Cell-Gel Mechanical Interactions as an Approach to Rapidly and Quantitatively Reveal Invasive Subpopulations of Metastatic Cancer Cells.

We present a novel mechanobiology-based invasiveness assay to rapidly and quantitatively evaluate the mechanical invasiveness of metastatic cancer cells and identify invasive subpopulations, without need for chemoattractants and independent of serum content. A commonly accepted assay to determine metastatic potential in vitro is the Boyden chamber assay, where the percentage of serum-starved cells that can long-term transmigrate/invade through subcell size membrane pores is quantified; those experiments typically take 2-3 days and require serum-starvation. To squeeze through the small pores, the invasive cells must be pliable, yet they are also able to force their way through flexible microenvironments. We have previously shown that metastatic breast cancer cells will deform and indent soft, impenetrable, elastic gels within 2 h of seeding, without requiring serum starvation. Specifically, in cell lines with higher metastatic potential, a larger percentage of cells will indent gels and typically also to deeper depths. Thus, we are able to rapidly reveal mechanically invasive subpopulations, which are likely those that lead to high metastatic potential. By comparing the Boyden chamber and gel mechanobiology assays, we show that the gel-indenting cell subpopulations are part of the group that successfully transmigrates through the Boyden chamber membrane (8 μm pores). Thus, we are able to rapidly (within 2 h of seeding and using the standard cell media), provide a quantitative measure of the mechanical invasiveness of cancer cells, which is correlated to the metastatic potential but is an independent parameter; we evaluate numbers of indenting cells and their indentation depth. Moreover, the mechanical invasiveness assay allows focus on specific (invasive or noninvasive) cells within the sample to identify specific surface markers, determine invasive mechanisms, and evaluate effects of applied drugs and treatments on the different subpopulations.

[1]  A. Fuhrmann,et al.  AFM stiffness nanotomography of normal, metaplastic and dysplastic human esophageal cells , 2011, Physical biology.

[2]  Stefan Schinkinger,et al.  Deformability‐based flow cytometry , 2004, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[3]  J. Rao,et al.  Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[4]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Mechanical regulation of a molecular clutch defines force transmission and transduction in response to matrix rigidity , 2016, Nature Cell Biology.

[5]  Andrew J Ewald,et al.  ECM microenvironment regulates collective migration and local dissemination in normal and malignant mammary epithelium , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  E. Denisov,et al.  Cancer Invasion: Patterns and Mechanisms , 2015, Acta naturae.

[7]  Jeffrey J. Fredberg,et al.  Cytoskeletal stiffness, friction, and fluidity of cancer cell lines with different metastatic potential , 2012, Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

[8]  Daphne Weihs,et al.  Metastatic cancer cells tenaciously indent impenetrable, soft substrates , 2013 .

[9]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Vinculin Facilitates Cell Invasion into Three-dimensional Collagen Matrices* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  Daphne Weihs,et al.  Experimental evidence of strong anomalous diffusion in living cells. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Yang-Kao Wang,et al.  Mechanical phenotype of cancer cells: cell softening and loss of stiffness sensing , 2015, Oncotarget.

[12]  Q. Ye,et al.  Serum deprivation confers the MDA-MB-231 breast cancer line with an EGFR/JAK3/PLD2 system that maximizes cancer cell invasion. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  J. Bussink,et al.  Hypoxia stimulates migration of breast cancer cells via the PERK/ATF4/LAMP3-arm of the unfolded protein response , 2013, Breast Cancer Research.

[14]  Ben Fabry,et al.  3D Traction Forces in Cancer Cell Invasion , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  P. Friedl.  Prespecification and plasticity: shifting mechanisms of cell migration. , 2004, Current opinion in cell biology.

[16]  Casey M. Kraning-Rush,et al.  Cellular Traction Stresses Increase with Increasing Metastatic Potential , 2012, PloS one.

[17]  J. Marchal,et al.  Low adherent cancer cell subpopulations are enriched in tumorigenic and metastatic epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-induced cancer stem-like cells , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Stefan Schinkinger,et al.  Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[19]  D. Weihs,et al.  Quantitative measures to reveal coordinated cytoskeleton-nucleus reorganization during in vitro invasion of cancer cells , 2015 .

[20]  Robert Ros,et al.  Correlating confocal microscopy and atomic force indentation reveals metastatic cancer cells stiffen during invasion into collagen I matrices , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Olga Ilina,et al.  Mechanisms of collective cell migration at a glance , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[22]  Valerie M. Weaver,et al.  A tense situation: forcing tumour progression , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[23]  Daphne Weihs,et al.  Metastatic breast cancer cells adhere strongly on varying stiffness substrates, initially without adjusting their morphology , 2017, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[24]  Falk Wottawah,et al.  Oral cancer diagnosis by mechanical phenotyping. , 2009, Cancer research.

[25]  Yunyun Zhou,et al.  An epigenetically distinct breast cancer cell subpopulation promotes collective invasion. , 2015, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[26]  C. Lim,et al.  AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. , 2008, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[27]  Ueli Aebi,et al.  The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[28]  H Delanoë-Ayari,et al.  4D traction force microscopy reveals asymmetric cortical forces in migrating Dictyostelium cells. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[29]  T. Masuda,et al.  Poisson's ratio of polyacrylamide (PAAm) gels , 1996 .

[30]  Claudia Tanja Mierke,et al.  Invasive cancer cell lines exhibit biomechanical properties that are distinct from their noninvasive counterparts , 2011 .

[31]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Stress fluctuations and motion of cytoskeletal-bound markers. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  C. Verdier,et al.  Physical properties of polyacrylamide gels probed by AFM and rheology , 2015 .

[33]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Contractile forces in tumor cell migration. , 2008, European journal of cell biology.

[34]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Mechanics, malignancy, and metastasis: The force journey of a tumor cell , 2009, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[35]  Shu Chien,et al.  Live Cells Exert 3-Dimensional Traction Forces on Their Substrata , 2009, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[36]  Andrew G. Clark,et al.  Modes of cancer cell invasion and the role of the microenvironment. , 2015, Current opinion in cell biology.

[37]  D. Weihs,et al.  Origin of active transport in breast-cancer cells , 2013 .

[38]  R. Korah,et al.  1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and retonic acid analogues induce differentiation in breast cancer cells with function- and cell-specific additive effects , 2001, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[39]  Maayan Schvartzer,et al.  Mechanical Interaction of Metastatic Cancer Cells with a Soft Gel , 2015 .

[40]  Erik Sahai,et al.  Mechanisms of cancer cell invasion. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[41]  Daphne Weihs,et al.  Intracellular Mechanics and Activity of Breast Cancer Cells Correlate with Metastatic Potential , 2012, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.