Comparing policy routes for low-carbon power technology deployment in EU – an energy system analysis

The optimization energy system model JRC-EU-TIMES is used to support energy technology R&D design by analysing power technologies deployment till 2050 and their sensitivity to different decarbonisation exogenous policy routes. The policy routes are based on the decarbonised scenarios of the EU Energy Roadmap 2050 combining energy efficiency, renewables, nuclear or carbon capture and storage (CCS). A "reference" and seven decarbonised scenarios are modelled for EU28. We conclude on the importance of policy decisions for the configuration of the low carbon power sector, especially on nuclear acceptance and available sites for new RES plants. Differently from typical analysis focussing on technology portfolio for each route, we analyse the deployment of each technology across policy routes, for optimising technology R&D. R&D priority should be given to those less-policy-sensitive technologies that are in any case deployed rapidly across the modelled time horizon (e.g. PV), but also to those deployed up to their technical potentials and typically less sensitive to exogenous policy routes. For these ‘no regret’ technologies (e.g. geothermal), R&D efforts should focus on increasing their technical potential. For possibly cost-effective technologies very sensitive to the policy routes (e.g. CSP and marine), R&D efforts should be directed to improving their techno-economic performance.

[1]  Pantelis Capros,et al.  European decarbonisation pathways under alternative technological and policy choices: A multi-model analysis☆ , 2014 .

[2]  Pantelis Capros,et al.  Model-based analysis of decarbonising the EU economy in the time horizon to 2050 , 2012 .

[3]  M. Haller,et al.  Decarbonization scenarios for the EU and MENA power system: Considering spatial distribution and short term dynamics of renewable generation , 2012 .

[4]  Bert Saveyn,et al.  Economic Assessment of Post-2012 Global Climate Policies - Analysis of Gas Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Scenarios with the POLES and GEM-E3 models , 2009 .

[5]  G. Migliavacca,et al.  Effects of North-African electricity import on the European and the Italian power systems: a techno-economic analysis , 2013 .

[6]  Michael Hübler,et al.  The EU Decarbonisation Roadmap 2050: What Way to Walk? , 2013 .

[7]  Richard L. Ottinger,et al.  Compendium of Sustainable Energy Laws: Directive 2001/77/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2001 on the Promotion of Electricity Produced from Renewable Energy Sources in the Internal Electricity Market , 2005 .

[8]  Pantelis Capros,et al.  Transformations of the energy system in the context of the decarbonisation of the EU economy in the , 2012 .

[9]  Michaela Fürsch,et al.  Decarbonizing Europe's power sector by 2050 — Analyzing the economic implications of alternative decarbonization pathways , 2013 .

[10]  Richard L. Ottinger,et al.  Compendium of Sustainable Energy Laws: Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC , 2005 .