The (In)Significance of Apparent Viscosity in Full-Scale Municipal Membrane Bioreactors

Abstract Ten pilot and full-scale municipal membrane bioreactor (MBR) plants throughout Europe were investigated during the period 2007–2008 using the Delft Filtration Characterisation method. Next to information on filterability the data also contain the necessary information to determine the apparent viscosity of activated sludge. The aim of this study was to quantify variations in the apparent viscosity of activated sludge in pilot and full-scale municipal MBR plants and correlate them with membrane performance. A statistical analysis was carried out in order to quantify the significance of the correlations between apparent viscosity and activated sludge characteristics. The main factor influencing activated sludge's apparent viscosity was found to be total suspended solids. Temperature was found not to have a direct impact on apparent viscosity within the range of temperatures of the pilot and full-scale municipal MBR plants studied (9.7–27.4°C). In terms of the reversible fouling potential and membrane performance, activated sludge filterability and MBR plant membrane permeability were not statistically affected by activated sludge's apparent viscosity variations. Therefore, even if apparent viscosity plays a major role in terms of oxygen transfer efficiency, it is not relevant when optimising membrane fouling control and membrane performance of current, full-scale municipal MBR applications.

[1]  Fenglin Yang,et al.  Impact of biological constituents and properties of activated sludge on membrane fouling in a novel submerged membrane bioreactor , 2008 .

[2]  K. Kimura,et al.  Influence of suspension viscosity and colloidal particles on permeability of membrane used in membrane bioreactor (MBR). , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[3]  Alfons Vogelpohl,et al.  Wastewater treatment in a biological high-performance system with high biomass concentration , 1995 .

[4]  Pierre R. Bérubé,et al.  Shear profiles inside gas sparged submerged hollow fiber membrane modules , 2007 .

[5]  Guowei Gu,et al.  Sludge rheological and physiological characteristics in a pilot-scale submerged membrane bioreactor , 2007 .

[6]  Christelle Wisniewski,et al.  Physical properties of activated sludge in a submerged membrane bioreactor and relation with membrane fouling , 2007 .

[7]  Sungpyo Hong,et al.  Fouling control in activated sludge submerged hollow fiber membrane bioreactors , 2002 .

[8]  Simon Judd,et al.  Impact of aeration, solids concentration and membrane characteristics on the hydraulic performance of a membrane bioreactor , 2003 .

[9]  Nicolas Roche,et al.  In situ triphasic rheological characterisation of activated sludge, in an aerated bioreactor , 2008 .

[10]  Matthias Kraume,et al.  Filterability of activated sludge in membrane bioreactors , 2002 .

[11]  Kazuo Yamamoto,et al.  Direct Solid-Liquid Separation Using Hollow Fiber Membrane in an Activated Sludge Aeration Tank , 1989 .

[12]  Matthias Kraume,et al.  Rheology of Activated Sludge in Membrane Bioreactors , 2002 .

[13]  Seung Hwan Lee,et al.  Factors affecting the performance of membrane bioreactor for piggery wastewater treatment. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[14]  B. Lesjean,et al.  Survey of the European MBR market: trends and perspectives , 2008 .

[15]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[16]  B. Jefferson,et al.  Fluid hydrodynamics in submerged and sidestream membrane bioreactors. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[17]  Simon Judd,et al.  The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors for Water and Wastewater Treatment , 2006 .

[18]  Zhichao Wu,et al.  Relationship between sludge characteristics and membrane flux determination in submerged membrane bioreactors , 2006 .

[19]  A. Drews,et al.  Impact of MBR flux enhancer on floc size distribution, dewaterability and shear stability , 2009 .

[20]  Philippe Moulin,et al.  Experimental Study of Mass Transfer Phenomena in a Cross Flow Membrane Bioreactor: Aeration and Membrane Separation , 2005 .

[21]  A Pollice,et al.  Membrane bioreactor sludge rheology at different solid retention times. , 2007, Water research.

[22]  C. Wisniewski,et al.  Rheological properties of sMBR sludge under unsteady state conditions , 2010 .

[23]  F. Meng,et al.  Effect of hydraulic retention time on membrane fouling and biomass characteristics in submerged membrane bioreactors , 2007, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[24]  Nicolas Roche,et al.  State-of-the-art: rheological characterisation of wastewater treatment sludge , 2003 .

[25]  R. Zaloum,et al.  Membrane bioreactor treatment of oily wastes from a metal transformation mill , 1994 .

[26]  J.H.J.M. van der Graaf,et al.  Filtration characterisation for assessing MBR performance: three cases compared , 2005 .

[27]  C. Brepols,et al.  An aeration energy model for an immersed membrane bioreactor. , 2008, Water research.

[28]  Pierre Côté,et al.  Immersed membranes activated sludge process applied to the treatment of municipal wastewater , 1998 .

[29]  N Cicek,et al.  Effect of solids retention time on the performance and biological characteristics of a membrane bioreactor. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[30]  Y. Chisti,et al.  Shear rate in stirred tank and bubble column bioreactors , 2006 .

[31]  F. Smith,et al.  COLORIMETRIC METHOD FOR DETER-MINATION OF SUGAR AND RELATED SUBSTANCE , 1956 .

[32]  O. H. Lowry,et al.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. , 1951, The Journal of biological chemistry.