Enabling a just energy transition through solidarity in research

[1]  McKenzie F. Johnson,et al.  Doubling down on DAPL: the contentious politics of pipeline governance in Illinois , 2022, Environmental Politics.

[2]  S. Attari,et al.  Enabling an equitable energy transition through inclusive research , 2022, Nature Energy.

[3]  Francesca Pilo’.  Infrastructural Heterogeneity: Energy Transition, Power Relations and Solidarity in Kingston, Jamaica , 2022, Journal of Urban Technology.

[4]  A. Kalfagianni,et al.  Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance , 2022, Earth System Governance.

[5]  Xinxin Wang,et al.  Just transition: A conceptual review , 2021, Energy Research & Social Science.

[6]  Ji Johanna Höffken,et al.  Energy justice within, between and beyond European community energy initiatives: A review , 2021 .

[7]  E. Chu,et al.  Gender, sexuality, and feminist critiques in energy research: A review and call for transversal thinking , 2021 .

[8]  B. Sovacool.  Who are the victims of low-carbon transitions? Towards a political ecology of climate change mitigation , 2021, Energy Research & Social Science.

[9]  Tom Hargreaves,et al.  A systemic approach to mapping participation with low-carbon energy transitions , 2021, Nature Energy.

[10]  Diana Vela-Almeida,et al.  The right to decide: A triad of participation in politicizing extractive governance in Latin America , 2021 .

[11]  Anton Törnberg.  Prefigurative politics and social change: a typology drawing on transition studies , 2021 .

[12]  Ankit Kumar,et al.  A Postcolonial Critique of Community Energy: Searching for Community as Solidarity in India and Scotland , 2020, Antipode.

[13]  O. Gaffney,et al.  Powers of 10: seeking ‘sweet spots’ for rapid climate and sustainability actions between individual and global scales , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.

[14]  The Nation and Its Peasants , 2020, The Nation and Its Fragments.

[15]  A. Stirling,et al.  How deep is incumbency? A ‘configuring fields’ approach to redistributing and reorienting power in socio-material change , 2019 .

[16]  Stephen Williams,et al.  Justice in energy transitions , 2019, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

[17]  Jonas Wolff,et al.  Beyond contestation: conceptualizing negotiation in democracy promotion , 2019, Democratization.

[18]  A. Kenis.  Post-politics contested: Why multiple voices on climate change do not equal politicisation , 2018, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space.

[19]  N. Komendantova,et al.  Of transitions and models: Community engagement, democracy, and empowerment in the Austrian energy transition , 2018 .

[20]  M. A. Guzmán-Gallegos,et al.  New mechanisms of participation in extractive governance: between technologies of governance and resistance work , 2017, New Mechanisms of Participation in Extractive Governance.

[21]  Alf Hornborg.  Artifacts have consequences, not agency , 2017 .

[22]  J. Agyeman,et al.  Trends and Directions in Environmental Justice: From Inequity to Everyday Life, Community, and Just Sustainabilities , 2016 .

[23]  Dustin Mulvaney,et al.  The political economy of the ‘just transition’ , 2013 .

[24]  T. Hale.  A Climate Coalition of the Willing , 2011 .

[25]  Ingolfur Blühdorn.  Sustaining the unsustainable: Symbolic politics and the politics of simulation , 2007 .

[26]  A. Hawkes,et al.  Confronting mitigation deterrence in low-carbon scenarios , 2021 .