Individuals with diabetes preferred that future trials use patient-important outcomes and provide pragmatic inferences.

[1]  T. Beebe,et al.  Are lower response rates hazardous to your health survey? An analysis of three state telephone health surveys. , 2010, Health services research.

[2]  G. Guyatt,et al.  A new 'mechanistic-practical" framework for designing and interpreting randomized trials. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  Maggie Breslin,et al.  The design of a decision aid about diabetes medications for use during the consultation with patients with type 2 diabetes. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[4]  Michael E. Miller,et al.  Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  Patient-important outcomes in registered diabetes trials. , 2008, JAMA.

[6]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  Development and Validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) , 2005, Medical care.

[7]  Stanley Presser,et al.  Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse over the Past Quarter Century , 2005 .

[8]  D A Asch,et al.  Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  M. Özkaya,et al.  Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes , 2013 .

[10]  S. Schinner.  Intensive Blood Glucose Control and Vascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes , 2009 .

[11]  A. Jakob.  Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 Diabetes , 2008 .

[12]  R. Groves.  Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys , 2006 .