The Effect of Realistic Appearance of Virtual Characters in Immersive Environments - Does the Character's Personality Play a Role?

Virtual characters that appear almost photo-realistic have been shown to induce negative responses from viewers in traditional media, such as film and video games. This effect, described as the uncanny valley, is the reason why realism is often avoided when the aim is to create an appealing virtual character. In Virtual Reality, there have been few attempts to investigate this phenomenon and the implications of rendering virtual characters with high levels of realism on user enjoyment. In this paper, we conducted a large-scale experiment on over one thousand members of the public in order to gather information on how virtual characters are perceived in interactive virtual reality games. We were particularly interested in whether different render styles (realistic, cartoon, etc.) would directly influence appeal, or if a character's personality was the most important indicator of appeal. We used a number of perceptual metrics such as subjective ratings, proximity, and attribution bias in order to test our hypothesis. Our main result shows that affinity towards virtual characters is a complex interaction between the character's appearance and personality, and that realism is in fact a positive choice for virtual characters in virtual reality.

[1]  Alastair J. Gill,et al.  Perception of e-mail personality at zero-acquaintance: Extraversion takes care of itself; Neuroticism is a worry , 2003 .

[2]  Rachel McDonnell,et al.  Don't stand so close to me: investigating the effect of control on the appeal of virtual humans using immersion and a proximity-based behavioral task , 2017, SAP.

[3]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  The saliency of anomalies in animated human characters , 2010, TAP.

[4]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Comparing Behavioral and Self-Report Measures of Embodied Agents' Social Presence in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2004 .

[6]  Mark H. Davis Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. , 1983 .

[7]  L. Ross The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process1 , 1977 .

[8]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Evaluation of real-world and computer-generated stylized facial expressions , 2007, TAP.

[9]  J. Musek A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five-factor model. , 2007 .

[10]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: Developing and validating an alternative to the Godspeed indices , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  Yuki Yamada,et al.  Categorization difficulty is associated with negative evaluation in the “uncanny valley” phenomenon , 2013 .

[12]  Jun'ichiro Seyama,et al.  The Uncanny Valley: Effect of Realism on the Impression of Artificial Human Faces , 2007, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[13]  A. Furnham,et al.  Personality and speech production: a pilot study of second language learners , 2000 .

[14]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Perceptual effects of damped and exaggerated facial motion in animated characters , 2013, 2013 10th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG).

[15]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[16]  L. Jancke,et al.  Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues , 2013, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[17]  K. C. Klauer,et al.  Cognitive methods in social psychology , 2011 .

[18]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  The Right Agent for the Job? - The Effects of Agent Visual Appearance on Task Domain , 2014, IVA.

[19]  Julien Pettré,et al.  Going Through, Going Around: A Study on Individual Avoidance of Groups , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[20]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Unpleasantness of animated characters corresponds to increased viewer attention to faces , 2013, SAP.

[21]  A. Tellegen,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure , 2022 .

[22]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual Environments , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[23]  J. Kätsyri,et al.  A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[24]  S. Gosling,et al.  Personality in its natural habitat: manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Angela Tinwell,et al.  Perception of psychopathy and the Uncanny Valley in virtual characters , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  O. John,et al.  Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. , 2008 .

[27]  Mel Slater,et al.  The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment , 2003, CHI '03.

[28]  Susan Persky,et al.  The Independent and Interactive Effects of Embodied-Agent Appearance and Behavior on Self-Report, Cognitive, and Behavioral Markers of Copresence in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[29]  Mel Slater,et al.  Meeting people vitually: experiments in shared virtual environments , 2002 .

[30]  D. Gilbert,et al.  On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. , 1988 .

[31]  Diego Gutierrez,et al.  To stylize or not to stylize? , 2015, ACM Trans. Graph..

[32]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Digital Chameleons , 2005, Psychological science.

[33]  Sabarish V. Babu,et al.  Effects of Virtual Human Appearance Fidelity on Emotion Contagion in Affective Inter-Personal Simulations , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[34]  J. Loomis,et al.  Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[35]  M. Mori THE UNCANNY VALLEY , 2020, The Monster Theory Reader.

[36]  J. Hodgins,et al.  Anthropomorphism influences perception of computer-animated characters' actions. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[37]  R. Michael Latta,et al.  Relation of Status Incongruence to Personal Space , 1978 .

[38]  J. Blascovich Social influence within immersive virtual environments , 2002 .

[39]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[40]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Render me real? , 2012, ACM Trans. Graph..

[41]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  Rachel McDonnell,et al.  Does render style affect perception of personality in virtual humans? , 2014, SAP.

[43]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual Virgins and Vamps: The Effects of Exposure to Female Characters’ Sexualized Appearance and Gaze in an Immersive Virtual Environment , 2009 .

[44]  V. Groom,et al.  The influence of racial embodiment on racial bias in immersive virtual environments , 2009 .

[45]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The Cambridge Mindreading (CAM) Face-Voice Battery: Testing Complex Emotion Recognition in Adults with and without Asperger Syndrome , 2006, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.