Communication motives (state vs. trait?) and task group outcomes

Students’ motives for communicating with others (trait) and their motives for communicating in groups were investigated to determine support for a trait or state approach to studying motives. In addition, communication motives in groups were investigated for their relationship to members’ involvement, satisfaction with group process and outputs and perceptions of cohesion and satisfaction with their group presentation. Students completed the trait Communication Motives measure at the start of the semester before engaging in group projects. At the end of the semester when group work ended, students completed instruments measuring their motives for communicating in their groups and the group outcomes. First, the results showed that motives had some cross‐situational consistency in that students who communicated for pleasure and affection, but not for control or to escape also communicated similarly in groups. Those who communicated for control and, to a limited extent for pleasure, also communicated in groups from these motives. Second, students who communicated in groups from pleasure, relaxation, and affection motives had higher levels of group process satisfaction, satisfaction with the presentation, perceptions of cohesion, and somewhat greater involvement. This study offers some support for the consistency issue of establishing motives as traits. The authors suggest that communication traits are meaningful antecedent factors warranting inclusion in group research.

[1]  W. E. Jurma,et al.  Leadership Structuring Style, Task Ambiguity, and Group Member Satisfaction , 1978 .

[2]  Matthew M. Martin,et al.  The father‐young adult relationship: Interpersonal motives, self‐disclosure, and satisfaction , 1995 .

[3]  W. Schutz.  The Interpersonal Underworld , 1966 .

[4]  David Shinji Kondo,et al.  A comparative analysis of interpersonal communication motives between high and low communication apprehensives , 1994 .

[5]  S. Weinberg.  Measurement of communication aspects of group cohesion , 1979 .

[6]  Matthew M. Martin,et al.  Communication motives of assertive and responsive communicators , 1995 .

[7]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Introduction: Communication and Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[8]  Rebecca B. Rubin,et al.  Antecedents of interpersonal communication motivation , 1992 .

[9]  Elizabeth E. Graham,et al.  The interpersonal communication motives model , 1993 .

[10]  Randy Hirokawa,et al.  Consensus Group Decision-Making, Quality of Decision, and Group Satisfaction: An Attempt to Sort "Fact" from "Fiction.". , 1982 .

[11]  R. Rubin,et al.  Conceptualization and Measurement of Interpersonal Communication Motives , 1988 .

[12]  D. Cegala,et al.  Interaction Involvement: A Cognitive Dimension of Communicative Competence. , 1981 .

[13]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Bona Fide Groups: An Alternative Perspective for Communication and Small Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[14]  Carolyn M. Anderson,et al.  Why Employees Speak to Coworkers and Bosses: Motives, Gender, and Organizational Satisfaction , 1995 .

[15]  A. Rubin,et al.  Interface of personal and mediated communication: A research agenda , 1985 .

[16]  Carolyn M. Anderson,et al.  The Effects of Communication Motives, Interaction Involvement, and Loneliness on Satisfaction , 1995 .

[17]  Charles Pavitt,et al.  Small Group Discussion: A Theoretical Approach , 1990 .

[18]  Dennis S. Gouran.  The future of small group communication research: Revitalization or continued good health? , 1994 .

[19]  Rebecca B. Rubin,et al.  Development of a measure of interpersonal communication competence , 1994 .

[20]  Mark E. Johnson,et al.  Task-Focused Self-Disclosure , 1989 .

[21]  Carolyn M. Anderson,et al.  The relationship of argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness to cohesion, consensus, and satisfaction in small groups , 1999 .

[22]  John A. Daly,et al.  Personality and interpersonal communication , 1987 .

[23]  D. Cegala,et al.  An Investigation of Interaction Involvement and the Dimensions of SYMLOG: Perceived Communication Behaviors of Persons in Task-Oriented Groups. , 1987 .

[24]  Peter W. Dorfman,et al.  The Effects of Group Performance on Cognitions, Satisfaction, and Behavior: A Process Model , 1984 .

[25]  David W. Wright,et al.  Small group communication research of the 1970's: A synthesis and critique , 1980 .

[26]  P. E. Mudrack,et al.  Defining Group Cohesiveness , 1989 .

[27]  Lawrence A. Hosman.  The relationships among need for privacy, loneliness, conversational sensitivity, and interpersonal communication motives , 1991 .

[28]  A. Rubin.  The effect of locus of control on communication motivation, anxiety, and satisfaction , 1993 .

[29]  Joann Keyton.  Introduction The Relational Side of Groups , 2000 .

[30]  M. Hecht.  Measures of Communication Satisfaction , 1978 .

[31]  Dominic A. Infante,et al.  Building communication theory , 1990 .

[32]  Grant T. Savage,et al.  An elaboration of the meaning of interaction involvement: Toward the development of a theoretical concept , 1982 .