistent absence of correlation between DNA ploidy, S‐phase fractions, and nodal metastases, the independent prognostic utility of the two flow cytometric parameters can be questioned. A resolution of their final status in the prognostic hierarchy depends on rigorous adherence to the variables affecting them, i.e., preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic factors.

[1]  L. Koss,et al.  Flow cytometric DNA analysis of human solid tumors: a review of the interpretation of DNA histograms. , 1991, Human pathology.

[2]  H. Frierson Ploidy Analysis and S‐Phase Fraction Determination by Flow Cytometry of Invasive Adenocarcinomas of the Breast , 1991, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[3]  D. Page Prognosis and Breast Cancer: Recognition of Lethal and Favorable Prognostic Types , 1991, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[4]  W. L. McGuire,et al.  Breast cancer prognostic factors: evaluation guidelines. , 1991, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  M. Gent,et al.  When is a prognostic factor useful? A guide for the perplexed. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  R. Camplejohn,et al.  Node-negative breast cancer: prognostic subgroups defined by tumor size and flow cytometry. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  G M Clark,et al.  How to use prognostic factors in axillary node-negative breast cancer patients. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  I. Ellis,et al.  Node negative breast cancer. , 1990, BMJ.

[9]  J Grogono,et al.  Node negative breast cancer. , 1990, BMJ.

[10]  C. Osborne,et al.  DNA flow cytometry in early breast cancer: a step in the right direction. , 1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  G. Del Bino,et al.  DNA ploidy of human breast cancer. , 1989, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[12]  H. Homburger,et al.  Assessment of interlaboratory variability in analytical cytology. Results of the College of American Pathologists Flow Cytometry Study. , 1989, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[13]  G. Auer,et al.  Intratumoral variations in DNA distribution patterns in mammary adenocarcinomas. , 1989, Cytometry.

[14]  A. Böcking,et al.  DNA grading of malignancy in breast cancer. Prognostic validity, reproducibility and comparison with other classifications. , 1989, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[15]  H. Bloom,et al.  Histological Grading and Prognosis in Breast Cancer , 1957, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  R. Camplejohn,et al.  Proliferative activity, histological grade and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in node positive breast cancer. , 1990, European journal of cancer.

[17]  R. Rubens,et al.  DNA index, S-phase fraction, histological grade and prognosis in breast cancer. , 1990, British Journal of Cancer.

[18]  D. Visscher,et al.  Multiparametric deoxyribonucleic acid and cell cycle analysis of breast carcinomas by flow cytometry. Clinicopathologic correlations. , 1990, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.