Characterising material and process variation effects on springback robustness for a semi-cylindrical sheet metal forming process

Abstract Variation in the incoming sheet material and fluctuations in the press setup is unavoidable in many stamping plants. The effect of these variations can have a large influence on the quality of the final stamping, in particular, unpredictable springback of the sheet when the tooling is removed. While stochastic simulation techniques have been developed to simulate this problem, there has been little research that connects the influence of the noise sources to springback. This paper characterises the effect of material and process variation on the robustness of springback for a semi-cylindrical channel forming operation, which shares a similar cross-section profile as many automotive structural components. The study was conducted using the specialised sheet metal forming package AutoForm™ Sigma, for which a series of stochastic simulations were performed with each of the noise sources incrementally introduced. The effective stress and effective strain scatter in a critical location of the part was examined and a response window, which indicates the respective process robustness, was defined. The incremental introduction of the noise sources allows the change in size of the stress–strain response window to be tracked. The results showed that changes to process variation parameters, such as BHP and friction coefficient, directly affect the strain component of the stress–strain response window by altering the magnitude of external work applied to forming system. Material variation, on the other hand, directly affected the stress component of the response window. A relationship between the effective stress–strain response window and the variation in springback was also established.

[1]  Michał Kleiber,et al.  Response surface method for probabilistic assessment of metal forming failures , 2004 .

[2]  Alf Andersson,et al.  Numerical and experimental evaluation of springback in a front side member , 2005 .

[3]  Ben Clark,et al.  Sheet Forming Simulation For AHSS Components In The Automotive Industry , 2004 .

[4]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  New Metrics for Evaluating Monte Carlo Tolerance Analysis of Assemblies , 1998, Manufacturing Science and Engineering.

[5]  Bernard Rolfe,et al.  Multivariate modelling of variability in sheet metal forming , 2008 .

[6]  Karl D. Majeske,et al.  Identifying Sources of Variation in Sheet Metal Stamping , 2003 .

[7]  Peng Chen,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Springback Variation in Forming of High Strength Steels , 2008 .

[8]  Walton M. Hancock,et al.  ANALYSIS OF COMPONENTS OF VARIATION IN AUTOMOTIVE STAMPING PROCESSES , 1997 .

[9]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[10]  Z. Marciniak,et al.  The mechanics of sheet metal forming , 1992 .

[11]  Mehran Kadkhodayan,et al.  On the relation of equivalent plastic strain and springback in sheet draw bending , 2008 .

[12]  Chung-Yeh Sa Sensitivity of sheet metal forming parameters , 1989 .

[13]  Peng Chen,et al.  Simulation of springback variation in forming of advanced high strength steels , 2007 .

[14]  Carlos Espina,et al.  ULSAB-Advanced Vehicle Concepts - Materials , 2002 .

[15]  Luc Papeleux,et al.  Finite element simulation of springback in sheet metal forming , 2002 .

[16]  Yakov Frayman,et al.  Analysis of stamping production data with view towards quality management , 2003 .

[17]  Matthew Doolan Metal forming signature analysis using active shape models , 2002 .

[18]  Wei Chen,et al.  Approaches for Model Validation: Methodology and Illustration on a Sheet Metal Flanging Process , 2006 .

[19]  Yuyao Li,et al.  Application of Six Sigma Robust Optimization in Sheet Metal Forming , 2005 .

[20]  Syed H. Masood,et al.  Numerical Simulation and Optimisation of Sheet Metal Forming for Auto-Body Panel Using AutoForm Software , 2007 .