Not in My Neighborhood: A User Equipment Perspective of Cellular Planning Under Restrictive EMF Limits

The installation of base station (BS) sites is regulated by a variety of laws at international, national, and local levels. While international regulations are already severe, the national and local laws applied in many countries and regions follow precautionary principles and enforce electromagnetic field (EMF) constraints that are even more restrictive. This legal environment results in substantial constraints affecting the planning of cellular networks, as requests for new BS site installation are easily denied by national or local authorities. In this paper, we consider the problem of cellular planning under restrictive EMF limits from the user equipment (UE) viewpoint. We focus on outdoor urban areas and first evaluate the impact of the current, non-optimal network planning at the UE side through a quantitative measurement-driven analysis of the quality of service (QoS) observed by users in heterogeneous, large-scale urban scenarios. We then perform a qualitative assessment of the perceived QoS and generated EMF levels at one UE transferring data from/to a BS based on its position with respect to the serving BS. Finally, we run a what-if analysis by comparing the existing planning with the one where new BS sites can be installed, thanks to a relaxation of the restrictive EMF constraints. Our results clearly show that a cellular planning driven by restrictive EMF constraints forces UE to experience large distances from the serving BS, frequent non-line-of-sight conditions, and poor received signal. In turn, this entails a very negative combination of high electric field activity (EFA) levels generated by the UE and low QoS perceived by the user. We show that, by relaxing the restrictive EMF constraints, the problem could be sensibly mitigated with a positive impact on the UE channel conditions and consequently on the perceived QoS and the UE EFA.

[1]  P. Ravazzani,et al.  Electromagnetic field exposure assessment in Europe radiofrequency fields (10 MHz–6 GHz) , 2013, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[2]  G. Thuróczy,et al.  Comparison of personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure in different urban areas across Europe. , 2010, Environmental research.

[3]  Rita Enami,et al.  RAIK: Regional analysis with geodata and crowdsourcing to infer key performance indicators , 2018, 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[4]  Ermias Andargie Walelgne,et al.  Correlation-Based Feature Mapping of Crowdsourced LTE Data , 2018, 2018 IEEE 29th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[5]  E. Lunca,et al.  EMF exposure measurements on 4G/LTE mobile communication networks , 2014, 2014 International Conference and Exposition on Electrical and Power Engineering (EPE).

[6]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Effect of cell phone radiofrequency radiation on body temperature in rodents: Pilot studies of the National Toxicology Program's reverberation chamber exposure system , 2018, Bioelectromagnetics.

[7]  Elisabeth Cardis,et al.  Radiofrequency exposure in the French general population: band, time, location and activity variability. , 2009, Environment international.

[8]  M. Blettner,et al.  Residential characteristics and radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposures from bedroom measurements in Germany , 2012, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[9]  Luc Martens,et al.  Temporal trends of radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure in everyday environments across European cities. , 2014, Environmental research.

[10]  Joe Cainey,et al.  Modelling download throughput of LTE networks , 2014, 39th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks Workshops.

[11]  Achilles Boursianis,et al.  Continuous electromagnetic radiation monitoring in the environment: analysis of the results in Greece. , 2012, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[12]  R. Vermeulen,et al.  Residential exposure to RF-EMF from mobile phone base stations: Model predictions versus personal and home measurements. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  Gábor Jánossy,et al.  RF personal exposimetry on employees of elementary schools, kindergartens and day nurseries as a proxy for child exposures. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[14]  Ethan Katz-Bassett,et al.  Mobile Network Performance from User Devices: A Longitudinal, Multidimensional Analysis , 2014, PAM.

[15]  H Kromhout,et al.  Geospatial modelling of electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Markus Rupp,et al.  Deriving Cell Load from RSRQ Measurements , 2018, 2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA).

[17]  Theodoros Samaras,et al.  Spatial and temporal RF electromagnetic field exposure of children and adults in indoor micro environments in Belgium and Greece. , 2013, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[18]  Kris Vanhecke,et al.  Prediction and comparison of downlink electric-field and uplink localised SAR values for realistic indoor wireless planning. , 2014, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[19]  Ajay R. Mishra,et al.  Fundamentals of Cellular Network Planning and Optimisation: 2G/2.5G/3G... Evolution to 4G , 2004 .

[20]  Jörg Ott,et al.  Analyzing throughput and stability in cellular networks , 2018, NOMS 2018 - 2018 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium.

[21]  Michael Dear,et al.  Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome , 1992 .

[22]  G. Vermeeren,et al.  In situ LTE exposure of the general public: Characterization and extrapolation , 2012, Bioelectromagnetics.

[23]  Christian Wietfeld,et al.  Empirical Analysis of the Impact of LTE Downlink Channel Indicators on the Uplink Connectivity , 2016, 2016 IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[24]  Tongning Wu,et al.  A large-scale measurement of electromagnetic fields near GSM base stations in Guangxi, China for risk communication. , 2013, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[25]  Jukka Manner,et al.  Netradar - Measuring the wireless world , 2013, 2013 11th International Symposium and Workshops on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks (WiOpt).

[26]  Yan Shi,et al.  Pre-Crowdsourcing: Predicting Wireless Propagation with Phone-Based Channel Quality Measurements , 2017, MSWiM.

[27]  Preben E. Mogensen,et al.  Verification of 3G and 4G received power measurements in a crowdsourcing Android app , 2016, 2016 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[28]  Aleksandar Neskovic,et al.  Statistical analysis of electromagnetic radiation measurements in the vicinity of GSM/UMTS base station installed on buildings in Serbia. , 2016, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[29]  Carla-Fabiana Chiasserini,et al.  Understanding the present and future of cellular networks through crowdsourced traces , 2017, 2017 IEEE 18th International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM).

[30]  Georg Neubauer,et al.  Temporal and spatial variability of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. , 2009, Environmental research.

[31]  Paolo Grazioso,et al.  The Italian national electromagnetic field monitoring network , 2008, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[32]  Gerardo Di Martino,et al.  Planning 5G Networks Under EMF Constraints: State of the Art and Vision , 2018, IEEE Access.

[33]  Martin Röösli,et al.  EMF Monitoring—Concepts, Activities, Gaps and Options , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[34]  Martin Röösli,et al.  Impact of one’s own mobile phone in stand-by mode on personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure , 2013, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[35]  Martin Röösli,et al.  Use of portable exposure meters for comparing mobile phone base station radiation in different types of areas in the cities of Basel and Amsterdam. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[36]  国際非電離放射線防護委員会 ICNIRP statement on the "Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz)". , 2009, Health physics.

[37]  Stephen Hurley,et al.  Planning effective cellular mobile radio networks , 2002, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[38]  Joe Wiart,et al.  Assessment of Fetal Exposure to 4G LTE Tablet in Realistic Scenarios: Effect of Position, Gestational Age, and Frequency , 2017, IEEE Journal of Electromagnetics, RF and Microwaves in Medicine and Biology.

[39]  Marloes Eeftens,et al.  Personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure measurements in Swiss adolescents. , 2017, Environment international.

[40]  Marco Ajmone Marsan,et al.  Experience: An Open Platform for Experimentation with Commercial Mobile Broadband Networks , 2017, MobiCom.

[41]  Luc Martens,et al.  Assessment of RF Exposures from Emerging Wireless Communication Technologies in Different Environments , 2012, Health physics.

[42]  Jukka Manner,et al.  Mobile network measurements - It's not all about signal strength , 2013, 2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[43]  Mimoza Ibrani,et al.  Narrowband frequency-selective up-link and down-link evaluation of daily personal-exposure induced by wireless operating networks , 2017, Wirel. Networks.

[44]  Carla-Fabiana Chiasserini,et al.  Cellular Network Traces Towards 5G: Usage, Analysis and Generation , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[45]  D. Mandrioli,et al.  Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague‐Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission , 2018, Environmental research.

[46]  Graziano Cerri,et al.  Base-station network planning including environmental impact control , 2004 .

[47]  Joe Wiart,et al.  Duality Between Uplink Local and Downlink Whole-Body Exposures in Operating Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[48]  T. Eikelboom,et al.  Personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements in The Netherlands: exposure level and variability for everyday activities, times of day and types of area. , 2012, Environment international.