Visual acuity, crowding, and stereo-vision are linked in children with and without amblyopia.

PURPOSE During development, the presence of strabismus and anisometropia frequently leads to amblyopia, a visual disorder characterized by interocular acuity differences. Although additional deficits in contrast sensitivity, crowding (the impaired recognition of closely spaced objects), and stereoacuity are common, the relationship between these abilities is unclear. METHODS We measured the covariation between these four abilities in children 4 to 9 years of age (n = 72) with strabismus, anisometropia, or mixed strabismus/anisometropia, and unaffected controls. Children reported the orientation of a target (a modified "Pac-Man," similar to Landolt-C stimuli) using four "ghosts" as references. Using a modified staircase procedure we measured threshold size (acuity), contrast detection, foveal crowding (the minimum separation between target and ghost-flankers supporting accurate identification), and stereoacuity (with random-dot stereogram ghosts). RESULTS Group averages revealed significant interocular differences (IODs) in acuity for all three clinical groups (0.2-0.3 log minutes), and significant crowding IODs for the strabismic and mixed groups (0.6 and 0.4°, respectively). Nonetheless, crowding IODs were correlated with acuity IODs in all four groups (r values between 0.43 and 0.59 and P < 0.05; P = 0.07 in the mixed group). Similarly, the occurrence of stereo-blindness (most common in strabismic and mixed groups) was associated with a significant increase in IODs for both acuity and crowding (each P < 0.05). No correlations were found with contrast detection. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate an association between IODs in acuity and crowding and, furthermore, between these IODs and the presence of stereo-vision. We suggest that the deficits derived from strabismus and anisometropia lay along a continuum with abilities observed during normal development.

[1]  K Simons,et al.  A comparison of the Frisby, Random-Dot E, TNO, and Randot circles stereotests in screening and office use. , 1981, Archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  Steven C Dakin,et al.  Positional averaging explains crowding with letter-like stimuli , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Elaine J. Anderson,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Crowding-Induced Changes in Appearance , 2011, Current Biology.

[4]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[5]  P. J. Knox,et al.  An exploratory study: prolonged periods of binocular stimulation can provide an effective treatment for childhood amblyopia. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  S. Klein,et al.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[7]  J. Holmes,et al.  Maximum angle of horizontal strabismus consistent with true stereopsis. , 2004, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[8]  Manfred Fahle,et al.  The development of vernier acuity in human infants , 1991, Vision Research.

[9]  Roger W Li,et al.  Characterizing the mechanisms of improvement for position discrimination in adult amblyopia. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[10]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  S. Azen,et al.  Visual Acuity Norms in Pre-School Children: The Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study , 2009, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  H. Ono,et al.  Depth perception as a function of motion parallax and absolute-distance information. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  D. Pelli,et al.  Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[14]  D R Weakley,et al.  The association between nonstrabismic anisometropia, amblyopia, and subnormal binocularity. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[15]  Alison R. Davis,et al.  Differential changes of magnocellular and parvocellular visual function in early- and late-onset strabismic amblyopia. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  L. P. O'Keefe,et al.  Neuronal Correlates of Amblyopia in the Visual Cortex of Macaque Monkeys with Experimental Strabismus and Anisometropia , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  J P Frisby,et al.  Use of random-dot sterograms in the clinical assessment of strabismic patients. , 1975, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  D. Hubel,et al.  SINGLE-CELL RESPONSES IN STRIATE CORTEX OF KITTENS DEPRIVED OF VISION IN ONE EYE. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Behzad Mansouri,et al.  A Binocular Approach to Treating Amblyopia: Antisuppression Therapy , 2010, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[20]  D. Maurer,et al.  Developmental changes in attention: the effects of endogenous cueing and of distractors , 2001 .

[21]  David Whitney,et al.  Perceived Positions Determine Crowding , 2011, PloS one.

[22]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[23]  R. F. Hess,et al.  The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: Evidence for a two type classification , 1977, Vision Research.

[24]  J. Atkinson,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF VISUAL ACUITY IN INFANCY AND EARLY CHILDHOOD , 1983, Acta ophthalmologica. Supplementum.

[25]  Paul V McGraw,et al.  Understanding the Neural Basis of Amblyopia , 2004, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[26]  E. Birch,et al.  Validity of the Titmus and Randot circles tasks in children with known binocular vision disorders. , 2003, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[27]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[28]  M C FLOM,et al.  VISUAL RESOLUTION AND CONTOUR INTERACTION. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[29]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Contour interaction in amblyopia: scale selection , 2001, Vision Research.

[30]  J. Sloper,et al.  Effect of age on adult stereoacuity as measured by different types of stereotest , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[31]  G. Chastain,et al.  Feature mislocalizations and misjudgments of intercharacter distance , 1982, Psychological research.

[32]  J. Frisby,et al.  The Role of Monocularly Conspicuous Features in Facilitating Stereopsis from Random-Dot Stereograms , 1975 .

[33]  W. Richards,et al.  Anomalous stereoscopic depth perception. , 1971, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[34]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and amblyopia , 1985, Vision Research.

[35]  S. McKee,et al.  Visual deficits in anisometropia , 2003, Vision Research.

[36]  D M Levi,et al.  Spatio-temporal interactions in anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia. , 1977, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[37]  Lynne Kiorpes,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying amblyopia , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[38]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size , 2002, Vision Research.

[39]  M C FLOM,et al.  Contour Interaction and Visual Resolution: Contralateral Effects , 1963, Science.

[40]  D. Levi,et al.  The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[41]  D. Levi,et al.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  Citlali Pérez Campos,et al.  Supplementary Movie 1 , 2013 .

[43]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Selective losses in binocular vision in anisometropic amblyopes , 1986, Vision Research.

[44]  D M Levi,et al.  Development of Vernier Acuity in Childhood , 1997, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[45]  J Anthony Movshon,et al.  The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[46]  Peter Neri,et al.  Spatial resolution for feature binding is impaired in peripheral and amblyopic vision. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  M. Corballis The left-right problem in psychology. , 1974 .

[48]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[49]  D. Levi Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review , 2008, Vision Research.

[50]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in foveal vision: foveal crowding is simple contrast masking. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[51]  P. Romano,et al.  Stereoacuity degradation by experimental and real monocular and binocular amblyopia. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[52]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Contrast thresholds for sine gratings of children with amblyopia. , 1983, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[53]  Thomas A Carlson,et al.  Crowding is tuned for perceived (not physical) location. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[54]  S. Klein,et al.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in amblyopic vision , 2002, Vision Research.

[55]  U. Polat,et al.  Local and non-local deficits in amblyopia: acuity and spatial interactions , 2004, Vision Research.

[56]  J. Lund,et al.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[57]  G Wolford,et al.  Perturbation model for letter identification. , 1975, Psychological review.

[58]  Increased binocular enhancement of contrast sensitivity and reduced stereoacuity in Duane syndrome. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[59]  Masahiro Takei,et al.  Human resource development and visualization , 2009, J. Vis..

[60]  K. Simons Stereoacuity norms in young children. , 1981, Archives of ophthalmology.

[61]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[62]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Recovery of stereopsis through perceptual learning in human adults with abnormal binocular vision , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  J. Cooper,et al.  Random‐Dot‐Stereogram Performance by Strabismic, Amblyopic, and Ocular‐Pathology Patients in an Operant‐Discrimination Task , 1978, American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics.

[64]  S. Dakin,et al.  Crowding follows the binding of relative position and orientation. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[65]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Bit stealing: how to get 1786 or more gray levels from an 8-bit color monitor , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[66]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Crowding Changes Appearance , 2010, Current Biology.

[67]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  Is the increased spatial uncertainty in the normal periphery due to spatial undersampling or uncalibrated disarray? , 1993, Vision Research.

[68]  J. Stanley,et al.  Pitfalls in testing children's vision by the Sheridan Gardiner single optotype method. , 1972, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[69]  Whitman Richards Stereopsis with and without monocular contours , 1977, Vision Research.

[70]  R. J. Watt,et al.  Spatial information and uncertainty in anisometropic amblyopia , 1987, Vision Research.

[71]  H. Strasburger Unfocused spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[72]  A. Simmers,et al.  Screening for amblyopia: a comparison of paediatric letter tests , 1997, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[73]  Candice E. Clifford-Donaldson,et al.  Associations between anisometropia, amblyopia, and reduced stereoacuity in a school-aged population with a high prevalence of astigmatism. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[74]  D. Maurer,et al.  Developmental changes during childhood in single-letter acuity and its crowding by surrounding contours. , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[75]  Whitman Richards,et al.  Stereopsis and stereoblindness , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[76]  S. Dakin,et al.  Spatial interference among moving targets , 2005, Vision Research.

[77]  T. Hensch Critical period regulation. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[78]  D. Maurer,et al.  Development of spatial and temporal vision during childhood , 1999, Vision Research.

[79]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.