Anechoic sphere phantoms for estimating 3-D resolution of very-high-frequency ultrasound scanners

Two phantoms have been constructed for assessing performance of high-frequency ultrasound imagers. They also allow for periodic quality assurance tests and training technicians in the use of higher-frequency scanners. The phantoms contain eight blocks of tissue-mimicking material; each block contains a spatially random distribution of suitably small anechoic spheres having a small distribution of diameters. The eight mean sphere diameters are distributed from 0.10 to 1.09 mm. The two phantoms differ primarily in terms of the frequency dependence of the backscatter coefficient of the background material. Because spheres have no preferred orientation, all three (spatial) dimensions of resolution contribute to sphere detection on an equal basis; thus, the resolution is termed 3-D. Two high-frequency scanners are compared. One employs single-element (fixed focus) transducers (25 and 55 MHz), and the other employs variable focus linear arrays (20, 30, and 40 MHz). The depth range for detection of spheres of each size is determined corresponding to determination of 3-D resolution as a function of depth. As expected, the single-element transducers are severely limited in useful imaging depth ranges compared with the linear arrays. In this preliminary report, only one human observer analyzed images.

[1]  J W Hunt,et al.  Measurement of the ultrasonic properties of vascular tissues and blood from 35-65 MHz. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  E. Madsen,et al.  Method of data reduction for accurate determination of acoustic backscatter coefficients. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  J. Faran Sound Scattering by Solid Cylinders and Spheres , 1951 .

[4]  J M Kofler,et al.  Improved method for determining resolution zones in ultrasound phantoms with spherical simulated lesions. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  E. Madsen,et al.  Interlaboratory Comparison of Ultrasonic Backscatter Coefficient Measurements From 2 to 9 MHz , 2005, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[6]  J. G. Miller,et al.  Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter, attenuation, and speed measurements. , 1999, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[7]  E. Madsen,et al.  Interlaboratory Comparison of Backscatter Coefficient Estimates for Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms: , 2010 .

[8]  E. Madsen,et al.  Tests of backscatter coefficient measurement using broadband pulses , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  E L Madsen,et al.  Liquid or solid ultrasonically tissue-mimicking materials with very low scatter. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.