The Use of Technology to Support Precision Health in Nursing Science.

PURPOSE This article outlines how current nursing research can utilize technology to advance symptom and self-management science for precision health and provides a roadmap for the development and use of technologies designed for this purpose. APPROACH At the 2018 annual conference of the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) Research Centers, nursing and interdisciplinary scientists discussed the use of technology to support precision health in nursing research projects and programs of study. Key themes derived from the presentations and discussion were summarized to create a proposed roadmap for advancement of technologies to support health and well-being. CONCLUSIONS Technology to support precision health must be centered on the user and designed to be desirable, feasible, and viable. The proposed roadmap is composed of five iterative steps for the development, testing, and implementation of technology-based/enhanced self-management interventions. These steps are (a) contextual inquiry, focused on the relationships among humans, and the tools and equipment used in day-to-day life; (b) value specification, translating end-user values into end-user requirements; (c) design, verifying that the technology/device can be created and developing the prototype(s); (d) operationalization, testing the intervention in a real-world setting; and (e) summative evaluation, collecting and analyzing viability metrics, including process data, to evaluate whether the technology and the intervention have the desired effect. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Interventions using technology are increasingly popular in precision health. Use of a standard multistep process for the development and testing of technology is essential.

[1]  Robert A. Virzi,et al.  Refining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects Is Enough? , 1992 .

[2]  Suzanne Bakken,et al.  The Promise and Potential Perils of Big Data for Advancing Symptom Management Research in Populations at Risk for Health Disparities , 2016, Annual Review of Nursing Research.

[3]  Ritch Macefield,et al.  How to specify the participant group size for usability studies: a practitioner's guide , 2009 .

[4]  James Agutter,et al.  Development of the Electronic Social Network Assessment Program Using the Center for eHealth and Wellbeing Research Roadmap , 2017, JMIR human factors.

[5]  Richard Coyne,et al.  Models, Metaphors and the Hermeneutics of Designing , 1992 .

[6]  P. Carayon,et al.  SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients , 2013, Ergonomics.

[7]  D. J. McCloskey,et al.  Precision health: Advancing symptom and self-management science. , 2019, Nursing outlook.

[8]  Alan E. Kazdin,et al.  Therapy outcome questions requiring control of credibility and treatment-generated expectancies* , 1979 .

[9]  Mick McGee,et al.  The Rapid Iterative Test and Evaluation Method: Better Products in Less Time , 2005 .

[10]  Facilitating pediatric patient-provider communications using wireless technology in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease. , 2013, Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners.

[11]  G. Devilly,et al.  Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire. , 2000, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[12]  Joseph A. Cafazzo,et al.  mHealth consumer apps: the case for user-centered design. , 2012, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[13]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Usability in the real world: assessing medical information technologies in patients' homes , 2003, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[14]  M. Wolf,et al.  Literacy disparities in patient access and health‐related use of Internet and mobile technologies , 2015, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[15]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[16]  N. Gordon,et al.  Older adults’ readiness to engage with eHealth patient education and self-care resources: a cross-sectional survey , 2016, BMC Health Services Research.

[17]  M. Fendrich,et al.  Effect of a nurse case management intervention for hypertension self-management in low-income African Americans. , 2018, Contemporary clinical trials.

[18]  L. Morales,et al.  A Digital Language Divide? The Relationship between Internet Medication Refills and Medication Adherence among Limited English Proficient (LEP) Patients , 2018, Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities.

[19]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[20]  P. Grady Advancing Science, Improving Lives: NINR's New Strategic Plan and the Future of Nursing Science. , 2017, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[21]  George Demiris,et al.  The use of think-aloud and instant data analysis in evaluation research: Exemplar and lessons learned , 2015, J. Biomed. Informatics.