Political Polarization on Twitter

In this study we investigate how social media shape the networked public sphere and facilitate communication between communities with different political orientations. We examine two networks of political communication on Twitter, comprised of more than 250,000 tweets from the six weeks leading up to the 2010 U.S. congressional midterm elections. Using a combination of network clustering algorithms and manually-annotated data we demonstrate that the network of political retweets exhibits a highly segregated partisan structure, with extremely limited connectivity between left- and right-leaning users. Surprisingly this is not the case for the user-to-user mention network, which is dominated by a single politically heterogeneous cluster of users in which ideologically-opposed individuals interact at a much higher rate compared to the network of retweets. To explain the distinct topologies of the retweet and mention networks we conjecture that politically motivated individuals provoke interaction by injecting partisan content into information streams whose primary audience consists of ideologically-opposed users. We conclude with statistical evidence in support of this hypothesis.

[1]  R. D'Agostino An omnibus test of normality for moderate and large size samples , 1971 .

[2]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[3]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[4]  L. Hubert,et al.  Comparing partitions , 1985 .

[5]  R. Kolbe,et al.  Content-Analysis Research: An Examination of Applications with Directives for Improving Research Reliability and Objectivity , 1991 .

[6]  Edward M. Reingold,et al.  Graph drawing by force‐directed placement , 1991, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[7]  C. Sunstein The Law of Group Polarization , 1999, How Change Happens.

[8]  N. Couldry,et al.  Contesting media power: alternative media in a networked world , 2003 .

[9]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[11]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom , 2006 .

[13]  C. Sunstein Republic.com 2.0 , 2007 .

[14]  Réka Albert,et al.  Near linear time algorithm to detect community structures in large-scale networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Cross-ideological discussions among conservative and liberal bloggers , 2007 .

[16]  Daniel W. Drezner,et al.  The power and politics of blogs , 2007 .

[17]  S. Herring,et al.  Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment , 2010, ICWSM.

[19]  Brendan T. O'Connor,et al.  From Tweets to Polls: Linking Text Sentiment to Public Opinion Time Series , 2010, ICWSM.

[20]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[21]  D. Boyd,et al.  Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization Over Time on Twitter , 2010 .

[22]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Truthy: mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams , 2010, WWW.