Acesso gratuito a medicamentos para tratamento de doenças crônicas no Brasil

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To analyze the free access to medicines for the treatment of chronic diseases in the Brazilian population, according to demographic and socioeconomic factors. We also analyzed the most used pharmacological groups, according to funding source: free-of-charge or out-of-pocket paid. METHODS Analysis of data from the Pesquisa Nacional sobre Acesso, Utilizacao e Promocao do Uso Racional de Medicamentos (PNAUM – National Survey on Access, Use and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines), a population-based household survey, of cross-sectional design, based on probabilistic sample of the Brazilian population. We analyzed as outcome the prevalence of free access (free-of-charge) to all medicines for treatment of the reported chronic diseases, in the last 30 days. We studied the following independent variables: sex, age group, education in complete years of school, economic class, health plan, and geographical region of residence. We estimated the prevalences and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) and applied the Pearson’s Chi-squared test to assess the differences between the groups, considering a 5% significance level. RESULTS About half of adults and older adults who have had full access to the treatment of chronic diseases in Brazil obtained all needed medicines for free (47.5%; 95%CI 45.1–50.0). The prevalences of free access were higher among men (51.4%; 95%CI 48.1–54.8), age group of 40-59 years (51.1%; 95%CI 48.1–54.2), and in the poorest social classes (53.9%; 95%CI 50.2–57.7). The majority of medicines that act on the cardiovascular system, such as diuretics (C03) (78.0%; 95%CI 75.2–80.5), beta-blockers (C07) (62.7%; 95%CI 59.4–65.8), and the agents that work in the renin-angiotensin system (C09) (73.4%; 95%CI 70.8–75.8), were obtained for free. Medicines that act on the respiratory system, such as agents against obstructive airway diseases (R03) (60.0%; 95%CI 52.7–66.9) were mostly paid with own resources. CONCLUSIONS Free access to medicines for treatment of chronic diseases occurs to a considerable portion of the Brazilian population, especially for the poorest ones, indicating decreased socioeconomic inequalities, but with differences between regions and between some classes of medicines.

[1]  Alessandra Maciel Almeida,et al.  Pesquisa Nacional sobre Acesso, Utilização e Promoção do Uso Racional de Medicamentos: métodos , 2017 .

[2]  L. Ramos,et al.  National Survey on Access, Use and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines (PNAUM): household survey component methods , 2016, Revista de saude publica.

[3]  M. Goldbaum,et al.  Access to medication in the Public Health System and equity: populational health surveys in São Paulo, Brazil. , 2016, Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology.

[4]  D. Malta,et al.  Fontes de obtenção de medicamentos para tratamento de hipertensão arterial no Brasil: análise da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, 2013 , 2015 .

[5]  Karen Sarmento Costa,et al.  Disponibilidade de medicamentos nas unidades básicas de saúde e fatores relacionados: uma abordagem transversal Availability of medicines in primary health care facilities and related factors: a cross sectional approach , 2014 .

[6]  Leila Posenato Garcia,et al.  Gastos das famílias brasileiras com medicamentos segundo a renda familiar: análise da Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares de 2002-2003 e de 2008-2009 , 2013 .

[7]  K. Peres,et al.  [Access to medicines in the public sector: analysis of users of the Brazilian Unified National Health System]. , 2013, Cadernos de saude publica.

[8]  F. Acurcio,et al.  Uso de anti-hipertensivos e antidiabéticos por idosos: inquérito em Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil , 2012 .

[9]  Panos Kanavos,et al.  Is the Brazilian pharmaceutical policy ensuring population access to essential medicines? , 2012, Globalization and Health.

[10]  N. Tavares,et al.  Capacidade aquisitiva e disponibilidade de medicamentos para doenças crônicas no setor público , 2012 .

[11]  B. D. Saúde.,et al.  As redes de atenção à saúde , 2012 .

[12]  I. Schneider,et al.  [Prevalence and factors associated with access to medication among the elderly in a city in southern Brazil: a population-based study]. , 2011, Cadernos de saude publica.

[13]  Chester Luiz Galvão Cesar,et al.  Tendências das desigualdades sociais e demográficas na prevalência de doenças crônicas no Brasil, PNAD: 2003- 2008 , 2011 .

[14]  Andréa Dâmaso Bertoldi,et al.  Desigualdades socioeconómicas en los gastos y comprometimiento de la renta con medicamentos en el Sur de Brasil , 2011 .

[15]  Bruce Bartholow Duncan,et al.  Chronic non-communicable diseases in Brazil: burden and current challenges , 2011, The Lancet.

[16]  D. Ross-Degnan,et al.  Access to care and medicines, burden of health care expenditures, and risk protection: results from the World Health Survey. , 2011, Health policy.

[17]  M. Domingues,et al.  Free access to hypertension and diabetes medicines among the elderly: a reality yet to be constructed. , 2010, Cadernos de saude publica.

[18]  Dennis Ross-Degnan,et al.  Medicine access and utilization in a population covered by primary health care in Brazil. , 2009, Health policy.

[19]  D. Silveira,et al.  Acesso a medicamentos de uso contínuo em adultos e idosos nas regiões Sul e Nordeste do Brasil , 2008 .

[20]  C. Szwarcwald,et al.  Utilization of medicines by the Brazilian population, 2003. , 2005, Cadernos de saude publica.