A Laboratory Study of the Effects of Interbeds on Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Shale Formation

To investigate how the characteristics of interbeds affect hydraulic fracture propagation in the continental shale formation, a series of 300 mm × 300 mm × 300 mm concrete blocks with varying interbeds, based on outcrop observation and core measurement of Chang 7-2 shale formation, were prepared to conduct the hydraulic fracturing experiments. The results reveal that the breakdown pressure increases with the rise of thickness and strength of interbeds under the same in-situ field stress and injection rate. In addition, for the model blocks with thick and high strength interbeds, the hydraulic fracture has difficulty crossing the interbeds and is prone to divert along the bedding faces, and the fracturing effectiveness is not good. However, for the model blocks with thin and low strength interbeds, more long branches are generated along the main fracture, which is beneficial to the formation of the fracture network. What is more, combining the macroscopic descriptions with microscopic observations, the blocks with thinner and lower strength interbeds tend to generate more micro-fractures, and the width of the fractures is relatively larger on the main fracture planes. Based on the experiments, it is indicated that the propagation of hydraulic fractures is strongly influenced by the characteristics of interbeds, and the results are instructive to the understanding and evaluation of the fracability in the continental shale formation.

[1]  Li Shuangyang,et al.  ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION RULE OF GEOSTRESS IN CHINA , 2007 .

[2]  C. J. de Pater,et al.  Experiments and numerical simulation of hydraulic fracturing in naturally fractured rock , 2005 .

[3]  Xuan Tang,et al.  Upper Paleozoic coal measures and unconventional natural gas systems of the Ordos Basin, China , 2012 .

[4]  Luo Pen,et al.  Reservoir Characteristics and Potential Evaluation of Continental Shale Gas , 2013 .

[5]  Xin Wang,et al.  Large-Scale Physical Simulation Experiment Research for Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale , 2015 .

[6]  Yoshiaki Mizuta,et al.  Influence of Fluid Viscosity on the Hydraulic Fracturing Mechanism , 2004 .

[7]  T. L. Blanton Propagation of Hydraulically and Dynamically Induced Fractures in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs , 1986 .

[8]  Tsuyoshi Ishida,et al.  AE monitoring of Hydraulic Fracturing Experiments in Granite Blocks Using supercritical Co 2 , Water and Viscous Oil , 2014 .

[9]  Norman R. Warpinski,et al.  Influence of Geologic Discontinuities on Hydraulic Fracture Propagation (includes associated papers 17011 and 17074 ) , 1984 .

[10]  Xiong Jian,et al.  Investigation of pore structure and fractal characteristics of organic-rich Yanchang formation shale in central China by nitrogen adsorption/desorption analysis , 2015 .

[11]  Tomoya Niwa,et al.  AE Monitoring of Hydraulic Fracturing Laboratory Experi-ment With Supercritical And Liquid State CO2 , 2012 .

[12]  P. T. Branagan,et al.  An Interpretation of M-Site Hydraulic Fracture Diagnostic Results , 1998 .

[13]  Mohammad Sarmadivaleh,et al.  Experimental and numerical study of interaction of a pre-existing natural interface and an induced hydraulic fracture , 2012 .

[14]  Leen Weijers,et al.  Experimental Verification of Dimensional Analysis for Hydraulic Fracturing , 1994 .

[15]  H.A.M. van Eekelen,et al.  Hydraulic Fracture Geometry: Fracture Containment in Layered Formations , 1982 .

[16]  Leen Weijers,et al.  Understanding Hydraulic Fracture Growth: Tricky but Not Hopeless , 1999 .

[17]  C. J. de Pater,et al.  Experimental Study of Hydraulic Fracture Initiation in Colton Sandstone , 2002 .

[18]  Xuan Tang,et al.  Shale characteristics in the southeastern Ordos Basin, China: Implications for hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and the potential of continental shales , 2014 .

[19]  J. Curtis Fractured shale-gas systems , 2002 .

[20]  Vamegh Rasouli,et al.  Test Design and Sample Preparation Procedure for Experimental Investigation of Hydraulic Fracturing Interaction Modes , 2014, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[21]  K. Sato,et al.  Experimental Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in a Multi-Fractured Medium , 2000 .

[22]  Emmanuel M Detournay,et al.  An in-situ thermo-hydraulic experiment in a saturated granite I: Design and results , 2004 .

[23]  Zhiheng Zhao,et al.  Numerical Evaluation and Optimization of Multiple Hydraulically Fractured Parameters Using a Flow-Stress-Damage Coupled Approach , 2016 .

[24]  Chunfang Meng,et al.  Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Pre-Fractured Natural Rocks , 2010 .

[25]  Himanshu Yadav,et al.  Hydraulic fracturing in naturally fractured reservoirs and the impact of geomechanics on microseismicity , 2011 .

[26]  Norman R. Warpinski,et al.  Interface test series: an in situ study of factors affecting the containment of hydraulic fractures , 1982 .

[27]  Robert G. Jeffrey,et al.  An Analysis of Hydraulic Fracture and Mineback Data for a Treatment in the German Creek Coal Seam , 1992 .

[28]  Jon E. Olson,et al.  Examining Hydraulic Fracture: Natural Fracture Interaction in Hydrostone Block Experiments , 2012 .

[29]  Ruilin Hu,et al.  Effects of laminated structure on hydraulic fracture propagation in shale , 2015 .

[30]  Jon E. Olson,et al.  Examining the Effect of Cemented Natural Fractures on Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Hydrostone Block Experiments , 2012 .

[31]  Xiaorong Luo,et al.  Characteristics of silty laminae in Zhangjiatan Shale of southeastern Ordos Basin, China: Implications for shale gas formation , 2015 .