The Effects of the Temporal Placement of Feedback on Performance

The purpose of this pilot study was to compare the effects of the temporal placement of feedback on task performance and skill acquisition. Two temporal placements were examined: feedback immediately after and feedback immediately prior to performance. A two-factor mixed design was used. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups, which differed in the order of condition implementation. Participants performed a computerized data entry task. The primary dependent variable was the number of correctly completed patient records per session. During feedback conditions, participants were provided with individual, graphic feedback and no feedback was provided during baseline. The results of this study indicate no significant differences in performance or the speed of skill acquisition associated with the experimental conditions. Participants indicated a strong preference for any type of feedback over no feedback, as well as a strong preference for feedback prior to performance over feedback after performance.

[1]  J. Fairbank,et al.  Performance feedback in organizational behavior management: A review. , 1981 .

[2]  David T. Goomas,et al.  Business Activity Monitoring: Real-Time Group Goals and Feedback Using an Overhead Scoreboard in a Distribution Center , 2011 .

[3]  Kyehoon Lee,et al.  Relative Effects of Daily Feedback and Weekly Feedback on Customer Service Behavior at a Gas Station , 2013 .

[4]  A. M. Dickinson,et al.  The Effects of Objective Feedback on Performance when Individuals Receive Fixed and Individual Incentive Pay. , 2008 .

[5]  Heather M. McGee,et al.  The Effects of Individual Monetary Incentives With and Without Feedback , 2004 .

[6]  John Annett,et al.  Feedback and Human Behaviour: The Effects of Knowledge of Results, Incentives and Reinforcement on Learning and Performance , 1969 .

[7]  Fabricio E. Balcazar,et al.  A Critical, Objective Review of Performance Feedback , 1985 .

[8]  Phillip Ward,et al.  Effects of public posting, goal setting, and oral feedback on the skills of female soccer players. , 2002, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[9]  L. Frederiksen,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT , 1981 .

[10]  D. Baer,et al.  Training family therapists: an experimental analysis. , 1982, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.

[11]  B. L. Hopkins,et al.  An Objective Review and Analysis of Ten Years of Publication in the Journal of Organizational Behavior Management , 1989 .

[12]  A. M. Dickinson,et al.  A comparison of the effects of two individual monetary incentive systems on productivity: Piece rate pay versus base pay plus incentives , 1994 .

[13]  T. V. Nolan,et al.  An Objective Review of the Journal of Organizational Behavior Management , 1999 .

[14]  B. Sulzer-Azaroff,et al.  Acquisition and maintenance of health-care routines as a function of feedback density. , 1990, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[15]  Robin S. Codding,et al.  Effects of immediate performance feedback on implementation of behavior support plans. , 2005, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[16]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Generalizing From Laboratory to Field Settings. , 1987 .

[17]  Alicia M. Alvero,et al.  An Objective Review of the Effectiveness and Essential Characteristics of Performance Feedback in Organizational Settings (1985-1998) , 2001 .

[18]  D. Mook,et al.  In defense of external invalidity. , 1983 .