Assessors' use of personality traits in descriptions of assessment centre candidates: A five-factor model perspective

In assessment centres assessors are typically taught to note down behavioural observations. However, previous studies have shown that about 20% of assessor notes contain trait descriptors. Instead of regarding these descriptors as errors, this study examines their position in a personality descriptive taxonomy (i.e. the AB5C taxonomy, see Hofstee, De Raad, & Goldberg, 1992) and relates them to employment recommendations. To this end, assessor notes of 403 assessees (214 men, 189 women; mean age 33 years) were scrutinized for personality descriptors. Results show that assessors, as a group, use descriptors referring to all five personality domains with a preference for positive Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability terms. The distribution of the Big Five categories differs across assessors and particularly across assessment centre exercises. Finally, three of the Big Five factors, namely Extraversion, Conscientiousness, and Openness, are related to the final employment recommendation.

[1]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relative importance of personality and general mental ability in managers' judgments of applicant qualifications. , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  George C. Thornton,et al.  Assessment Centers in Human Resource Management , 1992 .

[3]  I. Mervielde Validity of results obtained by analysing free personality descriptions , 1998 .

[4]  Michael M. Harris,et al.  The Measurement of Assessment Center Situations: Bem's Template Matching Technique for Examining Exercise Similarity , 1993 .

[5]  Newell K. Eaton,et al.  Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities , 1990 .

[6]  J. Burger,et al.  PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF JOB APPLICANTS AND SUCCESS IN SCREENING INTERVIEWS , 1998 .

[7]  Filip De Fruyt,et al.  RIASEC TYPES AND BIG FIVE TRAITS AS PREDICTORS OF EMPLOYMENT STATUS AND NATURE OF EMPLOYMENT , 1999 .

[8]  G. Scholz,et al.  Das nomologische Netzwerk des Assessment Centers: eine Metaanalyse , 1993 .

[9]  Frank Bernhard Brokken,et al.  The language of personality , 1978 .

[10]  Charles F. Halverson,et al.  Parental Descriptions of Child Personality : Developmental Antecedents of the Big Five? , 1998 .

[11]  Robert M. Guion,et al.  Assessment, Measurement, and Prediction for Personnel Decisions , 1997 .

[12]  F. Lievens,et al.  Assessor training strategies and their effects on accuracy, interrater reliability, and discriminant validity. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  J. Salgado The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Task Force on Assessment Center Guidelines Guidelines and ethical considerations for Assessment Center operations , 1989 .

[16]  P. Costa,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) , 1992 .

[17]  R. Goffin,et al.  Personality testing and the assessment center : Incremental validity for managerial selection , 1996 .

[18]  F. Lievens Factors which Improve the Construct Validity of Assessment Centers: A Review , 1998 .

[19]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[20]  George C. Thornton,et al.  Number of assessment center dimensions as a determinant of assessor accuracy. , 1989 .

[21]  A. Furnham,et al.  Validating the NEO Personality Inventory using assessor's ratings , 1997 .

[22]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Relative Importance of Personality Dimensions for Expatriate Selection: A Policy Capturing Study , 1999 .