Dynamically consistent reduction of logical regulatory graphs

To cope with the increasing complexity of regulatory networks, we define a reduction method for multi-valued logical models. Starting with a detailed model, we use decision diagrams to compute reduced models by iteratively ''removing'' regulatory components. To keep a consistent dynamical behaviour, the logical rules associated with the targets of each removed node are actualised to account for the (indirect) effects of its regulators. This construction of reduced models preserves crucial dynamical properties of the original model, including stable states and more complex attractors. In this respect, the relationship between the attractor configuration of the original model and those of reduced models is formally established. We further analyse the issue of attractor reachability. Finally, we illustrate the flexibility and efficiency of the proposed reduction method by its application to a multi-valued model of the fly segment polarity network, which is involved in the control of segmentation during early embryogenesis.

[1]  Jon T. Butler,et al.  Multiple-valued logic , 1995 .

[2]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  Segmenting the fly embryo: a logical analysis of the pair-rule cross-regulatory module. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  D. Thieffry,et al.  Dynamical behaviour of biological regulatory networks—I. Biological role of feedback loops and practical use of the concept of the loop-characteristic state , 1995 .

[4]  Madalena Chaves,et al.  Robustness and fragility of Boolean models for genetic regulatory networks. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  D. Thieffry,et al.  Segmenting the fly embryo: logical analysis of the role of the segment polarity cross-regulatory module. , 2008, The International journal of developmental biology.

[6]  Sofia Cassel,et al.  Graph-Based Algorithms for Boolean Function Manipulation , 2012 .

[7]  H. Othmer,et al.  The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  Radu Mateescu,et al.  Temporal logic patterns for querying dynamic models of cellular interaction networks , 2008, ECCB.

[9]  Elisabeth Remy,et al.  From minimal signed circuits to the dynamics of Boolean regulatory networks , 2008, ECCB.

[10]  Aurélien Naldi,et al.  Dynamical analysis of a generic Boolean model for the control of the mammalian cell cycle , 2006, ISMB.

[11]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  Host-pathogen systems biology: logical modelling of hepatocyte growth factor and Helicobacter pylori induced c-Met signal transduction , 2008, BMC Systems Biology.

[12]  J. van Leeuwen,et al.  Theoretical Computer Science , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[13]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  Qualitative Analysis of Regulatory Graphs: A Computational Tool Based on a Discrete Formal Framework , 2003, POSTA.

[14]  Jean-François Pradat-Peyre,et al.  New Efficient Petri Nets Reductions for Parallel Programs Verification , 2006, Parallel Process. Lett..

[15]  H. Meinhardt,et al.  Hierarchical Inductions of Cell States: A Model for Segmentation in Drosophila , 1986, Journal of Cell Science.

[16]  Robert H. Sloan,et al.  Reduction rules for time Petri nets , 1996, Acta Informatica.

[17]  Ashish Tiwari,et al.  Automated Symbolic Reachability Analysis; with Application to Delta-Notch Signaling Automata , 2003, HSCC.

[18]  Giovanni De Micheli,et al.  Synchronous versus asynchronous modeling of gene regulatory networks , 2008, Bioinform..

[19]  Tiziano Villa,et al.  Multi-valued decision diagrams: theory and applications , 1998 .

[20]  Aurélien Naldi,et al.  Logical modelling of regulatory networks with GINsim 2.3 , 2009, Biosyst..

[21]  François Fages,et al.  Abstract interpretation and types for systems biology , 2008, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[22]  Joseph Sifakis,et al.  Property Preserving Homomorphisms of Transition Systems , 1983, Logic of Programs.

[23]  Aurélien Naldi,et al.  Decision Diagrams for the Representation and Analysis of Logical Models of Genetic Networks , 2007, CMSB.

[24]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  A Logical Model Provides Insights into T Cell Receptor Signaling , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[25]  Gérard Berthelot,et al.  Checking properties of nets using transformation , 1985, Applications and Theory in Petri Nets.

[26]  René Thomas Regulatory networks seen as asynchronous automata: A logical description , 1991 .

[27]  Aurélien Naldi,et al.  Petri net representation of multi-valued logical regulatory graphs , 2011, Natural Computing.

[28]  G. Odell,et al.  The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module , 2000, Nature.

[29]  Nicholas T Ingolia,et al.  Topology and Robustness in the Drosophila Segment Polarity Network , 2004, PLoS biology.

[30]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  Logical modelling of the role of the Hh pathway in the patterning of the Drosophila wing disc , 2008, ECCB.