Real-time cloud, radiation, and aircraft icing parameters from GOES over the USA

A preliminary new, physically based method for realtime estimation of the probability of icing conditions has been demonstrated using merged GOES-10 and 12 data over the continental United States and southern Canada. The algorithm produces pixel-level cloud and radiation properties as well as an estimate of icing probability with an associated intensity rating Because icing depends on so many different variables, such as aircraft size or air speed, it is not possible to achieve 100% success with this or any other type of approach. This initial algorithm, however, shows great promise for diagnosing aircraft icing and putting it at the correct altitude within 0.5 km most of the time. Much additional research must be completed before it can serve as a reliable input for the operational CIP. The delineation of the icing layer vertical boundaries will need to be improved using either the RUC or balloon soundings or ceilometer data to adjust the cloud base height, a change that would require adjustment of the cloud-top altitude also.

[1]  J. R. Atkinson,et al.  Cloud Physics , 1958, Nature.

[2]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Comparison of Stratus Cloud Properties Deduced from Surface, GOES, and Aircraft Data during the March 2000 ARM Cloud IOP , 2002 .

[3]  Barry E. Schwartz,et al.  An Hourly Assimilation–Forecast Cycle: The RUC , 2004 .

[4]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Comparison of Super-cooled Liquid Water Cloud Properties Derived from Satellite and Aircraft Measurements , 2003 .

[5]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  A Real-Time Satellite-Based Icing Detection System , 2004 .

[6]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Detecting Multilayer Clouds Using Satellite Solar and IR Channels , 2002 .

[7]  J. K. Ayers,et al.  Relationships Between Meteorological Conditions and Cloud Properties Determined form ARM Data , 2004 .

[8]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Comparison of cirrus optical depths derived from GOES 8 and surface measurements , 2004 .

[9]  J. K. Ayers,et al.  Cloud Detection Using Measured and Modeled State Parameters , 2004 .

[10]  David R. Doelling,et al.  Cloud Thickness Estimation from GOES-8 Satellite Data Over the ARM-SGP Site , 2002 .

[11]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Diurnal, Seasonal, and Interannual Variations of Cloud Properties Derived for CERES From Imager Data , 2004 .

[12]  P. Minnis,et al.  SUPERCOOLED LIQUID WATER CLOUD PROPERTIES DERIVED FROM GOES: 4.2 COMPARISONS WITH IN-SITU AIRCRAFT MEASUREMENTS , 2002 .

[13]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Advanced retrievals of multilayered cloud properties using multispectral measurements , 2005 .

[14]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Comparison of in situ and satellite‐derived cloud properties during SUCCESS , 1998 .

[15]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Parameterizations of reflectance and effective emittance for satellite remote sensing of cloud properties , 1998 .

[16]  P. Minnis,et al.  Rapid Calibration of Operational and Research Meteorological Satellite Imagers. Part I: Evaluation of Research Satellite Visible Channels as References , 2002 .