Wielokryterialne metody wspomagania decyzji w procesie innowacji

[1]  Thierry Marchant,et al.  Cognitive maps and fuzzy implications , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Li Mo,et al.  A TFN-ANP based approach to evaluate Virtual Research Center comprehensive performance , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Causal maps and the evaluation of decision options—a review , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2001 .

[5]  Hsu-Shih Shih,et al.  A business strategy selection of green supply chain management via an analytic network process , 2012, Comput. Math. Appl..

[6]  Grzegorz Ginda,et al.  Identification of building repair policy choice criteria role , 2009 .

[7]  Michael Pidd,et al.  Wisdom, decision support and paradigms of decision making , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Creating the aspired intelligent assessment systems for teaching materials , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Conceptualizing Innovation Orientation: A Framework for Study and Integration of Innovation Research* , 2006 .

[10]  A. Ravi Ravindran,et al.  Operations Research and Management Science Handbook , 2007 .

[11]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[12]  Hans Georg Gemünden,et al.  NPD Planning Activities and Innovation Performance: The Mediating Role of Process Management and the Moderating Effect of Product Innovativeness , 2007 .

[13]  R. Cooper,et al.  0 0 0 0 An Investigation into the New Product Process : Steps , Deficiencies , and Impact , 1986 .

[14]  Chi-Jen Lin,et al.  A causal analytical method for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Aide multicritère à la décision : méthodes et cas , 1993 .

[16]  John Mingers,et al.  Variety is the spice of life: combining soft and hard OR/MS methods , 2000 .

[17]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Problem structuring methods 'in the Dock': Arguing the case for Soft OR , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Ion Georgiou,et al.  Messing about in transformations: Structured systemic planning for systemic solutions to systemic problems , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Mei-Chen Lo,et al.  The assessment of the information quality with the aid of multiple criteria analysis , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Colin Eden,et al.  Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Roger Calantone,et al.  Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in New Product Screening , 1999 .

[23]  John Mingers,et al.  An Idea Ahead of Its Time: The History and Development of Soft Systems Methodology , 2000 .

[24]  Randall L. Englund,et al.  From experience: linking projects to strategy , 1999 .

[25]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Problems, New Solutions: Making Portfolio Management More Effective , 2000 .

[26]  Wei-Wen Wu,et al.  Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Reasoning maps for decision aid: an integrated approach for problem-structuring and multi-criteria evaluation , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[28]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Optimizing the State-Gate Process: What Best-Practice Companies Do-II: Leading Companies Are Creating More Rigorous Go/kill Decision Points and Implementing More Effective Portfolio Management , 2002 .

[29]  Thierry Marchant,et al.  Evaluation and Decision Models with Multiple Criteria: Stepping Stones for the Analyst , 2006 .

[30]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process: Economic, Political, Social and Technological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks , 2013 .

[31]  Jerzy Michnik.  Zależności między kryteriami w wielokryterialnych modelach zarządzania innowacjami. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu = Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics, 2011, Nr 238, s. 80-92 , 2011 .

[32]  A. Meyer,et al.  Management of an international network of industrial R&D laboratories , 1993 .

[33]  K. Clark,et al.  Creating project plans to focus product development. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[34]  Alexis Tsoukiàs,et al.  An explicative model of ‘public’ interorganizational interactions , 1993 .

[35]  Ming-Lang Tseng,et al.  An assessment of cause and effect decision-making model for firm environmental knowledge management capacities in uncertainty , 2010, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[36]  Krzysztof Kania,et al.  Assessment and Choice of Software Solution with the Analytic Network Process Method , 2012, ICEIS.

[37]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[38]  Rod Coombs,et al.  The Management of Technological Innovation , 2002 .

[39]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Optimizing the Stage-Gate Process: What Best-Practice Companies Do—I , 2002 .

[40]  Mehpare Timor,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications , 2010 .

[41]  John Friend,et al.  The Strategic Choice Approach , 2011 .

[42]  Thierry Marchant,et al.  Does the Borda rule provide more than a ranking? , 2000, Soc. Choice Welf..

[43]  Jerzy Michnik,et al.  Weighted Influence Non-linear Gauge System (WINGS) - An analysis method for the systems of interrelated components , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[45]  Edwin H.W. Chan,et al.  ANP model for sustainable Building Energy Efficiency Retrofit (BEER) using Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) for hotel buildings in China , 2013 .

[46]  Ming-Lang Tseng,et al.  Using hybrid MCDM to evaluate the service quality expectation in linguistic preference , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[47]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  Selection of R&D projects in a portfolio , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Engineering Management Society. EMS - 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37139).

[48]  H. Tamura,et al.  Stochastic DEMATEL for structural modeling of a complex problematique for realizing safe, secure and reliable society , 2005, Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology.

[49]  John Mingers,et al.  Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies , 1997 .

[50]  Nikolai Bobylev,et al.  Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of selected underground construction technologies using the analytic network process , 2011 .

[51]  P. Trott.  Innovation Management And New Product Development , 2004 .

[52]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  An approach to ordinal decision making , 1995, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[53]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[54]  J. Mingers,et al.  Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited : problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict , 1989 .

[55]  Maged S. Morcos,et al.  Modelling resource allocation of R&D project portfolios using a multi‐criteria decision‐making methodology , 2008 .

[56]  A. Gabus,et al.  Perceptions of the world problematique: communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility , 1973 .

[57]  Fred S. Roberts,et al.  Applications of the theory of meaningfulness to psychology , 1985 .

[58]  Nachiappan Subramanian,et al.  A review of applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process in operations management , 2012 .

[59]  Thierry Marchant,et al.  Evaluation and Decision Models: A Critical Perspective , 2000 .

[60]  Anita M. McGahan,et al.  How Industries Evolve: Principles for Achieving and Sustaining Superior Performance , 2004 .

[61]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[62]  R. Axelrod.  Structure of decision : the cognitive maps of political elites , 2015 .

[63]  W. Edwards.  How to Use Multi-Attribute Utility Measurement for Social Decision Making , 1976 .

[64]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Qualitative operators for reasoning maps: Evaluating multi-criteria options with networks of reasons , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[65]  Lutz E. Schlange.  Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[66]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Combined DEMATEL techniques with novel MCDM for the organic light emitting diode technology selection , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[67]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks , 2005 .

[68]  R. Rothwell.  Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s , 1992 .

[69]  H. Tamura,et al.  Structural modeling and systems analysis of uneasy factors for realizing safe, secure and reliable society , 2005 .

[70]  O. Larichev.  Cognitive validity in design of decision‐aiding techniques , 1992 .

[71]  Dora Marinova,et al.  Models of Innovation , 2003 .

[72]  Wei-Wen Wu,et al.  Developing global managers' competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[73]  Gilberto Montibeller,et al.  Combining scenario planning and multi-criteria decision analysis in practice , 2006 .

[74]  T. Marchant.  Valued relations aggregation with the borda method , 1996 .

[75]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Product Portfolio Management : Practices and Performance , 1999 .

[76]  Thierry Marchant,et al.  Cardinality and the borda score , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[77]  A. H. Jasiński.  Innowacje i transfer techniki w procesie transformacji. , 2006 .

[78]  PAO-LIEN WEI,et al.  Causal Modeling of Web-Advertising Effects by Improving SEM Based on DEMATEL Technique , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[79]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Introduction to Probability , 2002 .

[80]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Problem structuring methods in action , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..