The influence of third-body particles on wear rate in unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a wear simulator study with bone and cement debris

[1]  D. Naudie,et al.  Unicompartmental Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty Database Analysis: Is There a Winner? , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  C. Schröder,et al.  Biotribology of alternative bearing materials for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[3]  S. Affatato,et al.  Bi-unicondylar knee prosthesis functional assessment utilizing force-control wear testing , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[4]  D W Murray,et al.  Polyethylene wear in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a retrieval study of 47 bearings. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  T. Grupp,et al.  [Preclinical evaluation of coated knee implants for allergic patients]. , 2010, Der Orthopade.

[6]  L. Hovy,et al.  Präklinische Ergebnisse beschichteter Knieimplantate für Allergiker , 2010, Der Orthopäde.

[7]  C. Glaser,et al.  Free bone cement fragments after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an underappreciated problem , 2008, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[8]  J. Bellemans,et al.  Analysis of third body particles generated during total knee arthroplasty: is metal debris an issue? , 2008, The Knee.

[9]  B. Levy,et al.  Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: literature review. , 2007, Orthopedics.

[10]  D. Murray,et al.  Simultaneous in vitro measurement of patellofemoral kinematics and forces following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  R. Jinnah,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty: the future. , 2006, Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances.

[12]  J. Goodfellow,et al.  [Medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the "Oxford Uni" meniscal bearing knee]. , 2004, Der Orthopade.

[13]  S. Breusch,et al.  Die mediale Schlittenprothese mit mobilem Polyethylenmeniskus , 2004, Der Orthopäde.

[14]  M. John,et al.  Clinical outcomes in the revision of unicondylar arthoplasties to bicondylar arthroplasties. A matched-pair study , 2004, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[15]  Amy B Zavatsky,et al.  Simultaneous in vitro measurement of patellofemoral kinematics and forces. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[16]  P. Müller,et al.  Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  A. Wang,et al.  Ceramic femoral heads prevent runaway wear for highly crosslinked polyethylene acetabular cups by third-body bone cement particles , 2003 .

[18]  Roy D. Crowninshield,et al.  In vitro lateral versus medial wear of a knee prosthesis , 2003 .

[19]  J. Newman,et al.  A comparative study of the medial St Georg sled and kinematic total knee arthroplasties. Ten-year survivorship. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  J. Planell,et al.  Mechanical performance of acrylic bone cements containing different radiopacifying agents. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[21]  D W Murray,et al.  Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  R. Scott,et al.  Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Long-Term Results , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  D D Auger,et al.  Wear of fixed bearing and rotating platform mobile bearing knees subjected to high levels of internal and external tibial rotation , 2001, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[24]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Methodology for Long-Term Wear Testing of Total Knee Replacements , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.