Coordinating Public E-services - Investigating Mechanisms and Practices in a Government Agency

Coordination is a critical enabler when creating and managing coherent, integrated, secure and smart public electronic services (e-services) as a part of digitalization. With an increased demand for such services, coordination as an internal organizational phenomenon is becoming increasingly important. Based on a qualitative case study, and informed by coordination theory, this paper investigates two different theoretical views applied on internal e-service coordination within a government agency in Sweden. At the outset, the agency is seeking one generic way to coordinate the current heterogeneous and fragmented internal e-service landscape in a more efficient way. Hence, our aim also includes investigating the prerequisites and potential for this type of coordination. We conduct this study in two stages. First, we apply a well-established theoretical lens from organizational theory on a set of coordination efforts, thereby perceiving coordination as a planned and anticipated activity based on a fixed set of mechanisms. Second, we apply a lens of coordinating as emergent practice, which allows for an in-depth investigation of more flexible and dynamic aspects of coordinating activities in daily work. By combining these two views, we argue that this approach can facilitate and increase understanding of the dynamics and flexibility needed to understand the type of coordination needed in public e-service contexts. This can also imply that there is no single best practice or ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to internal e-service coordination. Instead, organizations need to acknowledge the need for multi-dimensional views revealing the inherent complexity of coordination; as planned as well as emerging activities.

[1]  Sebastian K. Boell,et al.  A Hermeneutic Approach for Conducting Literature Reviews and Literature Searches , 2014, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[3]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  Interdepartmental Interdependence and Coordination: The Case of the Design/Manufacturing Interface , 1995 .

[4]  P. Draper Reflexive methodology - new vistas for qualitative research: Media Reviews , 2008 .

[5]  Trevor Long,et al.  Five Ps for strategy , 2017 .

[6]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[7]  Guido van Os,et al.  The challenge of coordination: Coordinating integrated electronic service delivery in Denmark and the Netherlands , 2011, Inf. Polity.

[8]  Göran Goldkuhl What does it mean to serve the citizen in e-services? - Towards a practical theory founded in socio-instrumental pragmatism , 2007 .

[9]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Toward a Theory of Coordinating: Creating Coordinating Mechanisms in Practice , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Ulf Melin,et al.  Time to Refuel the Conceptual Discussion on Public e-Services - Revisiting How e-Services Are Manifested in Practice , 2017, EGOV.

[11]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[12]  Reinhardt A. Botha,et al.  Understanding the problem of coordination in a large scale distributed environment from a service lens view - Towards the South African public sector e-Administration criteria for coordination support , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  10 Coordination in Organizations: An Integrative Perspective , 2009 .

[14]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations , 1983 .

[15]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[16]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The interdisciplinary study of coordination , 1994, CSUR.

[17]  Ulf Melin,et al.  The enterprise system as a part of an organization's administrative paradox , 2010, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[18]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[19]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[20]  Tomasz Janowski,et al.  Universal and contextualized public services: Digital public service innovation framework , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[21]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[22]  Ida Lindgren,et al.  Electronic services in the public sector: A conceptual framework , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[23]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Coordination in Fast-Response Organizations , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Dag Ingvar Jacobsen,et al.  Adopting and Refining e-services — the Role of Organization Size , 2018 .

[25]  Bram Klievink,et al.  Coordinating e-government service delivery , 2010, DG.O.

[26]  Arild Jansen,et al.  The nature of public e-services and their quality dimensions , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[27]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Reputation, Learning, and Coordination in Distributed Decision-Making Contexts , 1992 .

[28]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Business & Management , 2008 .

[29]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Organizations , 1992, Restoration & Management Notes.

[31]  Karin Axelsson,et al.  Public e-services for agency efficiency and citizen benefit - Findings from a stakeholder centered analysis , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[32]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[33]  Karin Axelsson,et al.  Understanding Organizational Coordination and Information Systems - Mintzberg's Coordination Mechanisms Revisited and Evaluated , 2005, ECIS.

[34]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft , 2007, Inf. Organ..

[35]  Fotis Kitsios,et al.  Emerging Barriers in E-Government Implementation , 2010, EGOV.