Anonymity, Privacy and Cyberspace

This paper examines some of the issues relating to the protection of privacy on-line, specifically whether anonymity is a necessary and proportionate response to the issues raised. The subject is considered in the light of the relationship between anonymity and privacy, the application of existing data protection law, current proposals and the possibility that increased anonymous use of the Internet and World Wide Web may, itself, create further regulatory challenges.

[1]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Size and Anonymity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation , 1992 .

[2]  P. Zimbardo The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. , 1969 .

[3]  Harold C. Releya Technology and privacy: The new landscape , 1998 .

[4]  Mark Levine,et al.  On the consequences of deindividuation manipulations for the strategic communication of self: Identifiability and the presentation of social identity. , 1994 .

[5]  A. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2013 .

[6]  Graham Greenleaf,et al.  An Endnote on Regulating Cyberspace: Architecture vs Law? , 1998 .

[7]  Viktor Mayer-Schönberger,et al.  Generational development of data protection in Europe , 1997 .

[8]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[9]  Lawrence Lessig The Law of the Horse: What Cyberlaw Might Teach , 1999 .

[10]  D. Feldman Secrecy, Dignity, or Autonomy? Views of Privacy as a Civil Liberty , 1994 .

[11]  R. Gallupe,et al.  Some Liberating Effects of Anonymous Electronic Brainstorming , 1998 .

[12]  P. Agre,et al.  Technology and privacy: The new landscape , 1998 .

[13]  Russell Spears,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, DEINDIVIDUATION AND GROUP DECISION-MAKING , 1991 .

[14]  S. Reicher,et al.  More on deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: Three studies on the effects of visibility to the in‐group , 1998 .