A METHOD TO PREDICT AND UNDERSTAND FISH SURVIVAL UNDER DYNAMIC CHEMICAL STRESS USING STANDARD ECOTOXICITY DATA

The authors present a method to predict fish survival under exposure to fluctuating concentrations and repeated pulses of a chemical stressor. The method is based on toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic modeling using the general unified threshold model of survival (GUTS) and calibrated using raw data from standard fish acute toxicity tests. The model was validated by predicting fry survival in a fish early life stage test. Application of the model was demonstrated by using Forum for Co-ordination of Pesticide Fate Models and Their Use surface water (FOCUS-SW) exposure patterns as model input and predicting the survival of fish over 485 d. Exposure patterns were also multiplied by factors of five and 10 to achieve higher exposure concentrations for fish survival predictions. Furthermore, the authors quantified how far the exposure profiles were below the onset of mortality by finding the corresponding exposure multiplication factor for each scenario. The authors calculated organism recovery times as additional characteristic of toxicity as well as number of peaks, interval length between peaks, and mean duration as additional characteristics of the exposure pattern. The authors also calculated which of the exposure patterns had the smallest and largest inherent potential toxicity. Sensitivity of the model to parameter changes depends on the exposure pattern and differs between GUTS individual tolerance and GUTS stochastic death. Possible uses of the additional information gained from modeling to inform risk assessment are discussed. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2013;32:954–965. © 2013 SETAC

[1]  Walter Schmitt,et al.  Toxicokinetic‐toxicodynamic modeling of quantal and graded sublethal endpoints: A brief discussion of concepts , 2011, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[2]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Toxicokinetic–toxicodynamic modelling in an individual based context—Consequences of parameter variability , 2010 .

[3]  J. Giddings,et al.  Effects analysis of time‐varying or repeated exposures in aquatic ecological risk assessment of agrochemicals , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[4]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic modelling of survival of Gammarus pulex in multiple pulse exposures to propiconazole: model assumptions, calibration data requirements and predictive power , 2012, Ecotoxicology.

[5]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  General unified threshold model of survival--a toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic framework for ecotoxicology. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Modeling combined effects of pulsed exposure to carbaryl and chlorpyrifos on Gammarus pulex. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  New ecotoxicological model to simulate survival of aquatic invertebrates after exposure to fluctuating and sequential pulses of pesticides. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Predicting effects on aquatic organisms from fluctuating or pulsed exposure to pesticides , 2006, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[9]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Environmental Risk Assessment of Fluctuating Diazinon Concentrations in an Urban and Agricultural Catchment Using Toxicokinetic–Toxicodynamic Modeling , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  J. Kreuger.  Pesticides in stream water within an agricultural catchment in southern Sweden, 1990-1996. , 1998, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  W. Greco,et al.  Extrapolation Concepts for Dealing with Multiple Contamination in Environmental Risk Assessment , 2009, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[12]  Sebastiaan A L M Kooijman,et al.  Making Sense of Ecotoxicological Test Results: Towards Application of Process-based Models , 2006, Ecotoxicology.

[13]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Extrapolation methods in aquatic effect assessment of time-variable exposures to pesticides , 2010 .

[14]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Predicting Concentrations of Organic Chemicals in Fish by Using Toxicokinetic Models , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic modeling explains carry-over toxicity from exposure to diazinon by slow organism recovery. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  Some statistical properties of estimates of no-effect concentrations , 1996 .

[17]  Tjalling Jager,et al.  Some good reasons to ban ECx and related concepts in ecotoxicology. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Advantages of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic modelling in aquatic ecotoxicology and risk assessment. , 2010, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[19]  M. Newman,et al.  The theory underlying dose‐response models influences predictions for intermittent exposures , 2007, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[20]  C. Stamm,et al.  Significance of urban and agricultural land use for biocide and pesticide dynamics in surface waters. , 2010, Water research.

[21]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Simulating toxicity of carbaryl to Gammarus pulex after sequential pulsed exposure. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  J. Mckim.  Evaluation of Tests with Early Life Stages of Fish for Predicting Long-Term Toxicity , 1977 .