Symmetry of ignorance, social creativity, and meta-design

Complex design problems require more knowledge than any one single person can possess, and the knowledge relevant to a problem is often distributed and controversial. Rather than being a limiting factor, "symmetry of ignorance" can provide the foundation for social creativity. Bringing different points of view together and trying to create a shared understanding among all stakeholders can lead to new insights, new ideas, and new artifacts. Social creativity can be supported by new media that allow owners of problems to contribute to framing and solving these problems. These new media need to be designed from a meta-design perspective by creating environments in which stakeholders can act as designers and be more than consumers.

[1]  Donald A. Schön The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[2]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and Refutations , 1963 .

[3]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Developments in design methodology , 1984 .

[4]  H. W. Rittel,et al.  Second-generation design methods , 1984 .

[5]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Transcending the individual human mind—creating shared understanding through collaborative design , 2000, TCHI.

[6]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  A small matter of programming , 1993 .

[7]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  Lessons from open-source software development , 1999, CACM.

[8]  Shiu-Kai Chin,et al.  High-confidence design for security: don't trust—verify , 1999, CACM.

[9]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[10]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[11]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Putting the Owners of Problems in Charge with Domain-oriented Design Environments , 1994 .

[12]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Learning Technologies in Support of Self-Directed Learning , 1998 .

[13]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Enhancing communication, facilitating shared understanding, and creating better artifacts by integrating physical and computational media for design , 1997, DIS '97.

[14]  E. Hirsch,et al.  The Schools We Need: And Why We Don't Have Them , 1996 .

[15]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[16]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Paradox of the active user , 1987 .

[17]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Supporting learning on demand with design environments , 1991 .

[18]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[19]  David G. Ullman,et al.  Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use , 1997 .

[20]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Beyond "couch potatoes": from consumers to designers , 1998, Proceedings. 3rd Asia Pacific Computer Human Interaction (Cat. No.98EX110).

[21]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Embedding critics in design environments , 1993, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[22]  Paul W. Richardson The culture of education , 1996 .

[23]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Design at Work , 1992 .

[24]  Vannevar Bush,et al.  As we may think , 1945, INTR.

[25]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The Cathedral and the Bazaar , 2000 .

[26]  Henry Petroski,et al.  To Engineer Is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design , 1986 .

[27]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Design rationale: concepts, techniques, and use , 1996 .

[28]  M. Boden The creative mind : myths & mechanisms , 1991 .

[29]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Turning breakdowns into opportunities for creativity , 1994, Knowl. Based Syst..

[30]  Austin Henderson,et al.  There's No Place Like Home: Continuing Design in Use , 1992, Design at Work.

[31]  I. Illich Tools for Conviviality , 1973 .

[32]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things that make us smart , 1979 .

[33]  Linda Candy,et al.  Special issue on Creativity and Cognition , 2000 .

[34]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[35]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Beyond the macho approach of artificial intelligence: empower human designers - do not replace them , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[36]  Douglas C. Engelbart,et al.  Toward augmenting the human intellect and boosting our collective IQ , 1995, CACM.

[37]  Ernesto Arias,et al.  Designing in a design community: insights and challenges , 1995, Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems.

[38]  David J. Gilmore,et al.  User-Centred Requirements for Software Engineering Environments , 1994, NATO ASI Series.

[39]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .