Online Coordination of Plug-In Electric Vehicles Considering Grid Congestion and Smart Grid Power Quality

This paper first introduces the impacts of battery charger and nonlinear load harmonics on smart grids considering random plug-in of electric vehicles (PEVs) without any coordination. Then, a new centralized nonlinear online maximum sensitivity selection-based charging algorithm (NOL-MSSCA) is proposed for coordinating PEVs that minimizes the costs associated with generation and losses considering network and bus total harmonic distortion (THD). The aim is to first attend the high priority customers and charge their vehicles as quickly as possible while postponing the service to medium and low priority consumers to the off-peak hours, considering network, battery and power quality constraints and harmonics. The vehicles were randomly plugged at different locations during a period of 24 h. The proposed PEV coordination is based on the maximum sensitivity selection (MSS), which is the sensitivity of losses (including fundamental and harmonic losses) with respect to the PEV location (PEV bus). The proposed algorithm uses the decoupled harmonic power flow (DHPF) to model the nonlinear loads (including the PEV chargers) as current harmonic sources and computes the harmonic power losses, harmonic voltages and THD of the smart grid. The MSS vectors are easily determined using the entries of the Jacobian matrix of the DHPF program, which includes the spectrums of all injected harmonics by nonlinear electric vehicle (EV) chargers and nonlinear industrial loads. The sensitivity of the objective function (fundamental and harmonic power losses) to the PEVs were then used to schedule PEVs accordingly. The algorithm successfully controls the network THDv level within the standard limit of 5% for low and moderate PEV penetrations by delaying PEV charging activities. For high PEV penetrations, the installation of passive power filters (PPFs) is suggested to reduce the THDv and manage to fully charge the PEVs. Detailed simulations considering random and coordinated charging were performed on the modified IEEE 23 kV distribution system with 22 low voltage residential networks populated with PEVs that have nonlinear battery chargers. Simulation results are provided without/with filters for different penetration levels of PEVs.

[1]  P. T. Krein,et al.  Review of the Impact of Vehicle-to-Grid Technologies on Distribution Systems and Utility Interfaces , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[2]  Syed Islam,et al.  Mitigation of harmonics in smart grids with high penetration of plug-in electric vehicles , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[3]  J. C. Gomez,et al.  Impact of EV battery chargers on the power quality of distribution systems , 2002 .

[4]  Mohammad A. S. Masoum,et al.  Real-Time Coordination of Plug-In Electric Vehicle Charging in Smart Grids to Minimize Power Losses and Improve Voltage Profile , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[5]  Jianwei Huang,et al.  An Online Learning Algorithm for Demand Response in Smart Grid , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[6]  M.A.S. Masoum,et al.  Optimal placement and sizing of fixed and switched capacitor banks under nonsinusoidal operating conditions , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting,.

[7]  李君 NISSAN LEAF 或许,就在明天 , 2010 .

[8]  M. Hadi Amini,et al.  Simultaneous allocation of electric vehicles’ parking lots and distributed renewable resources in smart power distribution networks , 2017 .

[9]  Pu Xiao-wen Harmonic Study of Electric Vehicle Chargers , 2006 .

[10]  S. Civanlar,et al.  Volt/Var Control on Distribution Systems with Lateral Branches Using Shunt Capacitors and Voltage Regulators Part III: The Numerical Results , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[11]  M. Ladjavardi,et al.  Genetically Optimized Fuzzy Placement and Sizing of Capacitor Banks in Distorted Distribution Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[12]  Mohammad A. S. Masoum,et al.  Power Quality in Power Systems and Electrical Machines , 2008 .

[13]  A. Abu-Siada,et al.  Fuzzy Approach for Online Coordination of Plug-In Electric Vehicle Charging in Smart Grid , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[14]  Shahab Bahrami,et al.  Game Theoretic Based Charging Strategy for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[15]  Xi Fang,et al.  3. Full Four-channel 6.3-gb/s 60-ghz Cmos Transceiver with Low-power Analog and Digital Baseband Circuitry 7. Smart Grid — the New and Improved Power Grid: a Survey , 2022 .

[16]  Bhim Singh,et al.  An EV battery charger with power factor corrected bridgeless zeta converter topology , 2016, 2016 7th India International Conference on Power Electronics (IICPE).

[17]  Mo-Yuen Chow,et al.  A Survey on the Electrification of Transportation in a Smart Grid Environment , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[18]  MOHAMAD R. KHALDI,et al.  Sensitivity Matrices for Reactive Power Dispatch and Voltage Control of Large-Scale Power Systems , 2004 .

[19]  Surya Santoso,et al.  Electric Vehicle Charging on Residential Distribution Systems: Impacts and Mitigations , 2015, IEEE Access.

[20]  E. Coyle,et al.  Harmonic distortion caused by EV battery chargers in the distribution systems network and its remedy , 2004, 39th International Universities Power Engineering Conference, 2004. UPEC 2004..

[21]  M.A.S. Masoum,et al.  Optimal Scheduling of LTC and Shunt Capacitors in Large Distorted Distribution Systems Using Evolutionary-Based Algorithms , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[22]  Ronald G. Harley,et al.  Residential harmonic loads and EV charging , 2001, 2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194).