Peripheral participation in video-mediated communication

The importance of overhearing, and other ways of monitoring communicative behaviour not explicitly directed at oneself, has been illustrated in numerous ethnographic studies of computer-supported cooperative work. This paper is concerned with a particular form of monitoring. A “peripheral participant” is defined as someone who has a legitimate interest in monitoring a joint task (being carried out by some “primary participants”) but who is not actively involved in carrying out the task themselves. The concept is illustrated through field studies of telemedical consultation and related to other analyses of overhearing. Two experiments are reported where participatory status was manipulated using a role-play task. Ratings of interpersonal awareness, measures of gaze direction and recall of the conversation all indicate that the task successfully operationalized the distinction between primary and peripheral participation. In addition, the experiment manipulated the visibility of the peripheral participant to a remote primary participant. This was shown to have an effect on the remote primary participant's interpersonal awareness of the peripheral participant. Potential mechanisms for this effect are considered. It is concluded that peripheral participation is a potentially important form of involvement that needs to be considered when designing and configuring equipment for video-mediated cooperative work.

[1]  Leon Adam Watts,et al.  Understanding interactive behaviour : a quantitative approach , 1998 .

[2]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Remote Conversations: The Effects of Mediating Talk With Technology , 1995, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Understanding by addressees and overhearers , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Conversations Over Video Conferences: An Evaluation of the Spoken Aspects of Video-Mediated Communication , 1993, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Some advantages of video conferencing over high-quality audio conferencing: fluency and awareness of attentional focus , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  J. Porac,et al.  Cognition and Communication at Work , 1999 .

[7]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Perspectives on HCI : diverse approaches , 1995 .

[8]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Inter-personal awareness and synchronization: assessing the value of communication technologies , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[9]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[10]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems , 1996, CSCW '96.

[11]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Task analysis for collaborative work , 1997, INTERACT.

[12]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[13]  A. Monk,et al.  Reasoning about tasks, activities and technology to support collaboration. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[14]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[15]  Christian Heath,et al.  Cognition and communication at work: Convergent activities: Line control and passenger information on the London Underground , 1996 .

[16]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[17]  A. Monk,et al.  Telemedicine. What happens in remote consultation. , 1999, International journal of technology assessment in health care.

[18]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Telemedical consultation: task characteristics , 1997, CHI.