Comparing high-end and low-end early adopters of battery electric vehicles

Battery electric vehicle adoption research has been on going for two decades. The majority of data gathered thus far is taken from studies that sample members of the general population and not actual adopters of the vehicles. This paper presents findings from a study involving 340 adopters of battery electric vehicles. The data is used to corroborate some existing assumptions made about early adopters. The contribution of this paper, however, is the distinction between two groups of adopters. These are high-end adopters and low-end adopters. It is found that each group has a different socio-economic profile and there are also some psychographic differences. Further they have different opinions of their vehicles with high-end adopters viewing their vehicles more preferentially. The future purchase intentions of each group are explored and it is found that high-end adopters are more likely to continue with ownership of battery electric vehicles in subsequent purchases. Finally reasons for this are explored by comparing each adopter group’s opinions of their vehicles to their future purchase intentions. From this is it suggested that time to refuel and range for low-end battery electric vehicles should be improved in order to increase chances of drivers continuing with BEV ownership.

[1]  Suzanna Long,et al.  Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions , 2012 .

[2]  R. Steinberger‐Wilckens,et al.  Changing the fate of Fuel Cell Vehicles: Can lessons be learnt from Tesla Motors? , 2015 .

[3]  Daniel Sperling,et al.  Testing Electric Vehicle Demand in `Hybrid Households' Using a Reflexive Survey , 1996 .

[4]  Michael Nicholas,et al.  Studying the PEV market in california: Comparing the PEV, PHEV and hybrid markets , 2013, 2013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS27).

[5]  Madlen Günther,et al.  Does range matter? Exploring perceptions of electric vehicles with and without a range extender among potential early adopters in Germany , 2015 .

[6]  D. Horst,et al.  Disruptive innovations: The case for hydrogen fuel cells and battery electric vehicles , 2013 .

[7]  P. Plötz,et al.  Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany , 2014 .

[8]  Johan Jansson,et al.  Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda , 2015 .

[9]  B. Wee,et al.  The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption , 2014 .

[10]  Meryl P. Gardner,et al.  Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes , 2011 .

[11]  I. Neumann,et al.  Experiencing Range in an Electric Vehicle: Understanding Psychological Barriers , 2012 .

[12]  Thomas S Turrentine,et al.  The UC Davis MINI E Consumer Study , 2011 .

[13]  Charles Abraham,et al.  Mainstream consumers driving plug-in battery-electric and plug-in hybrid electric cars: A qualitative analysis of responses and evaluations , 2012 .

[14]  Jamie Davies,et al.  I am not an environmental wacko! Getting from early plug-in vehicle owners to potential later buyers , 2015 .

[15]  D. Sperling,et al.  Demand for Electric Vehicles in Hybrid Households: An Exploratory Analysis , 1994 .

[16]  Mark Bradley,et al.  Commercial fleet demand for alternative-fuel vehicles in California , 1996 .

[17]  Jamie Davies,et al.  Charging Behavior Impacts on Electric Vehicle Miles Traveled , 2014 .

[18]  Thomas Franke,et al.  Is EV experience related to EV acceptance? Results from a German field study , 2014 .

[19]  John D. Graham,et al.  Effects of providing total cost of ownership information on consumers’ intent to purchase a hybrid or plug-in electric vehicle , 2015 .

[20]  Caspar G. Chorus,et al.  Consumer preferences for alternative fuel vehicles: Comparing a utility maximization and a regret minimization model , 2013 .

[21]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Will subsidies drive electric vehicle adoption? Measuring consumer preferences in the U.S. and China , 2015 .

[22]  R. H. Thring,et al.  Identifying the Early Adopters of Alternative Fuel Vehicles: A Case Study of Birmingham, United Kingdom , 2012 .

[23]  Brian Caulfield,et al.  How should barriers to alternative fuels and vehicles be classified and potential policies to promote innovative technologies be evaluated , 2012 .

[24]  Joeri Van Mierlo,et al.  Environmental impacts of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and battery electric vehicles—what can we learn from life cycle assessment? , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[25]  Rachel M. Krause,et al.  Intent to Purchase a Plug-In Electric Vehicle: A Survey of Early Impressions in Large US Cites , 2013 .

[26]  Jillian Anable,et al.  The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles , 2013 .

[27]  M. Koetse,et al.  Preferences for alternative fuel vehicles of company car drivers , 2014 .

[28]  Joseph S. Krupa,et al.  Analysis of a consumer survey on plug-in hybrid electric vehicles , 2014 .

[29]  C. Merle Crawford,et al.  New Products Management , 1983 .

[30]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[31]  Sebastian Seebauer,et al.  Technology adoption of electric bicycles: A survey among early adopters , 2014 .

[32]  John D. Graham,et al.  Beyond Early Adopters of Plug-in Electric Vehicles? Evidence from Fleet and Household Users in Indianapolis , 2014 .

[33]  E. Dütschke,et al.  How do Consumers Perceive Electric Vehicles? A Comparison of German Consumer Groups , 2014 .

[34]  B Phillips,et al.  Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. , 1993, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[35]  M J Scherer,et al.  Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. , 1996, Disability and rehabilitation.

[36]  Martin Wietschel,et al.  What is the market potential of electric vehicles as commercial passenger cars? A case study from Germany , 2015 .

[37]  鄭宇庭 行銷硏究 : Marketing research , 2009 .

[38]  C. E. Thomas,et al.  Fuel cell and battery electric vehicles compared , 2009 .

[39]  Andreas Poullikkas,et al.  Sustainable options for electric vehicle technologies , 2015 .

[40]  Nigel P. Brandon,et al.  Techno-economic and behavioural analysis of battery electric, hydrogen fuel cell and hybrid vehicles in a future sustainable road transport system in the UK , 2011 .