HERRO Missions to Mars and Venus using Telerobotic Surface Exploration from Orbit

This paper presents concepts for human missions to the orbits of Mars and Venus that feature direct robotic exploration of the planets’ surfaces via teleoperation from orbit. These missions are good examples of Human Exploration using Real-time Robotic Operations (HERRO), an exploration strategy that refrains from sending humans to the surfaces of planets with large gravity wells. HERRO avoids the need for complex and expensive man-rated lander/ascent vehicles and surface systems. Additionally, the humans are close enough to the surface to eliminate the two-way communication latency that constrains typical robotic space missions, thus allowing real-time command and control of surface operations and experiments by the crew. In fact through use of state-of-the-art telecommunications and robotics, HERRO could provide the cognitive and decision-making advantages of having humans at the site of study for only a fraction of the cost of conventional human surface missions. HERRO is very similar to how oceanographers and oil companies use telerobotic submersibles to work in inaccessible areas of the ocean, and represents a more expedient, near-term step prior to landing humans on Mars and other large planetary bodies. Its concentration on in-space transportation systems makes it extensible to destinations that have not been associated with human missions in the past but may be of potentially great scientific interest, such as Venus.

[1]  Fredrik Rehnmark,et al.  Robonaut: NASA's Space Humanoid , 2000, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[2]  Geoffrey A. Landis Low-Altitude Exploration of the Venus Atmosphere by Balloon , 2010 .

[3]  Geoffrey A. Landis Footsteps to Mars : An incremental approach to Mars exploration * , 2008 .

[4]  Daniel A. Kingsley,et al.  Improved mobility through abstracted biological principles , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[5]  Steven R. Oleson,et al.  Human Telerobotic Exploration of Venus: A Flexible Path Design Study , 2011 .

[6]  S. Hoffman,et al.  Human exploration of Mars, Design Reference Architecture 5.0 , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[7]  David Wettergreen,et al.  Developing Nomad for robotic exploration of the Atacama Desert , 1999, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[8]  George R. Schmidt HERRO: A Science-Oriented Strategy for Crewed Missions Beyond LEO , 2010 .

[9]  G. E. Ponchak,et al.  HIGH TEMPERATURE ELECTRONICS , COMMUNICATIONS , AND SUPPORTING TECHNOLOGIES FOR VENUS MISSIONS , 2007 .

[10]  Dan F. Lester,et al.  Human space exploration and human spaceflight: Latency and the cognitive scale of the universe , 2011 .

[11]  Rodger W. Dyson,et al.  Long-Lived Venus Lander Conceptual Design: How To Keep It Cool , 2009 .

[12]  G. R. Schmidt,et al.  Rationale for Flexible Path - A Space Exploration Strategy for the 21st Century , 2010 .

[13]  George R. Schmidt,et al.  HERRO Mars: Design Study for a Highly-Robotic Human Mission to Mars , 2011 .

[14]  J. E. Volonte,et al.  Manned Venus Flyby , 1967 .

[16]  Anthony J. Colozza,et al.  Atmospheric Flight on Venus: A Conceptual Design , 2003 .

[17]  David R. McCurdy,et al.  NUCLEAR THERMAL ROCKET/VEHICLE CHARACTERISTICS AND SENSITIVITY TRADES FOR NASA's MARS DESIGN REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE (DRA) 5.0 STUDY , 2009 .

[18]  Geoffrey A. Landis,et al.  Robotic exploration of the surface and atmosphere of Venus , 2006 .

[19]  Geoffrey A. Landis Teleoperation from Mars Orbit: A proposal for Human Exploration , 2008 .

[20]  Roger D. Quinn,et al.  Comparing cockroach and Whegs robot body motions , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.