Linguistic information distortion on investment decision-making in the crowdfunding market

PurposeInformation distortion affects the perception of quality, which, in turn, influences investment decisions and determines the pledge results of fundraising. This study combines signalling theory with persuasion theory to empirically study the effects of linguistic information distortion from fraudulent cues on a crowdfunding campaign's fundraising outcomes using text analytics, with implications for entrepreneurs, platforms and investors.Design/methodology/approachThis study empirically analyzes 328,974 crowdfunding projects from the Kickstarter platform. Information distortion is detected using four indicators, based on text mining analytics. An econometric model is built to estimate the impact of information distortion, while the predictive power of the information distortion is detected through machine learning.FindingsThe results inform that distortion in the blurb, detailed description and reward statement dampen a campaign's success, but embellishing the entrepreneur's biography enhances the success of financing. Furthermore, information distortion exhibits a significant inverted U-shaped influence. The effect of the interaction terms suggests that campaigns with high pledge goals are more sensitive to information distortion, and that native-speaking entrepreneurs are adept at applying linguistic skills to promote the campaign.Originality/valueThis study provides a linguistic method to detect the influence of information distortion on crowdfunding campaigns. Further, the study offers some practical suggestions for entrepreneurs on how to generate attractive narratives, and contributes to the investor's decision-making and informs the platform's promotion strategy.

[1]  Wei Chen,et al.  Emphasizing the Entrepreneur or the Idea? The Impact of Text Content Emphasis on Investment Decisions in Crowdfunding , 2020, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  Jarunee Wonglimpiyarat.  Challenges and dynamics of FinTech crowd funding: An innovation system approach , 2018 .

[3]  Yingyi Zhang,et al.  Joint Modeling of Characters, Words, and Conversation Contexts for Microblog Keyphrase Extraction , 2020, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  E. Cardeña,et al.  An examination of the diagnostic validity of dissociative identity disorder. , 2001, Clinical psychology review.

[5]  Shichao Zhang,et al.  Cost-sensitive KNN classification , 2020, Neurocomputing.

[6]  Lynnette D. Purda,et al.  Can Fraudulent Cues Be Transmitted by Innocent Participants? , 2018 .

[7]  M. Spence.  Job Market Signaling , 1973 .

[8]  O. Svenson,et al.  Information about expert decision and post-decision distortion of facts of own decision. , 2018, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[9]  The Spillover Effect of Fraudulent Financial Reporting on Peer Firms’ Investments , 2013 .

[10]  Gert-Jan de Vreede,et al.  Idea Convergence Quality in Open Innovation Crowdsourcing: A Cognitive Load Perspective , 2020, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Endrit Kromidha,et al.  Determinants of leadership in online social trading: A signaling theory perspective , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[12]  Guido Dedene,et al.  Strategies for detecting fraudulent claims in the automobile insurance industry , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[14]  S. Johan,et al.  Is the crowd sensitive to distance?—how investment decisions differ by investor type , 2018 .

[15]  Florian B. Zapkau,et al.  International Entrepreneurship: A Meta–Analysis on the Internationalization and Performance Relationship , 2018, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.

[16]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect , 1997 .

[17]  P. Dell.  The Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation (MID): A Comprehensive Measure of Pathological Dissociation , 2006, Journal of trauma & dissociation : the official journal of the International Society for the Study of Dissociation.

[18]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[19]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness , 1951 .

[20]  J. Block,et al.  Which updates during an equity crowdfunding campaign increase crowd participation? , 2016 .

[21]  Weiqi Wang,et al.  Distance Diffusion of Home Bias for Crowdfunding Campaigns between Categories: Insights from Data Analytics , 2018 .

[22]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[23]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Reality Monitoring , 2005 .

[24]  Athena Vakali,et al.  Sentiment analysis leveraging emotions and word embeddings , 2017 .

[25]  Chun-Ming Chang,et al.  What motivates health information exchange in social media? The roles of the social cognitive theory and perceived interactivity , 2018, Inf. Manag..

[26]  M. Dacin,et al.  Psychological Pathways to Fraud: Understanding and Preventing Fraud in Organizations , 2011 .

[27]  Z. Rezaee.  Causes, consequences, and deterence of financial statement fraud , 2005 .

[28]  R. Craig,et al.  Using retracted journal articles in psychology to understand research misconduct in the social sciences: What is to be done? , 2020, Research Policy.

[29]  J. Porac,et al.  Imagination, Indeterminacy, and Managerial Choice at the Limit of Knowledge , 2020 .

[30]  Gilles Chemla,et al.  Learning Through Crowdfunding , 2020, Manag. Sci..

[31]  L. Vygotsky,et al.  Imagination and Creativity in the Adolescent , 1991 .

[32]  Amrizah Kamaluddin,et al.  Accountability in Financial Reporting: Detecting Fraudulent Firms , 2014 .

[33]  K. Olson.  The role of dissociation in redeeming knowledge claims: nineteenth-century shakers' epistomological resistance to decline , 1995 .

[34]  Ting-Peng Liang,et al.  Why funders invest in crowdfunding projects: Role of trust from the dual-process perspective , 2019, Inf. Manag..

[35]  C. Hall,et al.  What drives visitor economy crowdfunding? The effect of digital storytelling on unified theory of acceptance and use of technology , 2020 .

[36]  P. Dunn.  The Impact of Insider Power on Fraudulent Financial Reporting , 2004 .

[37]  Rabihah Md. Sum,et al.  Crowdfunding: The Two Sided Financing Alternative , 2020, Journal of Technology Management and Business.

[38]  Lauren Shook.  “Pious Fraud”: Genesis Matriarchs and the Typological Imagination in Lucy Hutchinson’s Order and Disorder , 2014, Modern Philology.

[39]  Margaret G. Meloy,et al.  The Distortion of Information during Decisions , 1996 .

[40]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations , 1978 .

[41]  I. Burkitt.  Emotional Reflexivity: Feeling, Emotion and Imagination in Reflexive Dialogues , 2012 .

[42]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[43]  Supradeep Dutta,et al.  Resolving Information Asymmetry: Signaling, Endorsement, and Crowdfunding Success , 2016 .

[44]  Lucio Barabesi,et al.  Goodness-of-Fit Testing for the Newcomb-Benford Law With Application to the Detection of Customs Fraud , 2018 .

[45]  Adrija Majumdar,et al.  My words for your pizza: An analysis of persuasive narratives in online crowdfunding , 2018, Inf. Manag..

[46]  Joseph V. Carcello,et al.  Audit Firm Tenure and Fraudulent Financial Reporting , 2004 .

[47]  R. Brody,et al.  Accountants' perceptions regarding fraud detection and prevention methods , 2006 .

[48]  F. Gul,et al.  The Role of Regulatory Focus and Information in Investment Choice: Some Evidence Using Visual Cues to Frame Regulatory Focus , 2018 .

[49]  Andrea Caputo,et al.  Reviewing cognitive distortions in managerial decision making , 2018, Journal of Management Development.

[50]  Joseph F. Brazel,et al.  Auditors’ Reactions to Inconsistencies between Financial and Nonfinancial Measures: The Interactive Effects of Fraud Risk Assessment and a Decision Prompt , 2014 .

[51]  B. Bayus,et al.  Crowdfunding Creative Ideas: The Dynamics of Project Backers , 2018 .

[52]  Pyayt P. Oo,et al.  Bellwether and the Herd? Unpacking the U-Shaped Relationship between Prior Funding and Subsequent Contributions in Reward-Based Crowdfunding , 2019 .

[53]  S. L. Sporer,et al.  Are Computers Effective Lie Detectors? A Meta-Analysis of Linguistic Cues to Deception , 2015, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[54]  Fadi Dornaika,et al.  Efficient deep discriminant embedding: Application to face beauty prediction and classification , 2020, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[55]  Rebecca Fay,et al.  Electronic Discovery (eDiscovery): Performing the Early Stages of the Enron Investigation , 2020 .

[56]  Anne Beatty,et al.  The Spillover Effect of Fraudulent Financial Reporting on Peer Firms’ Investments , 2013 .

[57]  G. Norris,et al.  Personality, emotion and individual differences in response to online fraud , 2021 .

[58]  Philip M. McCarthy,et al.  The linguistic correlates of conversational deception: Comparing natural language processing technologies , 2010, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[59]  Amy Beth Warriner,et al.  Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[60]  Wei Wang,et al.  The Impact of Sentiment Orientations on Successful Crowdfunding Campaigns through Text Analytics , 2017, IET Softw..

[61]  Yapu Zhao,et al.  Financial fraud contagion through board interlocks: the contingency of status , 2019 .

[62]  O. Klein,et al.  The power of the truth bias: False information affects memory and judgment even in the absence of distraction , 2018 .

[63]  M. McHugh.  Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic , 2012, Biochemia medica.

[64]  Raymond I. Schuck.  What We Aren’t When We Are Penn State: Dissociation Strategies in the Penn State Sexual Abuse Scandal , 2020, Journal of Global Sport Management.

[65]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interpersonal Deception Theory , 1996 .

[66]  Gilles Chemla,et al.  Learning Through Crowdfunding , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[67]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  What Lies Beneath: The Linguistic Traces of Deception in Online Dating Profiles , 2012 .

[68]  Evan Polman.  Information distortion in self-other decision making , 2010 .

[69]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Local Partnering in Foreign Ventures: Uncertainty, Experiential Learning, and Syndication in Cross-Border Venture Capital Investments , 2016 .

[70]  Frank Yu,et al.  Corporate Lobbying and Fraud Detection , 2010, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[71]  Wei Wang,et al.  Cross-domain comparison of algorithm performance in extracting aspect-based opinions from Chinese online reviews , 2016, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[72]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Linguistic Obfuscation in Fraudulent Science , 2016 .

[73]  Frances Scholtz,et al.  Entrepreneurial decision-making: new conceptual perspectives , 2019, Management Decision.

[74]  Affective Responses before and after Fraudulent Excuses by Academic Procrastinators , 1998 .

[75]  M. A. Rees.  Strategic Maneuvering with Dissociation , 2006 .

[76]  Natalie J. Shook,et al.  Fraudulent health claims: Further consideration of the role of emotions. , 2020, Social science & medicine.

[77]  John P. Berns,et al.  Dynamics of Lending-Based Prosocial Crowdfunding: Using a Social Responsibility Lens , 2018, Journal of Business Ethics.