Accurate detection and complete tracking of large populations of features in three dimensions.

Localization and tracking of colloidal particles in microscopy images generates the raw data necessary to understand both the dynamics and the mechanical properties of colloidal model systems. Yet, despite the obvious importance of analyzing particle movement in three dimensions (3D), accurate sub-pixel localization of the particles in 3D has received little attention so far. Tracking has been limited by the choice of whether to track all particles in a low-density system, or whether to neglect the most mobile fraction of particles in a dense system. Moreover, assertions are frequently made on the accuracies of methods for locating particles in colloid physics and in biology, and the field of particle locating and tracking can be well-served by quantitative comparison of relative performances. We show that by iterating sub-pixel localization in three dimensions, the centers of particles can be more accurately located in three-dimensions (3D) than with all previous methods by at least half an order of magnitude. In addition, we show that implementing a multi-pass deflation approach, greater fidelity can be achieved in reconstruction of trajectories, once particle positions are known. In general, all future work must defend the accuracy of the particle tracks to be considered reliable. Specifically, other researchers must use the methods presented here (or an alternative whose accuracy can be substantianted) in order for the entire investigation to be considered legitimate, if the basis of the physical argument (in colloids, biology, or any other application) depends on quantitative accuracy of particle positions. We compare our algorithms to other recent and related advances in location/tracking in colloids and in biology, and discuss the relative strengths and weaknesses of all the algorithms in various situations. We carry out performance tests directly comparing the accuracy of our and other 3D methods with simulated data for both location and tracking, and in providing relative performance data, we assess just how accurately software can locate particles. We discuss how our methods, now applied to colloids, could improve the location and tracking of features such as quantum dots in cells.

[1]  David A. Weitz,et al.  Structural Rearrangements That Govern Flow in Colloidal Glasses , 2007, Science.

[2]  Aneesur Rahman,et al.  Correlations in the Motion of Atoms in Liquid Argon , 1964 .

[3]  D A Weitz,et al.  Properties of cage rearrangements observed near the colloidal glass transition. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[4]  K. Jaqaman,et al.  Robust single particle tracking in live cell time-lapse sequences , 2008, Nature Methods.

[5]  W. Kegel,et al.  Direct observation of dynamical heterogeneities in colloidal hard-sphere suspensions , 2000, Science.

[6]  Structure and dynamics of colloidal depletion gels: coincidence of transitions and heterogeneity. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Kazuhiro Otsuka,et al.  Real-time Visual Tracker by Stream Processing , 2009, J. Signal Process. Syst..

[8]  H. Lekkerkerker,et al.  Colloidal Hard-Sphere Crystal Growth Frustrated by Large Spherical Impurities , 2005, Science.

[9]  P. Doyle,et al.  Static and dynamic errors in particle tracking microrheology. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[10]  S. Glotzer,et al.  Spatial correlations of mobility and immobility in a glass-forming Lennard-Jones liquid. , 1998, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[11]  David A Weitz,et al.  Target-locking acquisition with real-time confocal (TARC) microscopy. , 2007, Optics express.

[12]  D. Weitz,et al.  Gelation of particles with short-range attraction , 2008, Nature.

[13]  Wiley,et al.  Numerical simulation of the dense random packing of a binary mixture of hard spheres: Amorphous metals. , 1987, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[14]  A. Sergé,et al.  Dynamic multiple-target tracing to probe spatiotemporal cartography of cell membranes , 2008, Nature Methods.

[15]  P. Sorger,et al.  Automatic fluorescent tag detection in 3D with super‐resolution: application to the analysis of chromosome movement , 2002, Journal of microscopy.

[16]  O Dauchot,et al.  Subdiffusion and cage effect in a sheared granular material. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[17]  Michael J Saxton,et al.  Single-particle tracking: connecting the dots , 2008, Nature Methods.

[18]  Y Gao,et al.  Direct imaging of dynamical heterogeneities near the colloid-gel transition. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[19]  H. Lekkerkerker,et al.  Devitrification of colloidal glasses in real space. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Schofield,et al.  Three-dimensional direct imaging of structural relaxation near the colloidal glass transition , 2000, Science.

[21]  W. Kegel,et al.  Direct measurement of the free energy by optical microscopy. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  D. Grier,et al.  Methods of Digital Video Microscopy for Colloidal Studies , 1996 .

[23]  Andrew Schofield,et al.  Real-Space Imaging of Nucleation and Growth in Colloidal Crystallization , 2001, Science.

[24]  J. Crocker,et al.  Multiple-particle tracking and two-point microrheology in cells. , 2007, Methods in cell biology.

[25]  A. Louis,et al.  Measuring colloidal interactions with confocal microscopy. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[26]  A G Yodh,et al.  Premelting at Defects Within Bulk Colloidal Crystals , 2005, Science.

[27]  S. Egelhaaf,et al.  Confocal microscopy of colloidal particles: towards reliable, optimum coordinates. , 2007, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[28]  Alexey K. Kromin,et al.  Nanoparticle sizing with a resolution beyond the diffraction limit using UV light scattering spectroscopy , 2003 .