Detecting Emerging Activity-Based Working Traits through Wearable Technology

A recent trend in corporate real-estate is Activity-Based Working (ABW). The ABW concept removes designated desks but offers different work settings designed to support typical work activities. In this context there is still a need for objective data to understand the implications of these design decisions. We aim to contribute by using automated data collection to study how ABW’s principles impact office usage and dynamics. To this aim we analyse team dynamics and employees’ tie strength in relation to space usage and organisational hierarchy using data collected with wearable devices in a company adopting ABW principles. Our findings show that the office fosters interactions across team boundaries and among the lower levels of the hierarchy suggesting a strong lateral communication. Employees also tend to have low space exploration on a daily basis which is instead more prevalent during an average week and strong social clusters seem to be resisting the ABW principles of space dynamics. With the availability of two additional data sets about social encounters in traditional offices we highlight traits emerging from the application of ABW’s principles. In particular, we observe how the absence of designated desks might be responsible for more rapid dynamics inside the office. In more general terms, this work opens the door to new and scalable technology-based methodologies to study dynamic office usage and social interactions.

[1]  Kyriaki Kalimeri,et al.  Inferring social activities with mobile sensor networks , 2013, ICMI '13.

[2]  Nicu Sebe,et al.  The SocioMetric Badges Corpus: A Multilevel Behavioral Dataset for Social Behavior in Complex Organizations , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing.

[3]  Nathan Eagle,et al.  Persistence and periodicity in a dynamic proximity network , 2012, ArXiv.

[4]  Piotr Sapiezynski,et al.  Measuring Large-Scale Social Networks with High Resolution , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  Julie Fournet,et al.  Data on face-to-face contacts in an office building suggest a low-cost vaccination strategy based on community linkers , 2014, Network Science.

[6]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Reality mining: sensing complex social systems , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[7]  Philipp Scholl,et al.  Exploring space syntax on entrepreneurial opportunities with Wi-Fi analytics , 2016, UbiComp.

[8]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  Informal Networks and Organizational Crises: An Experimental Simulation , 1988 .

[9]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Sensible Organizations: Technology and Methodology for Automatically Measuring Organizational Behavior , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[10]  F. Wilcoxon Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[11]  Ahmed Lbath,et al.  Crowdsensing traces using bluetooth low energy (BLE) proximity tags , 2014, UbiComp Adjunct.

[12]  Pan Hui,et al.  Pocket switched networks and human mobility in conference environments , 2005, WDTN '05.

[13]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Estelle Brodman,et al.  Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (Book Review) , 1978 .

[15]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Choosing where to work at work – towards a theoretical model of benefits and risks of activity-based flexible offices , 2017, Ergonomics.

[16]  Alan Penn,et al.  The Space of Innovation: Interaction and Communication in the Work Environment , 1999 .

[17]  Ciro Cattuto,et al.  Dynamics of Person-to-Person Interactions from Distributed RFID Sensor Networks , 2010, PloS one.

[18]  Phillip Jeffrey,et al.  Sharing serendipity in the workplace , 2000, CVE '00.

[19]  Ian McCulloh,et al.  Social networks and spatial configuration - How office layouts drive social interaction , 2012, Soc. Networks.

[20]  Geehyuk Lee,et al.  Mining social relationship types in an organization using communication patterns , 2013, CSCW.

[21]  Tjeerd W. Boonstra,et al.  Mapping dynamic social networks in real life using participants' own smartphones , 2015, Heliyon.

[22]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  Tracking serendipitous interactions: how individual cultures shape the office , 2013, CSCW.

[23]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Management innovation , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[24]  Christina Bodin Danielsson,et al.  Office Type in Relation to Health, Well-Being, and Job Satisfaction Among Employees , 2008 .

[25]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[26]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  A Study of Bluetooth Low Energy performance for human proximity detection in the workplace , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom).

[27]  H.A.J.A. Appel Meulenbroek,et al.  An end user’s perspective on activity-based office concepts , 2011 .

[28]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  The architecture of innovation: tracking face-to-face interactions with ubicomp technologies , 2014, UbiComp.

[29]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Colocation and Scientific Collaboration: Evidence from a Field Experiment , 2012 .

[30]  Donald J. Schuirmann A comparison of the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability , 1987, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[31]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Social fMRI: Investigating and shaping social mechanisms in the real world , 2011, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[32]  Daniel Gatica-Perez,et al.  GroupUs: Smartphone Proximity Data and Human Interaction Type Mining , 2011, 2011 15th Annual International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[33]  Vassilis Kostakos Temporal Graphs , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[34]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Productivity Through Coffee Breaks: Changing Social Networks by Changing Break Structure , 2010 .

[35]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[36]  Maria Ianeva,et al.  Pervasive Technologies for Smart Workplaces: A Workplace Efficiency Solution for Office Design and Building Management from an Occupier's Perspective , 2015, HWID.

[37]  E. Goffman Encounters; Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction , 1962 .

[38]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  The organization and architecture of innovation : managing the flow of technology , 2007 .

[39]  I. D. Been,et al.  The influence of office type on satisfaction and perceived productivity support , 2014 .

[40]  Kerstin Sailer,et al.  The Space-Organisation Relationship. On the Shape of the Relationship between Spatial Configuration and Collective Organisational Behaviours , 2010 .

[41]  Michael D. Santoro,et al.  Facilitating Face-to-Face Communication in High-Tech Teams , 2012 .

[42]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Social Sensors for Automatic Data Collection , 2008, AMCIS.

[43]  Judith K Sluiter,et al.  Effects of office innovation on office workers' health and performance , 2009, Ergonomics.

[44]  Neil Zhao Full-Featured Pedometer Design Realized with 3-Axis Digital Accelerometer , 2010 .

[45]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[46]  Ahmed Lbath,et al.  Hybrid participatory sensing for analyzing group dynamics in the largest annual religious gathering , 2015, UbiComp.

[47]  A. Pentland The new science of building great teams , 2012 .

[48]  Kerstin Sailer,et al.  Data-driven design — Using data on human behaviour and spatial configuration to inform better workplace design , 2015 .

[49]  Iris de Been How to cope with dilemmas in activity based work environments: results from user-centred research , 2015 .

[50]  Tjeerd W. Boonstra,et al.  Using Bluetooth Low Energy in smartphones to map social networks , 2015, ArXiv.

[51]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  Managing the flow of technology: technology transfer and the dissemination of technological informat , 1977 .

[52]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Mining Face-to-Face Interaction Networks using Sociometric Badges: Predicting Productivity in an IT Configuration Task , 2008, ICIS.

[53]  Prabal Dutta,et al.  Opo: a wearable sensor for capturing high-fidelity face-to-face interactions , 2014, SenSys.

[54]  Tanzeem Choudhury,et al.  The Sociometer: A Wearable Device for Understanding Human Networks , 2002 .