The interdependence of structure, objects and dependence

According to ‘Ontic Structural Realism’ (OSR), physical objects—qua metaphysical entities—should be reconceptualised, or, more strongly, eliminated in favour of the relevant structures. In this paper I shall attempt to articulate the relationship between these putative objects and structures in terms of certain accounts of metaphysical dependence currently available. This will allow me to articulate the differences between the different forms of OSR and to argue in favour of the ‘eliminativist’ version. A useful context is provided by Floridi’s account of the relationship between ‘ontic’ and ‘epistemic’ structural realisms and I shall conclude with some brief remarks on possible extensions of OSR into other scientific domains.

[1]  M. Redhead,et al.  Quantum Physics and the Identity of Indiscernibles* , 1988, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[2]  A. Eddington.  The Nature of the Physical World , 1928 .

[3]  J. Ladyman,et al.  Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized , 2007 .

[4]  S. Psillos.  Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth , 1999 .

[5]  Stathis Psillos,et al.  The Structure, the Whole Structure, and Nothing but the Structure? , 2006, Philosophy of Science.

[6]  S. French,et al.  Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis , 2006 .

[7]  S. Saunders.  Are quantum particles objects , 2006 .

[8]  S. French,et al.  The Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity , 2006 .

[9]  H. Post.  Correspondence, invariance and heuristics: In praise of conservative induction , 1971 .

[10]  Steven French,et al.  Shifting to structures in physics and biology: a prophylactic for promiscuous realism. , 2011, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[11]  S. Saunders,et al.  Discerning Fermions , 2008, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[12]  Eric Winsberg,et al.  Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics , 2010 .

[13]  Harmke Kamminga,et al.  Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics , 1993 .

[14]  Geoffrey Hellman,et al.  Three Varieties of Mathematical Structuralism , 2001 .

[15]  James Ladyman,et al.  The Dissolution of Objects: Between Platonism and Phenomenalism , 2003, Synthese.

[16]  B. V. Fraassen.  Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective , 2008 .

[17]  Fraser MacBride,et al.  What constitutes the numerical diversity of mathematical objects , 2006 .

[18]  Don Ross,et al.  Ontic Structural Realism and Economics , 2008, Philosophy of Science.

[19]  J. Worrall.  Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?* , 1989 .

[20]  Simon Saunders,et al.  To What Physics Corresponds , 1993 .

[21]  Steven French,et al.  Looking for structure in all the wrong places: Ramsey sentences, multiple realisability, and structure , 2006 .

[22]  Nicholas Wolterstorff,et al.  Substance and Attribute. , 1984 .

[23]  Michael Esfeld,et al.  Moderate structural realism about space-time , 2006, Synthese.

[24]  J. Ladyman.  What is Structural Realism , 1998 .

[25]  Matteo Morganti,et al.  On the Preferability of Epistemic Structural Realism , 2004, Synthese.

[26]  Christopher G Timpson,et al.  Philosophical Aspects of Quantum Information Theory , 2006, quant-ph/0611187.

[27]  Stathis Psillos,et al.  Is Structural Realism Possible , 2001 .

[28]  James Ladyman,et al.  In Defence of Ontic Structural Realism , 2010 .

[29]  James Ladyman,et al.  Remodelling Structural Realism: Quantum Physics and the Metaphysics of Structure , 2003, Synthese.

[30]  Maureen A. O’Malley,et al.  Metagenomics and biological ontology. , 2007, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[31]  Steven French,et al.  VI* STRUCTURE AS A WEAPON OF THE REALIST' , 2006 .

[32]  D. Malament,et al.  Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics , 2002 .

[33]  David Wallace,et al.  Everett and structure , 2001 .

[34]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  A defence of informational structural realism , 2007, Synthese.

[35]  Tian Yu Cao,et al.  Structural Realism and the Interpretation of Quantum Field Theory , 2003, Synthese.

[36]  Steven French,et al.  Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics: Essays in Honour of Heinz Post , 2009 .

[37]  James Ladyman,et al.  Scientific Structuralism: On The Identity and Diversity of Objects in a Structure , 2007 .

[38]  S. Shapiro.  Philosophy of mathematics : structure and ontology , 1997 .

[39]  James Ladyman,et al.  Between Platonism and Phenomalism: Reply to Cao , 2003 .

[40]  Stathis Psillos.  The Structure, the Whole Structure, and Nothing but the Structure? , 2006, Philosophy of Science.

[41]  Erich H. Reck,et al.  Structures And Structuralism In Contemporary Philosophy Of Mathematics , 2000, Synthese.

[42]  E. Lowe.  The possibility of metaphysics , 1998 .

[43]  Alisa Bokulich,et al.  Scientific Structuralism, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of science , 2011 .

[44]  Paul Teller,et al.  Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View , 1991 .

[45]  P. Frank,et al.  Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science , 1968 .

[46]  Øystein Linnebo,et al.  Structuralism and the notion of dependence , 2007 .

[47]  Jacob Busch.  What structures could not be , 2003 .

[48]  Stathis Psilos.  Is Structural Realism the Best of Both Worlds , 2005 .