Semi discrete discontinuous Galerkin methods and stage-exceeding-order, strong-stability-preserving Runge-Kutta time discretizations

This paper investigates the use of a special class of strong-stability-preserving (SSP) Runge–Kutta time discretization methods in conjunction with discontinuous Galerkin (DG) finite element spatial discretizatons. The class of SSP methods investigated here is defined by the property that the number of stages s is greater than the order k of the method. From analysis, CFL conditions for the linear (L 2 ) stability of the methods defined using the s > k SSP schemes are obtained that are less restrictive than those of the ‘‘standard’’ so-called RKDG methods that use s = k SSP Runge–Kutta schemes. The improvement in the CFL conditions for linear stability of the methods more than offsets the additional work introduced by the increased number of stages. Given that the CFL conditions for linear stability are what must be respected in practice in order to maintain high-order accuracy, the use of the s > k SSP schemes results in RKDG methods that are more efficient than those previously defined. Furthermore, with the application of a slope limiter, the nonlinear stability properties of the forward Euler method and the DG spatial discretization, which have been previously proven, are preserved with these methods under less restrictive CFL conditions than those required for linear stability. Thus, more efficient RKDG methods that possess the same favorable accuracy and stability properties of the ‘‘standard’’ RKDG methods are obtained. Numerical results verify the CFL conditions for stability obtained from analysis and demonstrate the efficiency advantages of these new RKDG methods.

[1]  Steven J. Ruuth,et al.  Optimal Strong-Stability-Preserving Time-Stepping Schemes with Fast Downwind Spatial Discretizations , 2006, J. Sci. Comput..

[2]  Steven J. Ruuth,et al.  High-Order Strong-Stability-Preserving Runge-Kutta Methods with Downwind-Biased Spatial Discretizations , 2004, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[3]  Ethan J. Kubatko,et al.  hp Discontinuous Galerkin methods for advection dominated problems in shallow water flow , 2006 .

[4]  Clinton N Dawson,et al.  A discontinuous Galerkin method for two-dimensional flow and transport in shallow water , 2002 .

[5]  Steven J. Ruuth,et al.  Two Barriers on Strong-Stability-Preserving Time Discretization Methods , 2002, J. Sci. Comput..

[6]  Chi-Wang Shu,et al.  The Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws. IV. The multidimensional case , 1990 .

[7]  San-Yih Lin,et al.  Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Method for Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations , 1993 .

[8]  Inmaculada Higueras,et al.  On Strong Stability Preserving Time Discretization Methods , 2004, J. Sci. Comput..

[9]  Stephen J. Thomas,et al.  A Discontinuous Galerkin Global Shallow Water Model , 2005, Monthly Weather Review.

[10]  Guy Chavent,et al.  The local projection P 0 − P 1 -discontinuous-Galerkin finite element method for scalar conservation laws , 2009 .

[11]  Steven J. Ruuth,et al.  A New Class of Optimal High-Order Strong-Stability-Preserving Time Discretization Methods , 2002, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[12]  Bernardo Cockburn,et al.  The Runge-Kutta local projection P1-discontinuous-Galerkin finite element method for scalar conservation laws , 1988 .

[13]  S. Osher,et al.  Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes,II , 1989 .

[14]  J. Kraaijevanger Contractivity of Runge-Kutta methods , 1991 .

[15]  Chi-Wang Shu,et al.  TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous galerkin finite element method for conservation laws. II: General framework , 1989 .

[16]  G. Chavent,et al.  The local projection P0-P1-discontinuous-Galerkin finite element method for scalar conservation laws , 1989 .

[17]  Steven J. Ruuth Global optimization of explicit strong-stability-preserving Runge-Kutta methods , 2005, Math. Comput..

[18]  Chi-Wang Shu,et al.  Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemes , 1998, Math. Comput..

[19]  Sigal Gottlieb,et al.  On High Order Strong Stability Preserving Runge–Kutta and Multi Step Time Discretizations , 2005, J. Sci. Comput..

[20]  Chi-Wang Shu,et al.  The Runge-Kutta local projection $P^1$-discontinuous-Galerkin finite element method for scalar conservation laws , 1988, ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis.

[21]  Gerald Warnecke,et al.  A Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method for the Euler equations , 2005 .

[22]  Chi-Wang Shu,et al.  Strong Stability-Preserving High-Order Time Discretization Methods , 2001, SIAM Rev..

[23]  J. Butcher The numerical analysis of ordinary differential equations: Runge-Kutta and general linear methods , 1987 .

[24]  Chi-Wang Shu,et al.  Runge–Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Convection-Dominated Problems , 2001, J. Sci. Comput..

[25]  Jean-François Remacle,et al.  An Adaptive Discontinuous Galerkin Technique with an Orthogonal Basis Applied to Compressible Flow Problems , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[26]  Peng Zhang,et al.  Generalization of Runge‐Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method to LWR traffic flow model with inhomogeneous road conditions , 2005 .

[27]  Monika Wierse,et al.  A new theoretically motivated higher order upwind scheme on unstructured grids of simplices , 1997, Adv. Comput. Math..

[28]  Steven J. Ruuth,et al.  Non-linear evolution using optimal fourth-order strong-stability-preserving Runge-Kutta methods , 2003, Math. Comput. Simul..

[29]  Dirk Schwanenberg,et al.  Discontinuous Galerkin Finite-Element Method for Transcritical Two-Dimensional Shallow Water Flows , 2004 .